{"title":"皮肤科医师与深度学习模型诊断儿童白癜风的比较研究。","authors":"Shijuan Yu , Zhilin Chen , Jingyi He , Hua Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the performance of a deep learning (DL) model based on dermoscopy images in diagnosing childhood vitiligo.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 474 pediatric patients (223 with vitiligo and 251 without vitiligo) were enrolled. Three types of imaging data were collected: dermoscopic images, Wood’s lamp images, and standard clinical photographs. Two diagnostic evaluation approaches were established. Clinician-based assessment: Eight dermatologists performed a double-blind evaluation using dermoscopic images. DL-based assessment: ResNet152 and DenseNet121 models were trained on 3896 dermoscopic images (with an 8:2 split between the development set and validation set). The evaluation metrics included the AUC of ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and accuracy. Additionally, the correlation between clinicians’ diagnostic performance and their years of experience was analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ROC curve analysis revealed that using the training questionnaire as a control group, the diagnostic performance of dermatologists for vitiligo based solely on dermoscopy images yielded an AUC of 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.51–1.00), sensitivity of 0.88 (95 % CI: 0.53–0.99), and specificity of 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.41–0.96). The confusion matrix for the ResNet152 model indicated an accuracy of 83.08 %, a recall rate of 86.84 %, a precision of 81.08 %, a specificity of 79.22 %, an F1 score of 0.8386, and an AUC of 0.91. The confusion matrix for the DenseNet121 model indicated an accuracy of 81.41 % and a recall rate of 83.41 % (precision: 82.03 %, specificity: 79.12 %, F1 score: 0.8271, and AUC: 0.89).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both DL models based on dermoscopy images exhibit high overall classification performance in the diagnosis of childhood vitiligo.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20141,"journal":{"name":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 104727"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of dermatologists and deep learning model on diagnosing childhood vitiligo\",\"authors\":\"Shijuan Yu , Zhilin Chen , Jingyi He , Hua Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.104727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the performance of a deep learning (DL) model based on dermoscopy images in diagnosing childhood vitiligo.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 474 pediatric patients (223 with vitiligo and 251 without vitiligo) were enrolled. Three types of imaging data were collected: dermoscopic images, Wood’s lamp images, and standard clinical photographs. Two diagnostic evaluation approaches were established. Clinician-based assessment: Eight dermatologists performed a double-blind evaluation using dermoscopic images. DL-based assessment: ResNet152 and DenseNet121 models were trained on 3896 dermoscopic images (with an 8:2 split between the development set and validation set). The evaluation metrics included the AUC of ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and accuracy. Additionally, the correlation between clinicians’ diagnostic performance and their years of experience was analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ROC curve analysis revealed that using the training questionnaire as a control group, the diagnostic performance of dermatologists for vitiligo based solely on dermoscopy images yielded an AUC of 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.51–1.00), sensitivity of 0.88 (95 % CI: 0.53–0.99), and specificity of 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.41–0.96). The confusion matrix for the ResNet152 model indicated an accuracy of 83.08 %, a recall rate of 86.84 %, a precision of 81.08 %, a specificity of 79.22 %, an F1 score of 0.8386, and an AUC of 0.91. The confusion matrix for the DenseNet121 model indicated an accuracy of 81.41 % and a recall rate of 83.41 % (precision: 82.03 %, specificity: 79.12 %, F1 score: 0.8271, and AUC: 0.89).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both DL models based on dermoscopy images exhibit high overall classification performance in the diagnosis of childhood vitiligo.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy\",\"volume\":\"54 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104727\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100025002595\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100025002595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative study of dermatologists and deep learning model on diagnosing childhood vitiligo
Objective
To explore the performance of a deep learning (DL) model based on dermoscopy images in diagnosing childhood vitiligo.
Methods
A total of 474 pediatric patients (223 with vitiligo and 251 without vitiligo) were enrolled. Three types of imaging data were collected: dermoscopic images, Wood’s lamp images, and standard clinical photographs. Two diagnostic evaluation approaches were established. Clinician-based assessment: Eight dermatologists performed a double-blind evaluation using dermoscopic images. DL-based assessment: ResNet152 and DenseNet121 models were trained on 3896 dermoscopic images (with an 8:2 split between the development set and validation set). The evaluation metrics included the AUC of ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and accuracy. Additionally, the correlation between clinicians’ diagnostic performance and their years of experience was analyzed.
Results
ROC curve analysis revealed that using the training questionnaire as a control group, the diagnostic performance of dermatologists for vitiligo based solely on dermoscopy images yielded an AUC of 0.77 (95 % CI: 0.51–1.00), sensitivity of 0.88 (95 % CI: 0.53–0.99), and specificity of 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.41–0.96). The confusion matrix for the ResNet152 model indicated an accuracy of 83.08 %, a recall rate of 86.84 %, a precision of 81.08 %, a specificity of 79.22 %, an F1 score of 0.8386, and an AUC of 0.91. The confusion matrix for the DenseNet121 model indicated an accuracy of 81.41 % and a recall rate of 83.41 % (precision: 82.03 %, specificity: 79.12 %, F1 score: 0.8271, and AUC: 0.89).
Conclusion
Both DL models based on dermoscopy images exhibit high overall classification performance in the diagnosis of childhood vitiligo.
期刊介绍:
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy is an international journal for the dissemination of scientific knowledge and clinical developments of Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy in all medical specialties. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, case presentations, "how-to-do-it" articles, Letters to the Editor, short communications and relevant images with short descriptions. All submitted material is subject to a strict peer-review process.