{"title":"劳动力市场的自愿质量披露","authors":"Tom Lane , Minghai Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We study the transmission by jobseekers to prospective employers of information about their own quality. Data from the UK website Monster.co.uk suggests around one-third-of recent graduates opt not to reveal their degree classification, an important measure of academic quality, to employers. To test how employers react to such non-disclosure, we ran a natural field experiment. We constructed CVs supposedly belonging to recent graduates and varied the information provided about their degree classifications. The CVs were used to make 12,301 applications for graduate jobs advertised on Monster.co.uk between 2019 and 2021, with success measured by the rate of positive responses from employers. Applications leaving classification undisclosed were significantly more successful than those disclosing the lowest possible classification. This suggests limited adverse inference is drawn from missing information. We discuss our results with reference to classic ‘unravelling’ theory, in which undisclosed information is treated with full scepticism and all but the very worst quality information is voluntarily transmitted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 107152"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voluntary quality disclosure in the Labour market\",\"authors\":\"Tom Lane , Minghai Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jebo.2025.107152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We study the transmission by jobseekers to prospective employers of information about their own quality. Data from the UK website Monster.co.uk suggests around one-third-of recent graduates opt not to reveal their degree classification, an important measure of academic quality, to employers. To test how employers react to such non-disclosure, we ran a natural field experiment. We constructed CVs supposedly belonging to recent graduates and varied the information provided about their degree classifications. The CVs were used to make 12,301 applications for graduate jobs advertised on Monster.co.uk between 2019 and 2021, with success measured by the rate of positive responses from employers. Applications leaving classification undisclosed were significantly more successful than those disclosing the lowest possible classification. This suggests limited adverse inference is drawn from missing information. We discuss our results with reference to classic ‘unravelling’ theory, in which undisclosed information is treated with full scepticism and all but the very worst quality information is voluntarily transmitted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"volume\":\"237 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125002719\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268125002719","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
We study the transmission by jobseekers to prospective employers of information about their own quality. Data from the UK website Monster.co.uk suggests around one-third-of recent graduates opt not to reveal their degree classification, an important measure of academic quality, to employers. To test how employers react to such non-disclosure, we ran a natural field experiment. We constructed CVs supposedly belonging to recent graduates and varied the information provided about their degree classifications. The CVs were used to make 12,301 applications for graduate jobs advertised on Monster.co.uk between 2019 and 2021, with success measured by the rate of positive responses from employers. Applications leaving classification undisclosed were significantly more successful than those disclosing the lowest possible classification. This suggests limited adverse inference is drawn from missing information. We discuss our results with reference to classic ‘unravelling’ theory, in which undisclosed information is treated with full scepticism and all but the very worst quality information is voluntarily transmitted.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization is devoted to theoretical and empirical research concerning economic decision, organization and behavior and to economic change in all its aspects. Its specific purposes are to foster an improved understanding of how human cognitive, computational and informational characteristics influence the working of economic organizations and market economies and how an economy structural features lead to various types of micro and macro behavior, to changing patterns of development and to institutional evolution. Research with these purposes that explore the interrelations of economics with other disciplines such as biology, psychology, law, anthropology, sociology and mathematics is particularly welcome.