迈向可持续循环经济的多层塑料薄膜:生命周期和技术经济评估,重点是报废处理和多重回收周期

IF 9.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Farshid Nazemi , Rebecca Hanes , Rachmat Mulyana , Jose Castro , Saikrishna Mukkamala , Todd Hyche , Bhavik R. Bakshi
{"title":"迈向可持续循环经济的多层塑料薄膜:生命周期和技术经济评估,重点是报废处理和多重回收周期","authors":"Farshid Nazemi ,&nbsp;Rebecca Hanes ,&nbsp;Rachmat Mulyana ,&nbsp;Jose Castro ,&nbsp;Saikrishna Mukkamala ,&nbsp;Todd Hyche ,&nbsp;Bhavik R. Bakshi","doi":"10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) of end-of-life technologies for treating polyethylene–polyamide barrier film waste, focusing on quality degradation across recovery cycles. Novel treatment methods are experimentally validated, while others are drawn from literature and industry consultations. A displacement approach, assuming no quality loss, is first applied. Results show that solvent-based recycling via the solvent-targeted recovery and precipitation (STRAP) process outperforms alternatives across environmental indicators, reducing global warming potential (GWP) by 40% compared to landfilling. Incineration performs worst in most categories, particularly eutrophication (80% higher than landfilling), due to nitrogen emissions. Experimentally validated downcycling (pelletizing) proves more economically viable. The assumption of infinite recoverability is overly optimistic. To address this, we propose a mathematical framework accounting for a finite number of recovery cycles. This refined model shows reduced GWP and cost savings for solvent recovery, making its benefits less pronounced than initially estimated. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses reveal strong dependence on recovered material quality and solvent recovery efficiency, underscoring the need for optimized process design. Finally, hotspot analysis identifies greenhouse gas emissions from the polyamide supply chain as the dominant GWP contributor. The results underscore potential trade-offs across pathways and show that solvent-based recovery’s sustainability depends heavily on process conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22097,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Materials and Technologies","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article e01526"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a sustainable circular economy of multilayer plastic films: Life cycle and techno-economic assessment with a focus on end-of-life treatment and multiple recovery cycles\",\"authors\":\"Farshid Nazemi ,&nbsp;Rebecca Hanes ,&nbsp;Rachmat Mulyana ,&nbsp;Jose Castro ,&nbsp;Saikrishna Mukkamala ,&nbsp;Todd Hyche ,&nbsp;Bhavik R. Bakshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.susmat.2025.e01526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) of end-of-life technologies for treating polyethylene–polyamide barrier film waste, focusing on quality degradation across recovery cycles. Novel treatment methods are experimentally validated, while others are drawn from literature and industry consultations. A displacement approach, assuming no quality loss, is first applied. Results show that solvent-based recycling via the solvent-targeted recovery and precipitation (STRAP) process outperforms alternatives across environmental indicators, reducing global warming potential (GWP) by 40% compared to landfilling. Incineration performs worst in most categories, particularly eutrophication (80% higher than landfilling), due to nitrogen emissions. Experimentally validated downcycling (pelletizing) proves more economically viable. The assumption of infinite recoverability is overly optimistic. To address this, we propose a mathematical framework accounting for a finite number of recovery cycles. This refined model shows reduced GWP and cost savings for solvent recovery, making its benefits less pronounced than initially estimated. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses reveal strong dependence on recovered material quality and solvent recovery efficiency, underscoring the need for optimized process design. Finally, hotspot analysis identifies greenhouse gas emissions from the polyamide supply chain as the dominant GWP contributor. The results underscore potential trade-offs across pathways and show that solvent-based recovery’s sustainability depends heavily on process conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Materials and Technologies\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article e01526\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Materials and Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214993725002945\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Materials and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214993725002945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了处理聚乙烯聚酰胺屏障膜废物的生命周期评估(LCA)和技术经济分析(TEA),重点关注回收周期中的质量退化。新的处理方法经过实验验证,而其他方法则来自文献和行业咨询。假设没有质量损失,首先应用位移法。结果表明,通过溶剂定向回收和沉淀(STRAP)工艺进行的溶剂基回收在环境指标上优于替代方案,与填埋相比,将全球变暖潜能值(GWP)降低了40%。由于氮排放,焚烧在大多数类别中表现最差,特别是富营养化(比填埋高80%)。经实验验证的降循环(球团化)在经济上更可行。无限可恢复性的假设过于乐观。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一个数学框架来解释有限数量的恢复周期。经过改进的模型显示,溶剂回收降低了全球潜能值,节约了成本,使其效益不如最初估计的那么明显。灵敏度和不确定度分析表明,回收材料质量和溶剂回收率对该方法的影响很大,因此需要优化工艺设计。最后,热点分析表明,聚酰胺供应链的温室气体排放是全球变暖潜能值的主要贡献者。结果强调了不同途径之间的潜在权衡,并表明溶剂基回收的可持续性在很大程度上取决于工艺条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a sustainable circular economy of multilayer plastic films: Life cycle and techno-economic assessment with a focus on end-of-life treatment and multiple recovery cycles
This study presents a life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA) of end-of-life technologies for treating polyethylene–polyamide barrier film waste, focusing on quality degradation across recovery cycles. Novel treatment methods are experimentally validated, while others are drawn from literature and industry consultations. A displacement approach, assuming no quality loss, is first applied. Results show that solvent-based recycling via the solvent-targeted recovery and precipitation (STRAP) process outperforms alternatives across environmental indicators, reducing global warming potential (GWP) by 40% compared to landfilling. Incineration performs worst in most categories, particularly eutrophication (80% higher than landfilling), due to nitrogen emissions. Experimentally validated downcycling (pelletizing) proves more economically viable. The assumption of infinite recoverability is overly optimistic. To address this, we propose a mathematical framework accounting for a finite number of recovery cycles. This refined model shows reduced GWP and cost savings for solvent recovery, making its benefits less pronounced than initially estimated. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses reveal strong dependence on recovered material quality and solvent recovery efficiency, underscoring the need for optimized process design. Finally, hotspot analysis identifies greenhouse gas emissions from the polyamide supply chain as the dominant GWP contributor. The results underscore potential trade-offs across pathways and show that solvent-based recovery’s sustainability depends heavily on process conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Materials and Technologies
Sustainable Materials and Technologies Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
158
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Materials and Technologies (SM&T), an international, cross-disciplinary, fully open access journal published by Elsevier, focuses on original full-length research articles and reviews. It covers applied or fundamental science of nano-, micro-, meso-, and macro-scale aspects of materials and technologies for sustainable development. SM&T gives special attention to contributions that bridge the knowledge gap between materials and system designs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信