弥合bb0和数字资产差距:新兴市场监管实践的比较政策分析

IET Blockchain Pub Date : 2025-07-22 DOI:10.1049/blc2.70019
Ian Staley, Eric Amankwa
{"title":"弥合bb0和数字资产差距:新兴市场监管实践的比较政策分析","authors":"Ian Staley,&nbsp;Eric Amankwa","doi":"10.1049/blc2.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Regulatory frameworks play a large part in the effectiveness of blockchain adoption. This study focused on determining the regulatory policies that promote the growth of blockchain adoption and analysing the impact of these regulatory approaches on blockchain adoption in finance sectors in emerging markets. The study used a comparative policy analysis to compare policies and regulations from chosen emerging markets. The countries included in the analysis are China, India, Kenya, Nigeria, Albania and Turkey. The findings suggest a correlation between supportive policy environments, such as those in Turkey, Albania and India, and more advanced applications of blockchain technology; however, this relationship is likely influenced by additional factors, including economic capacity, institutional readiness and technological infrastructure. In contrast, countries with restrictive policies, such as Kenya and Nigeria, ranked lower in blockchain adoption in the finance sector. Accordingly, a unified approach to blockchain regulations and cooperation between participating stakeholders is recommended. This study was limited in that only a few countries were chosen for analysis, which could have limited the scope of the comparative analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":100650,"journal":{"name":"IET Blockchain","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/blc2.70019","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Blockchain and Digital Asset Gaps: A Comparative Policy Analysis of Regulatory Practices in Emerging Markets\",\"authors\":\"Ian Staley,&nbsp;Eric Amankwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/blc2.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Regulatory frameworks play a large part in the effectiveness of blockchain adoption. This study focused on determining the regulatory policies that promote the growth of blockchain adoption and analysing the impact of these regulatory approaches on blockchain adoption in finance sectors in emerging markets. The study used a comparative policy analysis to compare policies and regulations from chosen emerging markets. The countries included in the analysis are China, India, Kenya, Nigeria, Albania and Turkey. The findings suggest a correlation between supportive policy environments, such as those in Turkey, Albania and India, and more advanced applications of blockchain technology; however, this relationship is likely influenced by additional factors, including economic capacity, institutional readiness and technological infrastructure. In contrast, countries with restrictive policies, such as Kenya and Nigeria, ranked lower in blockchain adoption in the finance sector. Accordingly, a unified approach to blockchain regulations and cooperation between participating stakeholders is recommended. This study was limited in that only a few countries were chosen for analysis, which could have limited the scope of the comparative analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Blockchain\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1049/blc2.70019\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Blockchain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/blc2.70019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Blockchain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/blc2.70019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

监管框架在bbb采用的有效性方面发挥着重要作用。本研究的重点是确定促进bb1采用增长的监管政策,并分析这些监管方法对新兴市场金融部门bb1采用的影响。该研究采用比较政策分析来比较选定的新兴市场的政策和法规。这些国家包括中国、印度、肯尼亚、尼日利亚、阿尔巴尼亚和土耳其。研究结果表明,支持性政策环境(如土耳其、阿尔巴尼亚和印度的政策环境)与区块链技术的更先进应用之间存在相关性;然而,这种关系可能受到其他因素的影响,包括经济能力、体制准备和技术基础设施。相比之下,实行限制性政策的国家,如肯尼亚和尼日利亚,在金融行业的bb100采用率方面排名较低。因此,建议采取统一的方法来制定区块链法规,并在参与的利益相关者之间进行合作。这项研究的局限性在于只选择了少数几个国家进行分析,这可能限制了比较分析的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bridging Blockchain and Digital Asset Gaps: A Comparative Policy Analysis of Regulatory Practices in Emerging Markets

Bridging Blockchain and Digital Asset Gaps: A Comparative Policy Analysis of Regulatory Practices in Emerging Markets

Regulatory frameworks play a large part in the effectiveness of blockchain adoption. This study focused on determining the regulatory policies that promote the growth of blockchain adoption and analysing the impact of these regulatory approaches on blockchain adoption in finance sectors in emerging markets. The study used a comparative policy analysis to compare policies and regulations from chosen emerging markets. The countries included in the analysis are China, India, Kenya, Nigeria, Albania and Turkey. The findings suggest a correlation between supportive policy environments, such as those in Turkey, Albania and India, and more advanced applications of blockchain technology; however, this relationship is likely influenced by additional factors, including economic capacity, institutional readiness and technological infrastructure. In contrast, countries with restrictive policies, such as Kenya and Nigeria, ranked lower in blockchain adoption in the finance sector. Accordingly, a unified approach to blockchain regulations and cooperation between participating stakeholders is recommended. This study was limited in that only a few countries were chosen for analysis, which could have limited the scope of the comparative analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信