Yan Li, Tian-tian Feng, Jia-jie Kong, Xian-yue Shen
{"title":"碳边界调整机制作为贸易转移机制:中欧贸易响应的GTAP模拟","authors":"Yan Li, Tian-tian Feng, Jia-jie Kong, Xian-yue Shen","doi":"10.1155/er/5520202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Amid global climate challenges, the European Union’s (EU) Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) raises concerns over trade competitiveness and carbon leakage. This study integrates input–output theory and a recursively dynamic GTAP model, utilizing the 2020 Environmental Extended Input–Output Table and GTAP 11 database, to quantify direct and indirect carbon emissions across CBAM-covered sectors. Innovatively incorporating dynamic updates and multidimensional scenarios (varying CBAM tax rates, Scope 1/2 emissions), we assess CBAM’s impacts on China–EU trade. The analysis reveals that CBAM has a negative impact on Chinese export commodity prices, export volumes, and trade conditions, with a higher tax rate leading to a more significant adverse effect on Chinese export trade. CBAM significantly reduces China’s export prices (−6.56 × 10<sup>−7</sup>% under a $424/ton tax) and volumes (−12.5% decline), while marginally improving EU export prices (up to 1.14 × 10<sup>−5</sup>%) but exacerbating global trade contraction (−50% for non-EU regions). Sectoral heterogeneity highlights vulnerabilities in energy-intensive industries. Findings underscore CBAM’s asymmetric trade effects, urging policy coordination to mitigate adverse global impacts.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14051,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Energy Research","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/5520202","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as a Trade Shifter: GTAP Simulations of China–EU Trade Response\",\"authors\":\"Yan Li, Tian-tian Feng, Jia-jie Kong, Xian-yue Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/er/5520202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Amid global climate challenges, the European Union’s (EU) Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) raises concerns over trade competitiveness and carbon leakage. This study integrates input–output theory and a recursively dynamic GTAP model, utilizing the 2020 Environmental Extended Input–Output Table and GTAP 11 database, to quantify direct and indirect carbon emissions across CBAM-covered sectors. Innovatively incorporating dynamic updates and multidimensional scenarios (varying CBAM tax rates, Scope 1/2 emissions), we assess CBAM’s impacts on China–EU trade. The analysis reveals that CBAM has a negative impact on Chinese export commodity prices, export volumes, and trade conditions, with a higher tax rate leading to a more significant adverse effect on Chinese export trade. CBAM significantly reduces China’s export prices (−6.56 × 10<sup>−7</sup>% under a $424/ton tax) and volumes (−12.5% decline), while marginally improving EU export prices (up to 1.14 × 10<sup>−5</sup>%) but exacerbating global trade contraction (−50% for non-EU regions). Sectoral heterogeneity highlights vulnerabilities in energy-intensive industries. Findings underscore CBAM’s asymmetric trade effects, urging policy coordination to mitigate adverse global impacts.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Energy Research\",\"volume\":\"2025 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/er/5520202\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Energy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/5520202\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Energy Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/er/5520202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism as a Trade Shifter: GTAP Simulations of China–EU Trade Response
Amid global climate challenges, the European Union’s (EU) Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) raises concerns over trade competitiveness and carbon leakage. This study integrates input–output theory and a recursively dynamic GTAP model, utilizing the 2020 Environmental Extended Input–Output Table and GTAP 11 database, to quantify direct and indirect carbon emissions across CBAM-covered sectors. Innovatively incorporating dynamic updates and multidimensional scenarios (varying CBAM tax rates, Scope 1/2 emissions), we assess CBAM’s impacts on China–EU trade. The analysis reveals that CBAM has a negative impact on Chinese export commodity prices, export volumes, and trade conditions, with a higher tax rate leading to a more significant adverse effect on Chinese export trade. CBAM significantly reduces China’s export prices (−6.56 × 10−7% under a $424/ton tax) and volumes (−12.5% decline), while marginally improving EU export prices (up to 1.14 × 10−5%) but exacerbating global trade contraction (−50% for non-EU regions). Sectoral heterogeneity highlights vulnerabilities in energy-intensive industries. Findings underscore CBAM’s asymmetric trade effects, urging policy coordination to mitigate adverse global impacts.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Energy Research (IJER) is dedicated to providing a multidisciplinary, unique platform for researchers, scientists, engineers, technology developers, planners, and policy makers to present their research results and findings in a compelling manner on novel energy systems and applications. IJER covers the entire spectrum of energy from production to conversion, conservation, management, systems, technologies, etc. We encourage papers submissions aiming at better efficiency, cost improvements, more effective resource use, improved design and analysis, reduced environmental impact, and hence leading to better sustainability.
IJER is concerned with the development and exploitation of both advanced traditional and new energy sources, systems, technologies and applications. Interdisciplinary subjects in the area of novel energy systems and applications are also encouraged. High-quality research papers are solicited in, but are not limited to, the following areas with innovative and novel contents:
-Biofuels and alternatives
-Carbon capturing and storage technologies
-Clean coal technologies
-Energy conversion, conservation and management
-Energy storage
-Energy systems
-Hybrid/combined/integrated energy systems for multi-generation
-Hydrogen energy and fuel cells
-Hydrogen production technologies
-Micro- and nano-energy systems and technologies
-Nuclear energy
-Renewable energies (e.g. geothermal, solar, wind, hydro, tidal, wave, biomass)
-Smart energy system