{"title":"无牙上颌种植体支撑固定修复体的三维分析:回顾性研究。","authors":"Yan Yan, Ye Lin, Donghao Wei, Ping Di","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06609-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The maxillary incisal edge position is considered the starting point for full-mouth reconstructions. This retrospective study employed three-dimensional virtually planned patient data to evaluate the positional relationship between the upper incisor and underlying alveolar bone in implant-supported fixed prostheses of the edentulous maxilla and the associated influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional virtual models were constructed for 22 edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported fixed prostheses using cone-beam computed tomography, facial and denture scan data. Height and prominence of the residual alveolar bone (vertical residual alveolar bone height [RHeight] and horizontal residual alveolar bone width [RWidth]), crown-to-bone profile angle (AIO, ACO), prosthetic height and width (ProsHeight and ProsWidth, respectively), and incisal position relative to the subspinale point (vertical incisal position [AHeight] and horizontal incisal position [AWidth]) were the parameters measured for the residual alveolar bone profile and the crown-to-bone positional relationship of the upper incisor. Correlation and exploratory multivariate regression analyses were used to identify the key determinants of upper incisor positioning relative to the alveolar bone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The crown-to-bone profile angles used were AIO 65.73 ± 0.92° and ACO 60.47 ± 0.99°. Multivariate regression revealed that residual bone prominence was the dominant predictor of AWidth (B = 0.694, p = 0.003, adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.333). AHeight was jointly predicted by residual bone height (B = 0.374, p = 0.028) and lip length (B = 0.872, p < 0.001), collectively explaining 72.2% variance (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.722). Lip thickness and sex were found no association with prosthetic parameters (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Horizontal and vertical positioning of the upper incisal point was predominantly influenced by the residual ridge width, residual bone height, and upper lip length. Age primarily influences incisor positioning through its effect on residual alveolar bone prominence. Upper lip thickness and sex were found no significant effect on the position of the incisors relative to the alveolar bone.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. (Date:2024-05-11, No. ChiCTR2400084138).</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"1223"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-dimensional analysis of implant-supported fixed prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Yan Yan, Ye Lin, Donghao Wei, Ping Di\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12903-025-06609-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The maxillary incisal edge position is considered the starting point for full-mouth reconstructions. This retrospective study employed three-dimensional virtually planned patient data to evaluate the positional relationship between the upper incisor and underlying alveolar bone in implant-supported fixed prostheses of the edentulous maxilla and the associated influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-dimensional virtual models were constructed for 22 edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported fixed prostheses using cone-beam computed tomography, facial and denture scan data. Height and prominence of the residual alveolar bone (vertical residual alveolar bone height [RHeight] and horizontal residual alveolar bone width [RWidth]), crown-to-bone profile angle (AIO, ACO), prosthetic height and width (ProsHeight and ProsWidth, respectively), and incisal position relative to the subspinale point (vertical incisal position [AHeight] and horizontal incisal position [AWidth]) were the parameters measured for the residual alveolar bone profile and the crown-to-bone positional relationship of the upper incisor. Correlation and exploratory multivariate regression analyses were used to identify the key determinants of upper incisor positioning relative to the alveolar bone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The crown-to-bone profile angles used were AIO 65.73 ± 0.92° and ACO 60.47 ± 0.99°. Multivariate regression revealed that residual bone prominence was the dominant predictor of AWidth (B = 0.694, p = 0.003, adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.333). AHeight was jointly predicted by residual bone height (B = 0.374, p = 0.028) and lip length (B = 0.872, p < 0.001), collectively explaining 72.2% variance (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.722). Lip thickness and sex were found no association with prosthetic parameters (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Horizontal and vertical positioning of the upper incisal point was predominantly influenced by the residual ridge width, residual bone height, and upper lip length. Age primarily influences incisor positioning through its effect on residual alveolar bone prominence. Upper lip thickness and sex were found no significant effect on the position of the incisors relative to the alveolar bone.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. (Date:2024-05-11, No. ChiCTR2400084138).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276674/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06609-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06609-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:上颌切缘位置被认为是全口重建的起点。本研究采用三维虚拟规划的患者数据,对无牙颌种植固定修复体中上切牙与下牙槽骨的位置关系及其影响因素进行了回顾性研究。方法:利用锥形束计算机断层扫描、面部和义齿扫描数据,对22例种植固定义齿修复的无牙患者建立三维虚拟模型。残牙槽骨高度和突出度(垂直残牙槽骨高度[RHeight]和水平残牙槽骨宽度[RWidth]),牙冠-骨轮廓角(AIO, ACO),假体高度和宽度(ProsHeight和ProsWidth分别),和相对于棘下点的切牙位置(垂直切牙位置[AHeight]和水平切牙位置[width])是测量残牙槽骨轮廓和上切牙冠-骨位置关系的参数。使用相关性和探索性多变量回归分析来确定上切牙相对于牙槽骨定位的关键决定因素。结果:采用的冠骨轮廓角AIO为65.73±0.92°,ACO为60.47±0.99°。多因素回归分析显示,残余骨突出是骨宽度的主要预测因子(B = 0.694, p = 0.003,调整后R2 = 0.333)。残骨高度(B = 0.374, p = 0.028)和唇长(B = 0.872, p = 0.722)共同预测高度。唇厚和性别与假体参数无相关性(p < 0.05)。结论:残脊宽度、残骨高度和上唇长度对上切点的水平和垂直定位有重要影响。年龄主要通过对残牙槽骨突出的影响来影响门牙定位。上唇厚度和性别对门牙相对于牙槽骨的位置无显著影响。试验注册:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册。(日期:2024-05-11,不。ChiCTR2400084138)。
Three-dimensional analysis of implant-supported fixed prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla: a retrospective study.
Background: The maxillary incisal edge position is considered the starting point for full-mouth reconstructions. This retrospective study employed three-dimensional virtually planned patient data to evaluate the positional relationship between the upper incisor and underlying alveolar bone in implant-supported fixed prostheses of the edentulous maxilla and the associated influencing factors.
Methods: Three-dimensional virtual models were constructed for 22 edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported fixed prostheses using cone-beam computed tomography, facial and denture scan data. Height and prominence of the residual alveolar bone (vertical residual alveolar bone height [RHeight] and horizontal residual alveolar bone width [RWidth]), crown-to-bone profile angle (AIO, ACO), prosthetic height and width (ProsHeight and ProsWidth, respectively), and incisal position relative to the subspinale point (vertical incisal position [AHeight] and horizontal incisal position [AWidth]) were the parameters measured for the residual alveolar bone profile and the crown-to-bone positional relationship of the upper incisor. Correlation and exploratory multivariate regression analyses were used to identify the key determinants of upper incisor positioning relative to the alveolar bone.
Results: The crown-to-bone profile angles used were AIO 65.73 ± 0.92° and ACO 60.47 ± 0.99°. Multivariate regression revealed that residual bone prominence was the dominant predictor of AWidth (B = 0.694, p = 0.003, adjusted R2 = 0.333). AHeight was jointly predicted by residual bone height (B = 0.374, p = 0.028) and lip length (B = 0.872, p < 0.001), collectively explaining 72.2% variance (adjusted R2 = 0.722). Lip thickness and sex were found no association with prosthetic parameters (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Horizontal and vertical positioning of the upper incisal point was predominantly influenced by the residual ridge width, residual bone height, and upper lip length. Age primarily influences incisor positioning through its effect on residual alveolar bone prominence. Upper lip thickness and sex were found no significant effect on the position of the incisors relative to the alveolar bone.
Trial registration: The study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. (Date:2024-05-11, No. ChiCTR2400084138).
期刊介绍:
BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.