机械通气烧伤患者的生存及相关危险因素:一项横断面研究。

Siamak Rimaz, Vahideh Abdi, Cyrus Emir Alavi, Sanaz Masoumi, Mahsa Sadeghi, Mohammadreza Mobayen, Parissa Bagheri
{"title":"机械通气烧伤患者的生存及相关危险因素:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Siamak Rimaz, Vahideh Abdi, Cyrus Emir Alavi, Sanaz Masoumi, Mahsa Sadeghi, Mohammadreza Mobayen, Parissa Bagheri","doi":"10.30476/beat.2025.104399.1549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the survival rate and identify associated risk factors in mechanically ventilated (MV) burn patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at Velayat Hospital, a burn and plastic surgery referral center affiliated with Guilan University of Medical Sciences, between March 2011, and September 2020. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records and analyzed using SPSS software (version 24.0). Patients discharged alive or lost to follow-up were treated as censored observations in a time-to-event analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of survivors was 19.03±30.21 years, compared to 42.54±19.30 years in the non-survivors. Men comprised 78.9% (n=30) of survivors and 64.9% (n=155) of non-survivors. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) survival time was 18.33±1.36 days (median=12±1.24 days). There were significant differences between survivor and non-survivor groups in terms of age, length of stay, presence of comorbidities, inhalation injury, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and acute kidney injury (AKI) (<i>p</i><0.05). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant difference in survival probability between MV and non-MV groups (<i>p</i>=0.028), with a higher survival probability observed in non-MV patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age, length of stay, renal failure, ARDS, and sepsis were associated with increased mortality risk in MV burn patients. While these findings highlighted critical prognostic factors, causal inferences require further investigation through longitudinal or interventional studies to guide targeted therapeutic strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9333,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","volume":"13 2","pages":"83-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival and Associated Risk Factors in Mechanically Ventilated Burn Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Siamak Rimaz, Vahideh Abdi, Cyrus Emir Alavi, Sanaz Masoumi, Mahsa Sadeghi, Mohammadreza Mobayen, Parissa Bagheri\",\"doi\":\"10.30476/beat.2025.104399.1549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the survival rate and identify associated risk factors in mechanically ventilated (MV) burn patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at Velayat Hospital, a burn and plastic surgery referral center affiliated with Guilan University of Medical Sciences, between March 2011, and September 2020. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records and analyzed using SPSS software (version 24.0). Patients discharged alive or lost to follow-up were treated as censored observations in a time-to-event analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of survivors was 19.03±30.21 years, compared to 42.54±19.30 years in the non-survivors. Men comprised 78.9% (n=30) of survivors and 64.9% (n=155) of non-survivors. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) survival time was 18.33±1.36 days (median=12±1.24 days). There were significant differences between survivor and non-survivor groups in terms of age, length of stay, presence of comorbidities, inhalation injury, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and acute kidney injury (AKI) (<i>p</i><0.05). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant difference in survival probability between MV and non-MV groups (<i>p</i>=0.028), with a higher survival probability observed in non-MV patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age, length of stay, renal failure, ARDS, and sepsis were associated with increased mortality risk in MV burn patients. While these findings highlighted critical prognostic factors, causal inferences require further investigation through longitudinal or interventional studies to guide targeted therapeutic strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"83-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275167/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of emergency and trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30476/beat.2025.104399.1549\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of emergency and trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/beat.2025.104399.1549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定机械通气(MV)烧伤患者的生存率和相关危险因素。方法:本横断面分析研究于2011年3月至2020年9月在桂兰医科大学附属烧伤和整形外科转诊中心Velayat医院进行。数据从电子病历中检索,并使用SPSS软件(24.0版)进行分析。活着出院或随访失败的患者在事件时间分析中被视为删节观察。结果:存活者的平均年龄为19.03±30.21岁,非存活者的平均年龄为42.54±19.30岁。男性占78.9% (n=30)的幸存者和64.9% (n=155)的非幸存者。重症监护病房(ICU)平均生存时间为18.33±1.36天(中位数为12±1.24天)。存活组和非存活组在年龄、住院时间、合并症、吸入性损伤、败血症、急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)和急性肾损伤(AKI)方面存在显著差异(pp=0.028),非mv患者的生存率更高。结论:年龄、住院时间、肾功能衰竭、ARDS和败血症与MV烧伤患者死亡风险增加相关。虽然这些发现强调了关键的预后因素,但因果推论需要通过纵向或介入性研究进一步调查,以指导有针对性的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Survival and Associated Risk Factors in Mechanically Ventilated Burn Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Survival and Associated Risk Factors in Mechanically Ventilated Burn Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the survival rate and identify associated risk factors in mechanically ventilated (MV) burn patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at Velayat Hospital, a burn and plastic surgery referral center affiliated with Guilan University of Medical Sciences, between March 2011, and September 2020. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records and analyzed using SPSS software (version 24.0). Patients discharged alive or lost to follow-up were treated as censored observations in a time-to-event analysis.

Results: The mean age of survivors was 19.03±30.21 years, compared to 42.54±19.30 years in the non-survivors. Men comprised 78.9% (n=30) of survivors and 64.9% (n=155) of non-survivors. The mean intensive care unit (ICU) survival time was 18.33±1.36 days (median=12±1.24 days). There were significant differences between survivor and non-survivor groups in terms of age, length of stay, presence of comorbidities, inhalation injury, sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and acute kidney injury (AKI) (p<0.05). The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated a significant difference in survival probability between MV and non-MV groups (p=0.028), with a higher survival probability observed in non-MV patients.

Conclusion: Age, length of stay, renal failure, ARDS, and sepsis were associated with increased mortality risk in MV burn patients. While these findings highlighted critical prognostic factors, causal inferences require further investigation through longitudinal or interventional studies to guide targeted therapeutic strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BEAT: Bulletin of Emergency And Trauma is an international, peer-reviewed, quarterly journal coping with original research contributing to the field of emergency medicine and trauma. BEAT is the official journal of the Trauma Research Center (TRC) of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS), Hungarian Trauma Society (HTS) and Lusitanian Association for Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ALTEC/LATES) aiming to be a publication of international repute that serves as a medium for dissemination and exchange of scientific knowledge in the emergency medicine and trauma. The aim of BEAT is to publish original research focusing on practicing and training of emergency medicine and trauma to publish peer-reviewed articles of current international interest in the form of original articles, brief communications, reviews, case reports, clinical images, and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信