{"title":"债权与创新:来自准自然实验的证据","authors":"Aaraadhya Srivastava","doi":"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In 2016, the Government of India (GoI) implemented the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), a reform aimed at enhancing creditor rights by enabling creditors to swiftly ‘seize’ and ‘liquidate’ a defaulter’s assets within a defined timeframe. This reform was designed to strengthen creditor protections in India. Our study examines the impact of this reform on firm-level innovation. We hypothesize that creditor-friendly reforms improve access to debt capital, thereby encouraging firms to intensify their innovation activities. Utilizing an entropy-balanced difference-in-differences (Entropy-DiD) approach and leveraging pre-reform variation in firms’ ‘proportion of debt’ for identification, we find that firms with a lower pre-reform ‘proportion of debt’ increased their R&D investment by 29.4 % more than firms with a higher pre-reform ‘proportion of debt’ in the post-IBC period. Supporting our baseline result, we further document that this effect is stronger among more profitable firms within the ‘treated’ group. Our findings are robust to firm-level time-varying control variables, fixed effects for firm and industry by year, and a placebo test using a fictitious IBC promulgation year. These results indicate that stronger creditor rights foster an environment conducive to risk-taking, encouraging firms to pursue ventures that, while risky, hold significant potential for profitability. Consequently, our research highlights the welfare implications of creditor-friendly bankruptcy reforms, providing insights that could inform future policy decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","volume":"21 3","pages":"Article 100496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creditor rights and innovation: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment\",\"authors\":\"Aaraadhya Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcae.2025.100496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In 2016, the Government of India (GoI) implemented the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), a reform aimed at enhancing creditor rights by enabling creditors to swiftly ‘seize’ and ‘liquidate’ a defaulter’s assets within a defined timeframe. This reform was designed to strengthen creditor protections in India. Our study examines the impact of this reform on firm-level innovation. We hypothesize that creditor-friendly reforms improve access to debt capital, thereby encouraging firms to intensify their innovation activities. Utilizing an entropy-balanced difference-in-differences (Entropy-DiD) approach and leveraging pre-reform variation in firms’ ‘proportion of debt’ for identification, we find that firms with a lower pre-reform ‘proportion of debt’ increased their R&D investment by 29.4 % more than firms with a higher pre-reform ‘proportion of debt’ in the post-IBC period. Supporting our baseline result, we further document that this effect is stronger among more profitable firms within the ‘treated’ group. Our findings are robust to firm-level time-varying control variables, fixed effects for firm and industry by year, and a placebo test using a fictitious IBC promulgation year. These results indicate that stronger creditor rights foster an environment conducive to risk-taking, encouraging firms to pursue ventures that, while risky, hold significant potential for profitability. Consequently, our research highlights the welfare implications of creditor-friendly bankruptcy reforms, providing insights that could inform future policy decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics\",\"volume\":\"21 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566925000438\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1815566925000438","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Creditor rights and innovation: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
In 2016, the Government of India (GoI) implemented the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), a reform aimed at enhancing creditor rights by enabling creditors to swiftly ‘seize’ and ‘liquidate’ a defaulter’s assets within a defined timeframe. This reform was designed to strengthen creditor protections in India. Our study examines the impact of this reform on firm-level innovation. We hypothesize that creditor-friendly reforms improve access to debt capital, thereby encouraging firms to intensify their innovation activities. Utilizing an entropy-balanced difference-in-differences (Entropy-DiD) approach and leveraging pre-reform variation in firms’ ‘proportion of debt’ for identification, we find that firms with a lower pre-reform ‘proportion of debt’ increased their R&D investment by 29.4 % more than firms with a higher pre-reform ‘proportion of debt’ in the post-IBC period. Supporting our baseline result, we further document that this effect is stronger among more profitable firms within the ‘treated’ group. Our findings are robust to firm-level time-varying control variables, fixed effects for firm and industry by year, and a placebo test using a fictitious IBC promulgation year. These results indicate that stronger creditor rights foster an environment conducive to risk-taking, encouraging firms to pursue ventures that, while risky, hold significant potential for profitability. Consequently, our research highlights the welfare implications of creditor-friendly bankruptcy reforms, providing insights that could inform future policy decisions.