磺胺氮嗪和托法替尼治疗非甾体抗炎药难治性反应性关节炎的短期疗效:一项观察性研究

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Prakashini Mruthyunjaya, Debashis Maikap, Sakir Ahmed, Ramnath Misra, Prasanta Padhan
{"title":"磺胺氮嗪和托法替尼治疗非甾体抗炎药难治性反应性关节炎的短期疗效:一项观察性研究","authors":"Prakashini Mruthyunjaya,&nbsp;Debashis Maikap,&nbsp;Sakir Ahmed,&nbsp;Ramnath Misra,&nbsp;Prasanta Padhan","doi":"10.1111/1756-185x.70370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Reactive arthritis (ReA) is a lower-limb predominant oligoarthritis that follows genitourinary or gastrointestinal infection with a 2–4 week latency. Up to 40% can progress to chronicity. There is no approved disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug for ReA yet.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fifty consecutive patients of ReA, defined by Braun criteria, refractory to NSAIDs were included, with 25 in each group (Sulfasalazine group, tofacitinib group). Forty-six patients completed the study. The primary endpoint was DAREA (Disease Activity Index for the Assessment of Reactive Arthritis) at week 12 between the two groups. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and no response (NR) were defined based on DAREA of ≤ 5, 6–10, and &gt; 10, respectively. Secondary endpoints were pain VAS, ESR, CRP, BASFI, MASES, and ASDAS-CRP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 46 patients who completed the study, 70% were males, with HLA-B27 positivity in 65%. Twenty-one received sulfasalazine and 25, tofacitinib. The median DAREA at 12 weeks [3.35 (IQR: 2.77–9.18) vs. 3.05 (IQR: 2.69, 8.45), respectively)] was comparable between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.545). The decline in CRP, ESR, and DAREA was quicker in the tofacitinib group (by week 4). Change from baseline to 12 weeks in DAREA and the secondary endpoints was statistically significant within both groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). 25% of patients in the tofacitinib group and 18.2% in the sulfasalazine group had NR. There were no serious adverse events in either group by week 12.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Sulfasalazine and tofacitinib showed comparable effectiveness and safety in NSAID-refractory ReA at 12 weeks, with tofacitinib exhibiting a more rapid onset of therapeutic response.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14330,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","volume":"28 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-Term Effectiveness of Sulfasalazine and Tofacitinib in NSAID-Refractory Reactive Arthritis: An Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"Prakashini Mruthyunjaya,&nbsp;Debashis Maikap,&nbsp;Sakir Ahmed,&nbsp;Ramnath Misra,&nbsp;Prasanta Padhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1756-185x.70370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Reactive arthritis (ReA) is a lower-limb predominant oligoarthritis that follows genitourinary or gastrointestinal infection with a 2–4 week latency. Up to 40% can progress to chronicity. There is no approved disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug for ReA yet.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fifty consecutive patients of ReA, defined by Braun criteria, refractory to NSAIDs were included, with 25 in each group (Sulfasalazine group, tofacitinib group). Forty-six patients completed the study. The primary endpoint was DAREA (Disease Activity Index for the Assessment of Reactive Arthritis) at week 12 between the two groups. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and no response (NR) were defined based on DAREA of ≤ 5, 6–10, and &gt; 10, respectively. Secondary endpoints were pain VAS, ESR, CRP, BASFI, MASES, and ASDAS-CRP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 46 patients who completed the study, 70% were males, with HLA-B27 positivity in 65%. Twenty-one received sulfasalazine and 25, tofacitinib. The median DAREA at 12 weeks [3.35 (IQR: 2.77–9.18) vs. 3.05 (IQR: 2.69, 8.45), respectively)] was comparable between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.545). The decline in CRP, ESR, and DAREA was quicker in the tofacitinib group (by week 4). Change from baseline to 12 weeks in DAREA and the secondary endpoints was statistically significant within both groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). 25% of patients in the tofacitinib group and 18.2% in the sulfasalazine group had NR. There were no serious adverse events in either group by week 12.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sulfasalazine and tofacitinib showed comparable effectiveness and safety in NSAID-refractory ReA at 12 weeks, with tofacitinib exhibiting a more rapid onset of therapeutic response.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\"28 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185x.70370\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185x.70370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

反应性关节炎(ReA)是一种以下肢为主的寡关节炎,继发于泌尿生殖系统或胃肠道感染,潜伏期为2-4周。高达40%的患者可发展为慢性疾病。目前还没有批准的用于ReA的改善疾病的抗风湿药物。方法采用Braun标准对非甾体抗炎药难治的ReA患者50例,每组25例(磺胺氮嗪组、托法替尼组)。46名患者完成了这项研究。主要终点是两组患者在第12周时的DAREA(评估反应性关节炎的疾病活动指数)。完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解(PR)和无缓解(NR)分别根据DAREA≤5、6-10和>; 10来定义。次要终点为疼痛VAS、ESR、CRP、BASFI、MASES和ASDAS-CRP。结果在完成研究的46例患者中,70%为男性,65%为HLA-B27阳性。21人接受柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗,25人接受托法替尼治疗。两组12周时的DAREA中位数[分别为3.35 (IQR: 2.77-9.18)和3.05 (IQR: 2.69, 8.45)]具有可比性(p = 0.545)。托法替尼组CRP、ESR和DAREA下降更快(到第4周)。DAREA和次要终点从基线到12周的变化在两组中都有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。托法替尼组和柳氮磺胺嘧啶组分别有25%和18.2%的患者发生NR。截至第12周,两组均无严重不良事件发生。结论磺胺氮嗪和托法替尼在非甾体抗炎药难治性ReA治疗12周时的有效性和安全性相当,托法替尼表现出更快的治疗反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-Term Effectiveness of Sulfasalazine and Tofacitinib in NSAID-Refractory Reactive Arthritis: An Observational Study

Background

Reactive arthritis (ReA) is a lower-limb predominant oligoarthritis that follows genitourinary or gastrointestinal infection with a 2–4 week latency. Up to 40% can progress to chronicity. There is no approved disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug for ReA yet.

Methods

Fifty consecutive patients of ReA, defined by Braun criteria, refractory to NSAIDs were included, with 25 in each group (Sulfasalazine group, tofacitinib group). Forty-six patients completed the study. The primary endpoint was DAREA (Disease Activity Index for the Assessment of Reactive Arthritis) at week 12 between the two groups. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and no response (NR) were defined based on DAREA of ≤ 5, 6–10, and > 10, respectively. Secondary endpoints were pain VAS, ESR, CRP, BASFI, MASES, and ASDAS-CRP.

Results

Of the 46 patients who completed the study, 70% were males, with HLA-B27 positivity in 65%. Twenty-one received sulfasalazine and 25, tofacitinib. The median DAREA at 12 weeks [3.35 (IQR: 2.77–9.18) vs. 3.05 (IQR: 2.69, 8.45), respectively)] was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.545). The decline in CRP, ESR, and DAREA was quicker in the tofacitinib group (by week 4). Change from baseline to 12 weeks in DAREA and the secondary endpoints was statistically significant within both groups (p < 0.001). 25% of patients in the tofacitinib group and 18.2% in the sulfasalazine group had NR. There were no serious adverse events in either group by week 12.

Conclusion

Sulfasalazine and tofacitinib showed comparable effectiveness and safety in NSAID-refractory ReA at 12 weeks, with tofacitinib exhibiting a more rapid onset of therapeutic response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
362
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases (formerly APLAR Journal of Rheumatology) is the official journal of the Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology. The Journal accepts original articles on clinical or experimental research pertinent to the rheumatic diseases, work on connective tissue diseases and other immune and allergic disorders. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and its significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer reviewed by two anonymous reviewers and the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信