开发一种中年特定的cogrisk算法(cogrisk - ml),以实现从中年到晚年痴呆风险评估的有效实施。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Md Hamidul Huque, Heidi Jane Welberry, Ranmalee Eramudugolla, Nicola T Lautenschlager, Kaarin J Anstey
{"title":"开发一种中年特定的cogrisk算法(cogrisk - ml),以实现从中年到晚年痴呆风险评估的有效实施。","authors":"Md Hamidul Huque, Heidi Jane Welberry, Ranmalee Eramudugolla, Nicola T Lautenschlager, Kaarin J Anstey","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing dementia risk assessment tools, such as The Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI), LIfestyle for BRAin health (LIBRA) and Cognitive health and Dementia Risk Assessment (CogDrisk), show limited validation for middle-aged adults (age 40-64 years). The Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) tool, developed almost two decades ago, demonstrated moderate predictive accuracy. As key modifiable dementia risk factors emerge in midlife, there is a need for a new, more accurate midlife dementia risk assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop CogDrisk-ML, a midlife dementia risk assessment tool that can complement the existing CogDrisk tool for late-life dementia risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Design and settings: </strong>Data from the UK Biobank and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study were used to develop and validate CogDrisk-ML, which was also externally validated using the Whitehall II cohort.</p><p><strong>Participants and covariates: </strong>Participants without dementia at baseline were included, with CogDrisk predictors along with additional midlife risk factors based on recent evidence.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Cox regression models estimated the relationship between risk factors and dementia for each sex. A random-effects meta-analysis model aggregated cohort- and sex-specific regression coefficients to develop CogDrisk-ML. Harrell's C statistics measured predictability, with multiple imputation used for missing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CogDrisk-ML outperformed CAIDE in the UK Biobank and Whitehall II cohorts; however, it provided similar C statistics in the ARIC dataset. C statistics (95% confidence interval) for CogDrisk-ML were 0.71 (0.69, 0.74) for the ARIC, 0.75 (0.73, 0.77) for the UK Biobank and 0.70 (0.62, 0.79) for the Whitehall II study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel CogDrisk-ML for assessing dementia risk in midlife offers improved predictive accuracy. Combined with the CogDrisk tool for late life, it provides a comprehensive framework for dementia prevention throughout the life course.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a midlife-specific CogDrisk algorithm (CogDrisk-ML) to enable validated implementation of dementia risk assessment from midlife to late life.\",\"authors\":\"Md Hamidul Huque, Heidi Jane Welberry, Ranmalee Eramudugolla, Nicola T Lautenschlager, Kaarin J Anstey\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ageing/afaf201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Existing dementia risk assessment tools, such as The Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI), LIfestyle for BRAin health (LIBRA) and Cognitive health and Dementia Risk Assessment (CogDrisk), show limited validation for middle-aged adults (age 40-64 years). The Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) tool, developed almost two decades ago, demonstrated moderate predictive accuracy. As key modifiable dementia risk factors emerge in midlife, there is a need for a new, more accurate midlife dementia risk assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop CogDrisk-ML, a midlife dementia risk assessment tool that can complement the existing CogDrisk tool for late-life dementia risk assessment.</p><p><strong>Design and settings: </strong>Data from the UK Biobank and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study were used to develop and validate CogDrisk-ML, which was also externally validated using the Whitehall II cohort.</p><p><strong>Participants and covariates: </strong>Participants without dementia at baseline were included, with CogDrisk predictors along with additional midlife risk factors based on recent evidence.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Cox regression models estimated the relationship between risk factors and dementia for each sex. A random-effects meta-analysis model aggregated cohort- and sex-specific regression coefficients to develop CogDrisk-ML. Harrell's C statistics measured predictability, with multiple imputation used for missing data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CogDrisk-ML outperformed CAIDE in the UK Biobank and Whitehall II cohorts; however, it provided similar C statistics in the ARIC dataset. C statistics (95% confidence interval) for CogDrisk-ML were 0.71 (0.69, 0.74) for the ARIC, 0.75 (0.73, 0.77) for the UK Biobank and 0.70 (0.62, 0.79) for the Whitehall II study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel CogDrisk-ML for assessing dementia risk in midlife offers improved predictive accuracy. Combined with the CogDrisk tool for late life, it provides a comprehensive framework for dementia prevention throughout the life course.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Age and ageing\",\"volume\":\"54 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12277239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Age and ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf201\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:现有的痴呆风险评估工具,如澳大利亚国立大学阿尔茨海默病风险指数(ANU-ADRI)、脑健康生活方式(LIBRA)和认知健康和痴呆风险评估(cogrisk),对中年人(40-64岁)的有效性有限。近20年前开发的心血管危险因素、衰老和痴呆发生率(CAIDE)工具显示出中等的预测准确性。随着关键的可改变的中年痴呆危险因素的出现,需要一种新的,更准确的中年痴呆风险评估工具。目的:开发中年痴呆风险评估工具cogrisk - ml,补充现有的老年痴呆风险评估工具cogrisk。设计和设置:使用来自UK Biobank和社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究的数据来开发和验证cogrisk - ml,并使用Whitehall II队列进行外部验证。参与者和协变量:纳入基线时无痴呆的参与者,使用cogrisk预测因子以及基于最近证据的额外中年风险因素。主要结果测量:Cox回归模型估计了不同性别的危险因素与痴呆之间的关系。随机效应荟萃分析模型汇总了队列和性别特异性回归系数来开发CogDrisk-ML。Harrell的C统计测量了可预测性,对缺失的数据使用了多重输入。结果:cogrisk - ml在UK Biobank和Whitehall II队列中的表现优于CAIDE;但是,它在ARIC数据集中提供了类似的C统计信息。cogrisk - ml的C统计量(95%置信区间)在ARIC为0.71 (0.69,0.74),UK Biobank为0.75 (0.73,0.77),Whitehall II研究为0.70(0.62,0.79)。结论:用于评估中年痴呆风险的新型cogrisk - ml可提高预测准确性。它与晚年的认知风险工具相结合,为整个生命过程中的痴呆症预防提供了一个全面的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a midlife-specific CogDrisk algorithm (CogDrisk-ML) to enable validated implementation of dementia risk assessment from midlife to late life.

Background: Existing dementia risk assessment tools, such as The Australian National University Alzheimer's Disease Risk Index (ANU-ADRI), LIfestyle for BRAin health (LIBRA) and Cognitive health and Dementia Risk Assessment (CogDrisk), show limited validation for middle-aged adults (age 40-64 years). The Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Incidence of Dementia (CAIDE) tool, developed almost two decades ago, demonstrated moderate predictive accuracy. As key modifiable dementia risk factors emerge in midlife, there is a need for a new, more accurate midlife dementia risk assessment tool.

Objectives: To develop CogDrisk-ML, a midlife dementia risk assessment tool that can complement the existing CogDrisk tool for late-life dementia risk assessment.

Design and settings: Data from the UK Biobank and the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study were used to develop and validate CogDrisk-ML, which was also externally validated using the Whitehall II cohort.

Participants and covariates: Participants without dementia at baseline were included, with CogDrisk predictors along with additional midlife risk factors based on recent evidence.

Main outcome measures: Cox regression models estimated the relationship between risk factors and dementia for each sex. A random-effects meta-analysis model aggregated cohort- and sex-specific regression coefficients to develop CogDrisk-ML. Harrell's C statistics measured predictability, with multiple imputation used for missing data.

Results: CogDrisk-ML outperformed CAIDE in the UK Biobank and Whitehall II cohorts; however, it provided similar C statistics in the ARIC dataset. C statistics (95% confidence interval) for CogDrisk-ML were 0.71 (0.69, 0.74) for the ARIC, 0.75 (0.73, 0.77) for the UK Biobank and 0.70 (0.62, 0.79) for the Whitehall II study.

Conclusion: The novel CogDrisk-ML for assessing dementia risk in midlife offers improved predictive accuracy. Combined with the CogDrisk tool for late life, it provides a comprehensive framework for dementia prevention throughout the life course.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信