滋养层嵌合的数字估计在全基因组无细胞胎儿DNA筛选中的诊断价值。

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Geert A Martens,Dieter De Smet,Guy Froyen,Koen Swaerts,Annick Daniels,Elke Boone,Pieter-Jan Volders,Katrien De Mulder,Ellen Geerdens,Severine Berden,Jense Wils,Pauline Herroelen,Henk Louagie,Brigitte Maes
{"title":"滋养层嵌合的数字估计在全基因组无细胞胎儿DNA筛选中的诊断价值。","authors":"Geert A Martens,Dieter De Smet,Guy Froyen,Koen Swaerts,Annick Daniels,Elke Boone,Pieter-Jan Volders,Katrien De Mulder,Ellen Geerdens,Severine Berden,Jense Wils,Pauline Herroelen,Henk Louagie,Brigitte Maes","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nCell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening exhibits higher sensitivity and lower false-positive rates (FPRs) compared to combined first-trimester screening for common trisomies. However, additional anomalies on other autosomes detected by genome-wide assays cause anxiety and trigger increased rates of amniocentesis. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic value of software-generated digital estimates of trophoblastic mosaicism to identify false-positive screenings and inform posttest counseling.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 32 175 pregnancies were screened using a commercial genome-wide cffDNA screening assay alongside an open-source bioinformatics pipeline for fetal fraction and aneuploidy analysis. Amniocentesis outcomes were utilized to calculate positive predictive values (PPV) for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA), rare autosomal trisomies (RAT), and subchromosomal alterations (SA). Receiver operating characteristics and regression analysis were performed to identify read count metrics that minimize FPRs.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe assay showed 100% sensitivity for detecting trisomies 21, 18, and 13, with PPV ranging from 17% (+13) to 75% (+21). For SCA, PPV varied from 50% (45, X) to 89% (47, XXY). PPV for SA was 37%. RAT were detected in 0.33% of cases with a PPV of 6.6%. A proprietary digital estimate of trophoblastic mosaicism (mosaic ratio) exhibited good diagnostic performance (area under the curve 0.83-0.95) for false positives: mosaic ratio below 0.50, observed in 64% of RATs, 24% of SAs, 17% of common trisomies, and 7% of 45,X cases, was never associated with fetal aneuploidy.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nDigital estimates of trophoblastic mosaicism hold clinical significance for informing posttest counseling. Implementing these recommendations could reduce invasive testing for RAT from 0.33% to 0.11%.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Value of Digital Estimates of Trophoblastic Mosaicism in Genome-Wide Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening.\",\"authors\":\"Geert A Martens,Dieter De Smet,Guy Froyen,Koen Swaerts,Annick Daniels,Elke Boone,Pieter-Jan Volders,Katrien De Mulder,Ellen Geerdens,Severine Berden,Jense Wils,Pauline Herroelen,Henk Louagie,Brigitte Maes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nCell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening exhibits higher sensitivity and lower false-positive rates (FPRs) compared to combined first-trimester screening for common trisomies. However, additional anomalies on other autosomes detected by genome-wide assays cause anxiety and trigger increased rates of amniocentesis. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic value of software-generated digital estimates of trophoblastic mosaicism to identify false-positive screenings and inform posttest counseling.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA total of 32 175 pregnancies were screened using a commercial genome-wide cffDNA screening assay alongside an open-source bioinformatics pipeline for fetal fraction and aneuploidy analysis. Amniocentesis outcomes were utilized to calculate positive predictive values (PPV) for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA), rare autosomal trisomies (RAT), and subchromosomal alterations (SA). Receiver operating characteristics and regression analysis were performed to identify read count metrics that minimize FPRs.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe assay showed 100% sensitivity for detecting trisomies 21, 18, and 13, with PPV ranging from 17% (+13) to 75% (+21). For SCA, PPV varied from 50% (45, X) to 89% (47, XXY). PPV for SA was 37%. RAT were detected in 0.33% of cases with a PPV of 6.6%. A proprietary digital estimate of trophoblastic mosaicism (mosaic ratio) exhibited good diagnostic performance (area under the curve 0.83-0.95) for false positives: mosaic ratio below 0.50, observed in 64% of RATs, 24% of SAs, 17% of common trisomies, and 7% of 45,X cases, was never associated with fetal aneuploidy.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nDigital estimates of trophoblastic mosaicism hold clinical significance for informing posttest counseling. Implementing these recommendations could reduce invasive testing for RAT from 0.33% to 0.11%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf081\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景无细胞胎儿DNA (cffDNA)筛查显示出更高的敏感性和更低的假阳性率(fpr)相比,联合早期筛查常见三体。然而,通过全基因组测定检测到的其他常染色体上的额外异常会引起焦虑并引发羊膜穿刺术的发生率增加。在这里,我们评估了软件生成的滋养层嵌合的数字估计的诊断价值,以识别假阳性筛查并告知测试后咨询。方法采用商业全基因组cffDNA筛选方法对32 175例妊娠进行筛查,同时采用开源生物信息学管道进行胎儿部分和非整倍体分析。羊膜穿刺术结果用于计算常见三体、性染色体非整倍体、罕见常染色体三体和亚染色体改变的阳性预测值(PPV)。通过对接收器工作特性和回归分析,确定读取计数指标,使fpr最小化。结果该方法检测21、18、13三体的灵敏度为100%,PPV范围为17%(+13)~ 75%(+21)。对于SCA, PPV从50% (45,X)到89% (47,X)不等。SA的PPV为37%。0.33%的病例检出RAT, PPV为6.6%。一项专有的滋养层镶嵌(镶嵌比)数字估计对假阳性具有良好的诊断性能(曲线下面积0.83-0.95):镶嵌比低于0.50,在64%的rat, 24%的SAs, 17%的常见三体和7%的45,X病例中观察到,从未与胎儿非整倍体相关。结论滋养细胞嵌合的数字评估对提示检测后咨询具有临床意义。实施这些建议可以将RAT的侵入性检测从0.33%降低到0.11%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Value of Digital Estimates of Trophoblastic Mosaicism in Genome-Wide Cell-Free Fetal DNA Screening.
BACKGROUND Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening exhibits higher sensitivity and lower false-positive rates (FPRs) compared to combined first-trimester screening for common trisomies. However, additional anomalies on other autosomes detected by genome-wide assays cause anxiety and trigger increased rates of amniocentesis. Here, we evaluated the diagnostic value of software-generated digital estimates of trophoblastic mosaicism to identify false-positive screenings and inform posttest counseling. METHODS A total of 32 175 pregnancies were screened using a commercial genome-wide cffDNA screening assay alongside an open-source bioinformatics pipeline for fetal fraction and aneuploidy analysis. Amniocentesis outcomes were utilized to calculate positive predictive values (PPV) for common trisomies, sex chromosomal aneuploidy (SCA), rare autosomal trisomies (RAT), and subchromosomal alterations (SA). Receiver operating characteristics and regression analysis were performed to identify read count metrics that minimize FPRs. RESULTS The assay showed 100% sensitivity for detecting trisomies 21, 18, and 13, with PPV ranging from 17% (+13) to 75% (+21). For SCA, PPV varied from 50% (45, X) to 89% (47, XXY). PPV for SA was 37%. RAT were detected in 0.33% of cases with a PPV of 6.6%. A proprietary digital estimate of trophoblastic mosaicism (mosaic ratio) exhibited good diagnostic performance (area under the curve 0.83-0.95) for false positives: mosaic ratio below 0.50, observed in 64% of RATs, 24% of SAs, 17% of common trisomies, and 7% of 45,X cases, was never associated with fetal aneuploidy. CONCLUSIONS Digital estimates of trophoblastic mosaicism hold clinical significance for informing posttest counseling. Implementing these recommendations could reduce invasive testing for RAT from 0.33% to 0.11%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信