Xyla-P乳膏与利多卡因喷雾:对剖宫产腰麻患者满意度、焦虑、配合和疼痛的影响。

Q2 Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-12 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.5812/aapm-157126
Zahra Ghalenoii, Shohreh Movahedi, Amirabbas Motezaker, Elham Ebrahimi
{"title":"Xyla-P乳膏与利多卡因喷雾:对剖宫产腰麻患者满意度、焦虑、配合和疼痛的影响。","authors":"Zahra Ghalenoii, Shohreh Movahedi, Amirabbas Motezaker, Elham Ebrahimi","doi":"10.5812/aapm-157126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the fundamental principles of medical interventions is to avoid causing pain to patients, and childbirth is no exception. With the rising prevalence of cesarean sections, addressing factors that may diminish maternal satisfaction is crucial. Spinal anesthesia, the most common method for cesarean sections, faces challenges such as patient anxiety. To mitigate pain associated with needle insertion, various methods, including lidocaine spray and Xyla-P cream, have been recommended.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of lidocaine spray and Xyla-P cream in reducing pain during needle insertion for spinal anesthesia in cesarean sections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, placebo-controlled interventional study included 263 pregnant women at 37 weeks or more of gestational age who were candidates for elective cesarean sections. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups using a block permutation technique. In intervention group 1, 10 g of Xyla-P cream was applied 30 minutes before spinal anesthesia. In intervention group 2, three puffs of 10% lidocaine spray were used. The control group received three puffs of water spray ten minutes before anesthesia. Pain intensity and anxiety were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and maternal cooperation was scored by the anesthesiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 30 years, and 21% had no prior history of cesarean section. There was no significant difference in pain, anxiety, satisfaction, and cooperation between the Xyla-P and lidocaine groups. However, in the group receiving lidocaine, satisfaction (P-value: 0.001) and cooperation (P-value: 0.019) improved significantly compared to the placebo group, whereas anxiety increased significantly compared to the placebo group (P-value: 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lidocaine had a positive effect on maternal satisfaction with spinal anesthesia and, compared to the placebo, led to significant improvements in maternal satisfaction and cooperation. In light of these findings, lidocaine emerges as a more appropriate choice than Xyla-P cream.</p>","PeriodicalId":7841,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","volume":"14 6","pages":"e157126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275632/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Xyla-P Cream vs. Lidocaine Spray: Impact on Patient Satisfaction, Anxiety, Cooperation, and Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.\",\"authors\":\"Zahra Ghalenoii, Shohreh Movahedi, Amirabbas Motezaker, Elham Ebrahimi\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/aapm-157126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the fundamental principles of medical interventions is to avoid causing pain to patients, and childbirth is no exception. With the rising prevalence of cesarean sections, addressing factors that may diminish maternal satisfaction is crucial. Spinal anesthesia, the most common method for cesarean sections, faces challenges such as patient anxiety. To mitigate pain associated with needle insertion, various methods, including lidocaine spray and Xyla-P cream, have been recommended.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of lidocaine spray and Xyla-P cream in reducing pain during needle insertion for spinal anesthesia in cesarean sections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, placebo-controlled interventional study included 263 pregnant women at 37 weeks or more of gestational age who were candidates for elective cesarean sections. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups using a block permutation technique. In intervention group 1, 10 g of Xyla-P cream was applied 30 minutes before spinal anesthesia. In intervention group 2, three puffs of 10% lidocaine spray were used. The control group received three puffs of water spray ten minutes before anesthesia. Pain intensity and anxiety were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and maternal cooperation was scored by the anesthesiologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the participants was 30 years, and 21% had no prior history of cesarean section. There was no significant difference in pain, anxiety, satisfaction, and cooperation between the Xyla-P and lidocaine groups. However, in the group receiving lidocaine, satisfaction (P-value: 0.001) and cooperation (P-value: 0.019) improved significantly compared to the placebo group, whereas anxiety increased significantly compared to the placebo group (P-value: 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lidocaine had a positive effect on maternal satisfaction with spinal anesthesia and, compared to the placebo, led to significant improvements in maternal satisfaction and cooperation. In light of these findings, lidocaine emerges as a more appropriate choice than Xyla-P cream.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"14 6\",\"pages\":\"e157126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275632/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-157126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-157126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗干预的基本原则之一是避免给患者造成疼痛,分娩也不例外。随着剖宫产率的上升,解决可能降低产妇满意度的因素至关重要。脊髓麻醉是剖宫产手术中最常用的方法,它面临着诸如患者焦虑等挑战。为了减轻与针刺相关的疼痛,推荐了各种方法,包括利多卡因喷雾和Xyla-P霜。目的:评价利多卡因喷雾剂联合Xyla-P乳膏对剖宫产术中腰麻穿刺疼痛的缓解效果。方法:这项随机、安慰剂对照的干预性研究包括263名37周及以上孕龄的孕妇,她们是选择性剖宫产的候选人。参与者使用块排列技术随机分配到干预组和对照组。干预组1在脊髓麻醉前30分钟应用Xyla-P乳膏10 g。干预组2使用10%利多卡因喷雾剂3次。对照组在麻醉前10分钟喷3次水。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度和焦虑程度,由麻醉医师对产妇配合程度进行评分。结果:参与者的平均年龄为30岁,21%没有剖宫产史。Xyla-P组和利多卡因组在疼痛、焦虑、满意度和合作方面无显著差异。然而,利多卡因组的满意度(p值:0.001)和合作(p值:0.019)较安慰剂组显著改善,而焦虑(p值:0.045)较安慰剂组显著增加。结论:利多卡因对产妇腰麻满意度有积极影响,与安慰剂相比,产妇满意度和配合度显著提高。根据这些发现,利多卡因是比Xyla-P霜更合适的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Xyla-P Cream vs. Lidocaine Spray: Impact on Patient Satisfaction, Anxiety, Cooperation, and Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.

Xyla-P Cream vs. Lidocaine Spray: Impact on Patient Satisfaction, Anxiety, Cooperation, and Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.

Background: One of the fundamental principles of medical interventions is to avoid causing pain to patients, and childbirth is no exception. With the rising prevalence of cesarean sections, addressing factors that may diminish maternal satisfaction is crucial. Spinal anesthesia, the most common method for cesarean sections, faces challenges such as patient anxiety. To mitigate pain associated with needle insertion, various methods, including lidocaine spray and Xyla-P cream, have been recommended.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of lidocaine spray and Xyla-P cream in reducing pain during needle insertion for spinal anesthesia in cesarean sections.

Methods: This randomized, placebo-controlled interventional study included 263 pregnant women at 37 weeks or more of gestational age who were candidates for elective cesarean sections. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups using a block permutation technique. In intervention group 1, 10 g of Xyla-P cream was applied 30 minutes before spinal anesthesia. In intervention group 2, three puffs of 10% lidocaine spray were used. The control group received three puffs of water spray ten minutes before anesthesia. Pain intensity and anxiety were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and maternal cooperation was scored by the anesthesiologist.

Results: The mean age of the participants was 30 years, and 21% had no prior history of cesarean section. There was no significant difference in pain, anxiety, satisfaction, and cooperation between the Xyla-P and lidocaine groups. However, in the group receiving lidocaine, satisfaction (P-value: 0.001) and cooperation (P-value: 0.019) improved significantly compared to the placebo group, whereas anxiety increased significantly compared to the placebo group (P-value: 0.045).

Conclusions: Lidocaine had a positive effect on maternal satisfaction with spinal anesthesia and, compared to the placebo, led to significant improvements in maternal satisfaction and cooperation. In light of these findings, lidocaine emerges as a more appropriate choice than Xyla-P cream.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信