马德里社区三级转诊医院紧急癫痫发作的当前管理,一项描述性研究。

P Mayo Rodríguez, M Romeral Jiménez, B Parejo Carbonell, C Lastras Fernández-Escandón, R Sánchez-Del-Hoyo, I García Morales
{"title":"马德里社区三级转诊医院紧急癫痫发作的当前管理,一项描述性研究。","authors":"P Mayo Rodríguez, M Romeral Jiménez, B Parejo Carbonell, C Lastras Fernández-Escandón, R Sánchez-Del-Hoyo, I García Morales","doi":"10.1016/j.nrleng.2025.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyse the current status of the management of urgent epileptic seizures (ES) in a tertiary referral hospital in the Community of Madrid at each stage of the care process and by the different medical teams involved, including out-of-hospital emergency services, hospital emergency departments and neurology teams.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional descriptive study with a subsequent 30-day prospective longitudinal follow-up of a consecutive sample of patients with urgent EC, recruited between October 2021 and March 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>53 patients were included. The mean age was 57.6 (21.2) years. 39.6% were women. 35.8% had a previous diagnosis of epilepsy. The most frequent cause of urgent ES was high-risk seizures (57%), followed by status epilepticus (24%) and cluster seizures (19%). A total of 90.5% of the seizures occurred in the out-of-hospital setting. The median time between ES and emergency services assessment was 40 (27-78) minutes, and between ES and neurology assessment 165 (97.5-290) minutes. 86.8% were treated with benzodiazepines and 81.1% with at least one anti-crisis medication. Urgent video-EEG monitoring was performed in 60.4%. The most frequent destination after emergency management was hospital discharge (47.2%), followed by hospitalisation (39.6%). At 30 days, 20.8% of patients had a new ES and 5.7% had died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of the current state of emergency EC management shows significant delays at all levels, both in assessment and drug administration.</p>","PeriodicalId":94155,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current management of urgent epileptic seizures in a tertiary referral hospital in the Community of Madrid: a descriptive study.\",\"authors\":\"P Mayo Rodríguez, M Romeral Jiménez, B Parejo Carbonell, C Lastras Fernández-Escandón, R Sánchez-Del-Hoyo, I García Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nrleng.2025.07.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Analyse the current status of the management of urgent epileptic seizures (ES) in a tertiary referral hospital in the Community of Madrid at each stage of the care process and by the different medical teams involved, including out-of-hospital emergency services, hospital emergency departments and neurology teams.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Cross-sectional descriptive study with a subsequent 30-day prospective longitudinal follow-up of a consecutive sample of patients with urgent EC, recruited between October 2021 and March 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>53 patients were included. The mean age was 57.6 (21.2) years. 39.6% were women. 35.8% had a previous diagnosis of epilepsy. The most frequent cause of urgent ES was high-risk seizures (57%), followed by status epilepticus (24%) and cluster seizures (19%). A total of 90.5% of the seizures occurred in the out-of-hospital setting. The median time between ES and emergency services assessment was 40 (27-78) minutes, and between ES and neurology assessment 165 (97.5-290) minutes. 86.8% were treated with benzodiazepines and 81.1% with at least one anti-crisis medication. Urgent video-EEG monitoring was performed in 60.4%. The most frequent destination after emergency management was hospital discharge (47.2%), followed by hospitalisation (39.6%). At 30 days, 20.8% of patients had a new ES and 5.7% had died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of the current state of emergency EC management shows significant delays at all levels, both in assessment and drug administration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2025.07.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrleng.2025.07.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析马德里社区一家三级转诊医院急诊癫痫发作(ES)在护理过程各个阶段的管理现状,并由不同的医疗团队参与,包括院外急诊服务、医院急诊科和神经内科团队。方法:横断面描述性研究,随后对2021年10月至2022年3月期间招募的紧急EC患者连续样本进行30天的前瞻性纵向随访。结果:纳入53例患者。平均年龄为57.6(21.2)岁。39.6%为女性。35.8%有癫痫病史。紧急ES最常见的原因是高危癫痫发作(57%),其次是癫痫持续状态(24%)和丛集性癫痫发作(19%)。总共90.5%的癫痫发作发生在院外。ES与急诊服务评估之间的中位时间为40(27-78)分钟,ES与神经学评估之间的中位时间为165(97.5-290)分钟。86.8%接受苯二氮卓类药物治疗,81.1%至少接受一种抗危机药物治疗。60.4%的患者进行了紧急视频脑电图监测。急诊处理后最常见的目的地是出院(47.2%),其次是住院(39.6%)。30天时,20.8%的患者发生了新的ES, 5.7%的患者死亡。结论:对紧急EC管理现状的分析表明,在评估和药物管理方面,各级都存在明显的延误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current management of urgent epileptic seizures in a tertiary referral hospital in the Community of Madrid: a descriptive study.

Objective: Analyse the current status of the management of urgent epileptic seizures (ES) in a tertiary referral hospital in the Community of Madrid at each stage of the care process and by the different medical teams involved, including out-of-hospital emergency services, hospital emergency departments and neurology teams.

Method: Cross-sectional descriptive study with a subsequent 30-day prospective longitudinal follow-up of a consecutive sample of patients with urgent EC, recruited between October 2021 and March 2022.

Results: 53 patients were included. The mean age was 57.6 (21.2) years. 39.6% were women. 35.8% had a previous diagnosis of epilepsy. The most frequent cause of urgent ES was high-risk seizures (57%), followed by status epilepticus (24%) and cluster seizures (19%). A total of 90.5% of the seizures occurred in the out-of-hospital setting. The median time between ES and emergency services assessment was 40 (27-78) minutes, and between ES and neurology assessment 165 (97.5-290) minutes. 86.8% were treated with benzodiazepines and 81.1% with at least one anti-crisis medication. Urgent video-EEG monitoring was performed in 60.4%. The most frequent destination after emergency management was hospital discharge (47.2%), followed by hospitalisation (39.6%). At 30 days, 20.8% of patients had a new ES and 5.7% had died.

Conclusions: Analysis of the current state of emergency EC management shows significant delays at all levels, both in assessment and drug administration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信