荷兰临床损害评估:临床饮食失调样本的因素分析和心理测量特性。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Daniela Schlochtermeier, Matthijs Blankers, Jaap Peen, Elske van den Berg, Ella van Beers, Bernou Melisse, Jitske Koenders, Anna E Goudriaan, Margo de Jonge, Jack Dekker, Edwin de Beurs
{"title":"荷兰临床损害评估:临床饮食失调样本的因素分析和心理测量特性。","authors":"Daniela Schlochtermeier, Matthijs Blankers, Jaap Peen, Elske van den Berg, Ella van Beers, Bernou Melisse, Jitske Koenders, Anna E Goudriaan, Margo de Jonge, Jack Dekker, Edwin de Beurs","doi":"10.1007/s40519-025-01767-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study reports on the psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the clinical impairment assessment (CIA) questionnaire in female patients with eating disorders. The aim of this study was to determine the factor structure of the CIA as there are conflicting studies supporting a three-factor, bifactor, and single-factor model with a general factor and three specific factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CIA was translated and administered to 321 female patients with various eating disorders receiving treatment in a specialized eating disorder center. Its factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and sensitivity to change were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analyses showed the best fit was a bifactor model with one strong general factor and three less strong specific factors for personal, social, and cognitive impairment. Furthermore, good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91), good convergent validity between CIA global score and eating disorder examination questionnaire global score (r = 0.58; p < 0.001) and good sensitivity to change (t (115) = 13.76, p < 0.001) were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Dutch CIA is a reliable and valid instrument to measure impairment secondary to eating disorder symptoms, but interpretations made from subscales scores should be used with caution.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, validation study.</p>","PeriodicalId":11391,"journal":{"name":"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity","volume":"30 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279594/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dutch clinical impairment assessment: factor analysis and psychometric properties in a clinical eating disorder sample.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Schlochtermeier, Matthijs Blankers, Jaap Peen, Elske van den Berg, Ella van Beers, Bernou Melisse, Jitske Koenders, Anna E Goudriaan, Margo de Jonge, Jack Dekker, Edwin de Beurs\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40519-025-01767-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study reports on the psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the clinical impairment assessment (CIA) questionnaire in female patients with eating disorders. The aim of this study was to determine the factor structure of the CIA as there are conflicting studies supporting a three-factor, bifactor, and single-factor model with a general factor and three specific factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CIA was translated and administered to 321 female patients with various eating disorders receiving treatment in a specialized eating disorder center. Its factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and sensitivity to change were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analyses showed the best fit was a bifactor model with one strong general factor and three less strong specific factors for personal, social, and cognitive impairment. Furthermore, good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91), good convergent validity between CIA global score and eating disorder examination questionnaire global score (r = 0.58; p < 0.001) and good sensitivity to change (t (115) = 13.76, p < 0.001) were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Dutch CIA is a reliable and valid instrument to measure impairment secondary to eating disorder symptoms, but interpretations made from subscales scores should be used with caution.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, validation study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12279594/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-025-01767-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-025-01767-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究女性进食障碍患者临床损害评估(CIA)问卷荷兰语译本的心理测量特征。本研究的目的是确定中央情报局的因素结构,因为有相互矛盾的研究支持三因素、双因素和单因素模型,其中包括一个一般因素和三个特定因素。方法:对321名在专门的饮食失调中心接受治疗的患有各种饮食失调症的女性患者进行翻译和管理。考察了其因子结构、内部一致性、收敛效度和变化敏感性。结果:验证性因素分析显示,最适合的是一个双因素模型,其中一个强一般因素和三个较弱的个人,社会和认知障碍的特定因素。内部一致性好(Cronbach’s α = 0.91), CIA总体评分与饮食失调检查问卷总体评分的收敛效度好(r = 0.58;结论:荷兰CIA是一种可靠有效的测量饮食失调症状继发损害的工具,但对亚量表评分的解释应谨慎使用。证据等级:III级,验证性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Dutch clinical impairment assessment: factor analysis and psychometric properties in a clinical eating disorder sample.

Purpose: The present study reports on the psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the clinical impairment assessment (CIA) questionnaire in female patients with eating disorders. The aim of this study was to determine the factor structure of the CIA as there are conflicting studies supporting a three-factor, bifactor, and single-factor model with a general factor and three specific factors.

Methods: The CIA was translated and administered to 321 female patients with various eating disorders receiving treatment in a specialized eating disorder center. Its factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and sensitivity to change were investigated.

Results: Confirmatory factor analyses showed the best fit was a bifactor model with one strong general factor and three less strong specific factors for personal, social, and cognitive impairment. Furthermore, good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.91), good convergent validity between CIA global score and eating disorder examination questionnaire global score (r = 0.58; p < 0.001) and good sensitivity to change (t (115) = 13.76, p < 0.001) were found.

Conclusions: The Dutch CIA is a reliable and valid instrument to measure impairment secondary to eating disorder symptoms, but interpretations made from subscales scores should be used with caution.

Level of evidence: Level III, validation study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
170
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity is a scientific journal whose main purpose is to create an international forum devoted to the several sectors of eating disorders and obesity and the significant relations between them. The journal publishes basic research, clinical and theoretical articles on eating disorders and weight-related problems: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, subthreshold eating disorders, obesity, atypical patterns of eating behaviour and body weight regulation in clinical and non-clinical populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信