使用机器学习和预测人工智能来确定单独通风笼中小鼠的换笼频率,并提高笼内运行效率。

Joseph M Collins, Bhupinder Singh, Michael E Zwick, Giorgio Rosati, Mara Rigamonti, Cristian Urdiales, Jeetendra R Eswaraka
{"title":"使用机器学习和预测人工智能来确定单独通风笼中小鼠的换笼频率,并提高笼内运行效率。","authors":"Joseph M Collins, Bhupinder Singh, Michael E Zwick, Giorgio Rosati, Mara Rigamonti, Cristian Urdiales, Jeetendra R Eswaraka","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A standard 2-wk cage change frequency for individually ventilated mouse cages is used in many research facilities, with negligible effects on animal health and welfare. However, these techniques rely on subjective visual evaluations and often require spot changes. In this study, we describe the use and validation of digital monitoring technology to objectively determine the necessity of a cage change for mice. We used a machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm that was trained by annotating human observations of soiled bedding to correlate with the Bedding Status Index (BSI), a digital measure quantifying bedding 'wetness.' Training of the algorithm was performed using various mouse strains of different age, sex, and cage densities to account for variability of these factors. Through constant user feedback and increased datasets, we were able to identify soiled cages with an accuracy >90% for cages with higher densities (for example, 5 animals per cage), while lower densities exhibited slightly reduced accuracy levels (the lowest accuracy was attributed to single-housed mice, at 76%). Our data show that the average change intervals for most average-sized mice ranged between 3 and 6 wk depending on the number of animals in the cage, which is significantly different from the standard 2-wk change used in our facility. Retired breeders and larger mice tended to have a shorter cage change interval as determined by the algorithm. These results show that the Bedding Status Index, which measures an intracage environmental variable, namely bedding wetness, can be used as a marker for cage change. The extended cage change schedule did not affect intracage ammonia, CO2 levels, mouse growth rates, or circadian rhythm metrics. Using digital alerts to determine the need for a cage change resulted in a 65% to 70% reduction in the number of cage changes needed, indicating that this method can improve operational efficiency by reducing cage changes, cage wash time, staff labor, and resource consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Machine Learning and Predictive Artificial Intelligence to Determine Cage Change Frequency for Mice Housed in Individually Ventilated Cages and Drive Vivarium Operational Efficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph M Collins, Bhupinder Singh, Michael E Zwick, Giorgio Rosati, Mara Rigamonti, Cristian Urdiales, Jeetendra R Eswaraka\",\"doi\":\"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A standard 2-wk cage change frequency for individually ventilated mouse cages is used in many research facilities, with negligible effects on animal health and welfare. However, these techniques rely on subjective visual evaluations and often require spot changes. In this study, we describe the use and validation of digital monitoring technology to objectively determine the necessity of a cage change for mice. We used a machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm that was trained by annotating human observations of soiled bedding to correlate with the Bedding Status Index (BSI), a digital measure quantifying bedding 'wetness.' Training of the algorithm was performed using various mouse strains of different age, sex, and cage densities to account for variability of these factors. Through constant user feedback and increased datasets, we were able to identify soiled cages with an accuracy >90% for cages with higher densities (for example, 5 animals per cage), while lower densities exhibited slightly reduced accuracy levels (the lowest accuracy was attributed to single-housed mice, at 76%). Our data show that the average change intervals for most average-sized mice ranged between 3 and 6 wk depending on the number of animals in the cage, which is significantly different from the standard 2-wk change used in our facility. Retired breeders and larger mice tended to have a shorter cage change interval as determined by the algorithm. These results show that the Bedding Status Index, which measures an intracage environmental variable, namely bedding wetness, can be used as a marker for cage change. The extended cage change schedule did not affect intracage ammonia, CO2 levels, mouse growth rates, or circadian rhythm metrics. Using digital alerts to determine the need for a cage change resulted in a 65% to 70% reduction in the number of cage changes needed, indicating that this method can improve operational efficiency by reducing cage changes, cage wash time, staff labor, and resource consumption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379621/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多研究设施中,单独通风的小鼠笼采用标准的两周换笼频率,对动物健康和福利的影响可以忽略不计。然而,这些技术依赖于主观的视觉评估,经常需要现场改变。在本研究中,我们描述了数字监测技术的使用和验证,以客观地确定小鼠换笼的必要性。我们使用了一种机器学习/人工智能算法,该算法通过注释人类对被污染的床层的观察来与床层状态指数(BSI)相关联,BSI是一种量化床层“湿度”的数字测量。算法的训练是用不同年龄、性别和笼子密度的各种小鼠品系进行的,以解释这些因素的可变性。通过不断的用户反馈和增加的数据集,我们能够在密度较高的笼子(例如,每个笼子5只动物)中以bbb90 %的准确率识别脏笼子,而密度较低的笼子则显示出略微降低的准确性水平(最低的准确率归因于单笼老鼠,为76%)。我们的数据显示,根据笼子中动物的数量,大多数中等大小的老鼠的平均更换间隔在3到6周之间,这与我们设施中使用的标准2周更换明显不同。由算法确定的退休育种者和较大的小鼠往往具有较短的换笼间隔。这些结果表明,床层状态指数可以作为笼内环境变量,即床层湿度,作为笼内变化的标志。延长换笼时间不会影响笼内氨、二氧化碳水平、小鼠生长速率或昼夜节律指标。使用数字警报来确定更换笼子的需要,可以将更换笼子的次数减少65%到70%,这表明该方法可以通过减少更换笼子、笼子清洗时间、员工劳动和资源消耗来提高运营效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Machine Learning and Predictive Artificial Intelligence to Determine Cage Change Frequency for Mice Housed in Individually Ventilated Cages and Drive Vivarium Operational Efficiency.

A standard 2-wk cage change frequency for individually ventilated mouse cages is used in many research facilities, with negligible effects on animal health and welfare. However, these techniques rely on subjective visual evaluations and often require spot changes. In this study, we describe the use and validation of digital monitoring technology to objectively determine the necessity of a cage change for mice. We used a machine learning/artificial intelligence algorithm that was trained by annotating human observations of soiled bedding to correlate with the Bedding Status Index (BSI), a digital measure quantifying bedding 'wetness.' Training of the algorithm was performed using various mouse strains of different age, sex, and cage densities to account for variability of these factors. Through constant user feedback and increased datasets, we were able to identify soiled cages with an accuracy >90% for cages with higher densities (for example, 5 animals per cage), while lower densities exhibited slightly reduced accuracy levels (the lowest accuracy was attributed to single-housed mice, at 76%). Our data show that the average change intervals for most average-sized mice ranged between 3 and 6 wk depending on the number of animals in the cage, which is significantly different from the standard 2-wk change used in our facility. Retired breeders and larger mice tended to have a shorter cage change interval as determined by the algorithm. These results show that the Bedding Status Index, which measures an intracage environmental variable, namely bedding wetness, can be used as a marker for cage change. The extended cage change schedule did not affect intracage ammonia, CO2 levels, mouse growth rates, or circadian rhythm metrics. Using digital alerts to determine the need for a cage change resulted in a 65% to 70% reduction in the number of cage changes needed, indicating that this method can improve operational efficiency by reducing cage changes, cage wash time, staff labor, and resource consumption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信