Alberto Monje, Sofía Navarro-Mesa, Costanza Soldini, Giorgio Zappalá, Pedro Peña, Jose Manuel Navarro Sr., Ramón Pons
{"title":"表面去污对种植体周围炎重建治疗的影响:一项多中心随机临床试验","authors":"Alberto Monje, Sofía Navarro-Mesa, Costanza Soldini, Giorgio Zappalá, Pedro Peña, Jose Manuel Navarro Sr., Ramón Pons","doi":"10.1111/cid.70075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the clinical/radiographic outcomes and the rate of disease resolution of the adjunctive use of electrolysis (GS) or hydrogen peroxide (HP) for mechanical decontamination in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis-related intrabony defects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multicenter randomized clinical trial was designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of two strategies for the surface decontamination of crater-like and circumferential intrabony defects subjected to reconstructive therapy. Clinical evaluation was made at baseline (T<sub>0</sub>), 6 months (T<sub>1</sub>) and 12 months (T<sub>2</sub>), while radiographic assessment was carried out at T<sub>0</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>. Disease resolution was the primary outcome. Supportive therapy was administered following surgical treatment. Simple and multiple generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were applied to compare the outcomes achieved and to explore potential confounders. Post hoc power calculation was performed to validate the statistical power of the findings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 58 patients completed the study. All the clinical parameters/indices, namely probing pocket depth, modified sulcular bleeding index, suppuration grading index, and width of keratinized mucosa, showed a significant reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.001) from T<sub>0</sub> to T<sub>2</sub> in both tested groups. Mucosal recession increased (<i>p</i> < 0.001) from T<sub>0</sub> to T<sub>2</sub>. Marginal bone level and radiographic defect angle increased (<i>p</i> < 0.001) from T<sub>0</sub> to T<sub>2</sub>. The disease resolution rate was 87.5% for the GS group and 64.5% for the HP group at T<sub>2</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.08). No major postoperative complications were reported.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Both tested surface decontamination methods are effective in resolving peri-implantitis, in gaining radiographic marginal bone levels, and in enhancing clinical peri-implant conditions in the surgical reconstructive therapy (NCT05615051).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.70075","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surface Decontamination on the Reconstructive Therapy of Peri-Implantitis: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Monje, Sofía Navarro-Mesa, Costanza Soldini, Giorgio Zappalá, Pedro Peña, Jose Manuel Navarro Sr., Ramón Pons\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cid.70075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To compare the clinical/radiographic outcomes and the rate of disease resolution of the adjunctive use of electrolysis (GS) or hydrogen peroxide (HP) for mechanical decontamination in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis-related intrabony defects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A multicenter randomized clinical trial was designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of two strategies for the surface decontamination of crater-like and circumferential intrabony defects subjected to reconstructive therapy. Clinical evaluation was made at baseline (T<sub>0</sub>), 6 months (T<sub>1</sub>) and 12 months (T<sub>2</sub>), while radiographic assessment was carried out at T<sub>0</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>. Disease resolution was the primary outcome. Supportive therapy was administered following surgical treatment. Simple and multiple generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were applied to compare the outcomes achieved and to explore potential confounders. Post hoc power calculation was performed to validate the statistical power of the findings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Overall, 58 patients completed the study. All the clinical parameters/indices, namely probing pocket depth, modified sulcular bleeding index, suppuration grading index, and width of keratinized mucosa, showed a significant reduction (<i>p</i> < 0.001) from T<sub>0</sub> to T<sub>2</sub> in both tested groups. Mucosal recession increased (<i>p</i> < 0.001) from T<sub>0</sub> to T<sub>2</sub>. Marginal bone level and radiographic defect angle increased (<i>p</i> < 0.001) from T<sub>0</sub> to T<sub>2</sub>. The disease resolution rate was 87.5% for the GS group and 64.5% for the HP group at T<sub>2</sub> (<i>p</i> = 0.08). No major postoperative complications were reported.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Both tested surface decontamination methods are effective in resolving peri-implantitis, in gaining radiographic marginal bone levels, and in enhancing clinical peri-implant conditions in the surgical reconstructive therapy (NCT05615051).</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.70075\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70075\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.70075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Surface Decontamination on the Reconstructive Therapy of Peri-Implantitis: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial
Objective
To compare the clinical/radiographic outcomes and the rate of disease resolution of the adjunctive use of electrolysis (GS) or hydrogen peroxide (HP) for mechanical decontamination in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis-related intrabony defects.
Material and Methods
A multicenter randomized clinical trial was designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of two strategies for the surface decontamination of crater-like and circumferential intrabony defects subjected to reconstructive therapy. Clinical evaluation was made at baseline (T0), 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2), while radiographic assessment was carried out at T0 and T2. Disease resolution was the primary outcome. Supportive therapy was administered following surgical treatment. Simple and multiple generalized estimating equations (GEE) models were applied to compare the outcomes achieved and to explore potential confounders. Post hoc power calculation was performed to validate the statistical power of the findings.
Results
Overall, 58 patients completed the study. All the clinical parameters/indices, namely probing pocket depth, modified sulcular bleeding index, suppuration grading index, and width of keratinized mucosa, showed a significant reduction (p < 0.001) from T0 to T2 in both tested groups. Mucosal recession increased (p < 0.001) from T0 to T2. Marginal bone level and radiographic defect angle increased (p < 0.001) from T0 to T2. The disease resolution rate was 87.5% for the GS group and 64.5% for the HP group at T2 (p = 0.08). No major postoperative complications were reported.
Conclusion
Both tested surface decontamination methods are effective in resolving peri-implantitis, in gaining radiographic marginal bone levels, and in enhancing clinical peri-implant conditions in the surgical reconstructive therapy (NCT05615051).
期刊介绍:
The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal.
The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to:
New scientific developments relating to bone
Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues
Computer aided implant designs
Computer aided prosthetic designs
Immediate implant loading
Immediate implant placement
Materials relating to bone induction and conduction
New surgical methods relating to implant placement
New materials and methods relating to implant restorations
Methods for determining implant stability
A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.