利用基于ml的代理模型综合预测基于支柱的陀螺晶格结构的相对模量

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Naufal Muhammad Judawisastra, Satrio Wicaksono, Yohanes Bimo Dwianto, Andi Isra Mahyuddin, Tatacipta Dirgantara, Lavi Rizki Zuhal
{"title":"利用基于ml的代理模型综合预测基于支柱的陀螺晶格结构的相对模量","authors":"Naufal Muhammad Judawisastra,&nbsp;Satrio Wicaksono,&nbsp;Yohanes Bimo Dwianto,&nbsp;Andi Isra Mahyuddin,&nbsp;Tatacipta Dirgantara,&nbsp;Lavi Rizki Zuhal","doi":"10.1002/jbm.b.35613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Due to its porous structure, tunable properties, and nearly isotropic characteristics, the Gyroid Lattice Structure (GLS) is widely utilized in orthopedic implant applications. To effectively reduce stress shielding and enhance implant longevity, it is essential to accurately predict the GLS's elastic moduli across a broad range of relative densities for various material selections. This study conducted a comprehensive finite element analysis of strut-based GLS models, considering unit cell arrangements, a wider range of relative densities, and variations in lattice orientations to predict its relative elastic moduli. GLS models with relative densities of 10%, 30%, 50%, and 75% were experimentally tested and numerically analyzed to capture properties across a broader density range. The well-known Gibson-Ashby model and a machine learning (ML)-based surrogate model employing Gaussian Process Regression were developed to extend predictions across the full-density spectrum. The results showed that different relative densities required varying numbers of unit cells to achieve elastic modulus convergence. The improved Gibson-Ashby model provided closer predictions to experiments over a wider density range but struggled to fully capture behavior at high relative densities near bulk material properties. In contrast, the ML-based surrogate model accurately predicts elastic moduli across the entire relative density range. Compared to experimental results, this approach demonstrates greater accuracy in predicting the elastic modulus of GLS, with reduced error compared to other methods. These findings are particularly valuable for optimizing implant and scaffold designs, as accurate modulus predictions contribute to improved performance and longevity, helping to mitigate the stress-shielding effect.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15269,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","volume":"113 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Prediction of the Relative Modulus of Strut-Based Gyroid Lattice Structures Employing an ML-Based Surrogate Model\",\"authors\":\"Naufal Muhammad Judawisastra,&nbsp;Satrio Wicaksono,&nbsp;Yohanes Bimo Dwianto,&nbsp;Andi Isra Mahyuddin,&nbsp;Tatacipta Dirgantara,&nbsp;Lavi Rizki Zuhal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jbm.b.35613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Due to its porous structure, tunable properties, and nearly isotropic characteristics, the Gyroid Lattice Structure (GLS) is widely utilized in orthopedic implant applications. To effectively reduce stress shielding and enhance implant longevity, it is essential to accurately predict the GLS's elastic moduli across a broad range of relative densities for various material selections. This study conducted a comprehensive finite element analysis of strut-based GLS models, considering unit cell arrangements, a wider range of relative densities, and variations in lattice orientations to predict its relative elastic moduli. GLS models with relative densities of 10%, 30%, 50%, and 75% were experimentally tested and numerically analyzed to capture properties across a broader density range. The well-known Gibson-Ashby model and a machine learning (ML)-based surrogate model employing Gaussian Process Regression were developed to extend predictions across the full-density spectrum. The results showed that different relative densities required varying numbers of unit cells to achieve elastic modulus convergence. The improved Gibson-Ashby model provided closer predictions to experiments over a wider density range but struggled to fully capture behavior at high relative densities near bulk material properties. In contrast, the ML-based surrogate model accurately predicts elastic moduli across the entire relative density range. Compared to experimental results, this approach demonstrates greater accuracy in predicting the elastic modulus of GLS, with reduced error compared to other methods. These findings are particularly valuable for optimizing implant and scaffold designs, as accurate modulus predictions contribute to improved performance and longevity, helping to mitigate the stress-shielding effect.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials\",\"volume\":\"113 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35613\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jbm.b.35613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于其多孔结构、可调性能和近各向同性的特点,陀螺晶格结构(GLS)在骨科植入物中得到了广泛的应用。为了有效地减少应力屏蔽并延长种植体寿命,在各种材料选择的相对密度范围内准确预测GLS的弹性模量至关重要。本研究对基于支柱的GLS模型进行了全面的有限元分析,考虑了单元格排列、更宽的相对密度范围和晶格方向的变化,以预测其相对弹性模量。分别对相对密度为10%、30%、50%和75%的GLS模型进行了实验测试和数值分析,以捕获更宽密度范围内的特性。开发了著名的Gibson-Ashby模型和基于机器学习(ML)的代理模型,采用高斯过程回归来扩展全密度谱的预测。结果表明,不同的相对密度需要不同的单元胞数来实现弹性模量收敛。改进的Gibson-Ashby模型在更宽的密度范围内提供了更接近实验的预测,但难以完全捕捉到接近大块材料特性的高相对密度下的行为。相比之下,基于ml的替代模型可以准确地预测整个相对密度范围内的弹性模量。与实验结果相比,该方法在预测GLS弹性模量方面具有更高的准确性,且与其他方法相比误差较小。这些发现对于优化植入物和支架设计特别有价值,因为准确的模量预测有助于提高性能和寿命,有助于减轻应力屏蔽效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive Prediction of the Relative Modulus of Strut-Based Gyroid Lattice Structures Employing an ML-Based Surrogate Model

Due to its porous structure, tunable properties, and nearly isotropic characteristics, the Gyroid Lattice Structure (GLS) is widely utilized in orthopedic implant applications. To effectively reduce stress shielding and enhance implant longevity, it is essential to accurately predict the GLS's elastic moduli across a broad range of relative densities for various material selections. This study conducted a comprehensive finite element analysis of strut-based GLS models, considering unit cell arrangements, a wider range of relative densities, and variations in lattice orientations to predict its relative elastic moduli. GLS models with relative densities of 10%, 30%, 50%, and 75% were experimentally tested and numerically analyzed to capture properties across a broader density range. The well-known Gibson-Ashby model and a machine learning (ML)-based surrogate model employing Gaussian Process Regression were developed to extend predictions across the full-density spectrum. The results showed that different relative densities required varying numbers of unit cells to achieve elastic modulus convergence. The improved Gibson-Ashby model provided closer predictions to experiments over a wider density range but struggled to fully capture behavior at high relative densities near bulk material properties. In contrast, the ML-based surrogate model accurately predicts elastic moduli across the entire relative density range. Compared to experimental results, this approach demonstrates greater accuracy in predicting the elastic modulus of GLS, with reduced error compared to other methods. These findings are particularly valuable for optimizing implant and scaffold designs, as accurate modulus predictions contribute to improved performance and longevity, helping to mitigate the stress-shielding effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
199
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is a highly interdisciplinary peer-reviewed journal serving the needs of biomaterials professionals who design, develop, produce and apply biomaterials and medical devices. It has the common focus of biomaterials applied to the human body and covers all disciplines where medical devices are used. Papers are published on biomaterials related to medical device development and manufacture, degradation in the body, nano- and biomimetic- biomaterials interactions, mechanics of biomaterials, implant retrieval and analysis, tissue-biomaterial surface interactions, wound healing, infection, drug delivery, standards and regulation of devices, animal and pre-clinical studies of biomaterials and medical devices, and tissue-biopolymer-material combination products. Manuscripts are published in one of six formats: • original research reports • short research and development reports • scientific reviews • current concepts articles • special reports • editorials Journal of Biomedical Materials Research – Part B: Applied Biomaterials is an official journal of the Society for Biomaterials, Japanese Society for Biomaterials, the Australasian Society for Biomaterials, and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. Manuscripts from all countries are invited but must be in English. Authors are not required to be members of the affiliated Societies, but members of these societies are encouraged to submit their work to the journal for consideration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信