输水方式对实验小鼠肠道微生物组的影响。

Alexa Kravitz, Samira Lawton, Cindy A Buckmaster, Todd F Little, Douglas Lohse, F Claire Hankenson
{"title":"输水方式对实验小鼠肠道微生物组的影响。","authors":"Alexa Kravitz, Samira Lawton, Cindy A Buckmaster, Todd F Little, Douglas Lohse, F Claire Hankenson","doi":"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nuances related to the milieu of the gastrointestinal tract have led to investigations of environmental (or extrinsic) factors, like feed sources and fluid intake, and their influences on the gut microbiome in research animals. Water is typically provided to laboratory mice either by reusable water bottle (RWB), housing rack automatic water (RAW) delivery, or single-use disposable plastic pouch (DPP). In this study, the influence of differing water delivery methods on gut microbiome stability was evaluated in immunocompetent (n = 36 B6; 18 male [M]:18 female [F]) and immunocompromised (n = 36 NOG; 18 M:18 F) strains of mice. Mice were housed on a single IVC rack in sex-specific groups and provided with autoclaved caging and bedding, irradiated feed, and chlorinated, reverse-osmosis water provided by one of 3 delivery methods (8 cages per method). Access to the room was restricted to select personnel to conduct animal care and sample collection tasks. Fecal pellets (n = 2) were collected from each animal every other week, and water samples were collected weekly for analysis. Over the course of the study, bacteria were detected in 11% of the RWB samples (7 of 63) and 4% of the RAW samples (1 of 25). DPP samples were consistently free of bacterial contamination. Shotgun metagenomics and statistical analyses revealed overt shifts in gut microbiota in the majority of mice throughout the study (21 of 25 cages). Histologic examinations of organs from representative clinically normal study mice (n = 12) were unremarkable. With minimal exceptions, microbiome shifts were statistically significant across cage cohorts, despite attempts to control experimental variables. This study is the first to demonstrate that the water delivery method does not impart a significant influence on gut microbiota stability in research rodents and highlights the need to document water type, treatment, and delivery method as extrinsic factors in reporting animal studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Water Delivery Method on the Gut Microbiome in Laboratory Mice (Mus musculus).\",\"authors\":\"Alexa Kravitz, Samira Lawton, Cindy A Buckmaster, Todd F Little, Douglas Lohse, F Claire Hankenson\",\"doi\":\"10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Nuances related to the milieu of the gastrointestinal tract have led to investigations of environmental (or extrinsic) factors, like feed sources and fluid intake, and their influences on the gut microbiome in research animals. Water is typically provided to laboratory mice either by reusable water bottle (RWB), housing rack automatic water (RAW) delivery, or single-use disposable plastic pouch (DPP). In this study, the influence of differing water delivery methods on gut microbiome stability was evaluated in immunocompetent (n = 36 B6; 18 male [M]:18 female [F]) and immunocompromised (n = 36 NOG; 18 M:18 F) strains of mice. Mice were housed on a single IVC rack in sex-specific groups and provided with autoclaved caging and bedding, irradiated feed, and chlorinated, reverse-osmosis water provided by one of 3 delivery methods (8 cages per method). Access to the room was restricted to select personnel to conduct animal care and sample collection tasks. Fecal pellets (n = 2) were collected from each animal every other week, and water samples were collected weekly for analysis. Over the course of the study, bacteria were detected in 11% of the RWB samples (7 of 63) and 4% of the RAW samples (1 of 25). DPP samples were consistently free of bacterial contamination. Shotgun metagenomics and statistical analyses revealed overt shifts in gut microbiota in the majority of mice throughout the study (21 of 25 cages). Histologic examinations of organs from representative clinically normal study mice (n = 12) were unremarkable. With minimal exceptions, microbiome shifts were statistically significant across cage cohorts, despite attempts to control experimental variables. This study is the first to demonstrate that the water delivery method does not impart a significant influence on gut microbiota stability in research rodents and highlights the need to document water type, treatment, and delivery method as extrinsic factors in reporting animal studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379618/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-24-085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与胃肠道环境相关的细微差别导致了对环境(或外在)因素的研究,如饲料来源和液体摄入量,以及它们对研究动物肠道微生物群的影响。水通常通过可重复使用的水瓶(RWB)、住房架自动供水(RAW)或一次性塑料袋(DPP)提供给实验室小鼠。在这项研究中,我们评估了不同输水方式对免疫正常(n = 36 B6;18名男性[M]:18名女性[F])和免疫功能低下(n = 36 NOG;18 M:18 F)小鼠品系。按性别分组,将小鼠置于单独的IVC架上,并给予高压灭菌的笼子和垫料、辐照饲料和氯化反渗透水(每种方法8个笼子)。只有经过挑选的人员才能进入该房间进行动物护理和样本采集任务。每隔一周从每只动物身上收集粪丸(n = 2),每周收集水样进行分析。在整个研究过程中,在11%的RWB样品(63个中的7个)和4%的RAW样品(25个中的1个)中检测到细菌。DPP样品始终没有细菌污染。霰弹枪宏基因组学和统计分析显示,在整个研究过程中,大多数小鼠(25个笼子中的21个)的肠道微生物群发生了明显的变化。具有代表性的临床正常小鼠(n = 12)的器官组织学检查无显著差异。尽管试图控制实验变量,但除了极少数例外,微生物组的变化在笼子队列中具有统计学意义。本研究首次证明了水输送方式对研究啮齿动物的肠道微生物群稳定性没有显著影响,并强调了在动物研究报告中需要记录水的类型、处理和输送方式作为外部因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Water Delivery Method on the Gut Microbiome in Laboratory Mice (Mus musculus).

Nuances related to the milieu of the gastrointestinal tract have led to investigations of environmental (or extrinsic) factors, like feed sources and fluid intake, and their influences on the gut microbiome in research animals. Water is typically provided to laboratory mice either by reusable water bottle (RWB), housing rack automatic water (RAW) delivery, or single-use disposable plastic pouch (DPP). In this study, the influence of differing water delivery methods on gut microbiome stability was evaluated in immunocompetent (n = 36 B6; 18 male [M]:18 female [F]) and immunocompromised (n = 36 NOG; 18 M:18 F) strains of mice. Mice were housed on a single IVC rack in sex-specific groups and provided with autoclaved caging and bedding, irradiated feed, and chlorinated, reverse-osmosis water provided by one of 3 delivery methods (8 cages per method). Access to the room was restricted to select personnel to conduct animal care and sample collection tasks. Fecal pellets (n = 2) were collected from each animal every other week, and water samples were collected weekly for analysis. Over the course of the study, bacteria were detected in 11% of the RWB samples (7 of 63) and 4% of the RAW samples (1 of 25). DPP samples were consistently free of bacterial contamination. Shotgun metagenomics and statistical analyses revealed overt shifts in gut microbiota in the majority of mice throughout the study (21 of 25 cages). Histologic examinations of organs from representative clinically normal study mice (n = 12) were unremarkable. With minimal exceptions, microbiome shifts were statistically significant across cage cohorts, despite attempts to control experimental variables. This study is the first to demonstrate that the water delivery method does not impart a significant influence on gut microbiota stability in research rodents and highlights the need to document water type, treatment, and delivery method as extrinsic factors in reporting animal studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信