{"title":"网络认知增强干预对抑郁症缓解成人主观执行功能改善的预测因素。","authors":"Sunniva Brurok Myklebost, Tine Nordgreen, Eivind Haga Ronold, Aleksander Heltne, Åsa Hammar","doi":"10.1111/acps.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Residual cognitive deficits are commonly reported by individuals in remission from depression, often affecting daily life functioning and mental health. To provide tailored and personalized cognitive enhancement interventions for this population, there is a need for a better understanding of the characteristics of those who benefit from such interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictors of changes in subjective executive functioning following an internet-delivered cognitive enhancement intervention for adults in remission from depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of an internet-delivered cognitive enhancement intervention. Changes in subjective executive functioning from pre-treatment to the six-month follow-up were assessed in 44 participants in remission from depression, using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Adult Global Executive Composite. Linear mixed model analyses were conducted to investigate the impact of demographic, clinical, and treatment credibility variables on change in subjective cognitive functioning over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that shorter lifetime depression duration predicted greater improvements in subjective executive functioning (p = 0.031). Higher levels of treatment expectancy and credibility were related to greater improvements in subjective cognitive functioning (p = 0.024). Participants with a partner showed better treatment response than those without a partner (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study builds on previous research on cognitive enhancement interventions in remitted depression, highlighting the impact of depression duration, treatment expectancy, and credibility on treatment response. Interventions targeting cognitive deficits appear most effective for those with a shorter lifetime duration of depression. Therefore, efforts should be made to enhance outcomes in those with a chronic course. To maximize engagement and outcomes, these interventions should be delivered in a way that individuals in remission from depression view them as credible and capable of reducing their deficits. Previous research has not found partner status to predict change in subjective executive functioning. The effect of partner status on treatment response should be investigated further.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of Improvement in Subjective Executive Functioning Following an Internet-Delivered Cognitive Enhancement Intervention for Adults in Remission From Depression.\",\"authors\":\"Sunniva Brurok Myklebost, Tine Nordgreen, Eivind Haga Ronold, Aleksander Heltne, Åsa Hammar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acps.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Residual cognitive deficits are commonly reported by individuals in remission from depression, often affecting daily life functioning and mental health. To provide tailored and personalized cognitive enhancement interventions for this population, there is a need for a better understanding of the characteristics of those who benefit from such interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictors of changes in subjective executive functioning following an internet-delivered cognitive enhancement intervention for adults in remission from depression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected from a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of an internet-delivered cognitive enhancement intervention. Changes in subjective executive functioning from pre-treatment to the six-month follow-up were assessed in 44 participants in remission from depression, using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Adult Global Executive Composite. Linear mixed model analyses were conducted to investigate the impact of demographic, clinical, and treatment credibility variables on change in subjective cognitive functioning over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that shorter lifetime depression duration predicted greater improvements in subjective executive functioning (p = 0.031). Higher levels of treatment expectancy and credibility were related to greater improvements in subjective cognitive functioning (p = 0.024). Participants with a partner showed better treatment response than those without a partner (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study builds on previous research on cognitive enhancement interventions in remitted depression, highlighting the impact of depression duration, treatment expectancy, and credibility on treatment response. Interventions targeting cognitive deficits appear most effective for those with a shorter lifetime duration of depression. Therefore, efforts should be made to enhance outcomes in those with a chronic course. To maximize engagement and outcomes, these interventions should be delivered in a way that individuals in remission from depression view them as credible and capable of reducing their deficits. Previous research has not found partner status to predict change in subjective executive functioning. The effect of partner status on treatment response should be investigated further.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70019\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.70019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictors of Improvement in Subjective Executive Functioning Following an Internet-Delivered Cognitive Enhancement Intervention for Adults in Remission From Depression.
Introduction: Residual cognitive deficits are commonly reported by individuals in remission from depression, often affecting daily life functioning and mental health. To provide tailored and personalized cognitive enhancement interventions for this population, there is a need for a better understanding of the characteristics of those who benefit from such interventions. Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictors of changes in subjective executive functioning following an internet-delivered cognitive enhancement intervention for adults in remission from depression.
Methods: Data were collected from a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy of an internet-delivered cognitive enhancement intervention. Changes in subjective executive functioning from pre-treatment to the six-month follow-up were assessed in 44 participants in remission from depression, using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Adult Global Executive Composite. Linear mixed model analyses were conducted to investigate the impact of demographic, clinical, and treatment credibility variables on change in subjective cognitive functioning over time.
Results: The results showed that shorter lifetime depression duration predicted greater improvements in subjective executive functioning (p = 0.031). Higher levels of treatment expectancy and credibility were related to greater improvements in subjective cognitive functioning (p = 0.024). Participants with a partner showed better treatment response than those without a partner (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study builds on previous research on cognitive enhancement interventions in remitted depression, highlighting the impact of depression duration, treatment expectancy, and credibility on treatment response. Interventions targeting cognitive deficits appear most effective for those with a shorter lifetime duration of depression. Therefore, efforts should be made to enhance outcomes in those with a chronic course. To maximize engagement and outcomes, these interventions should be delivered in a way that individuals in remission from depression view them as credible and capable of reducing their deficits. Previous research has not found partner status to predict change in subjective executive functioning. The effect of partner status on treatment response should be investigated further.
期刊介绍:
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.