慢性胰腺炎疼痛的内镜治疗进展。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Anthony M Rainho, Owen C Battel, Vanessa M Shami
{"title":"慢性胰腺炎疼痛的内镜治疗进展。","authors":"Anthony M Rainho, Owen C Battel, Vanessa M Shami","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000001120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This manuscript reviews recent updates on the management of pain in chronic pancreatitis, an entity that remains difficult to manage. In a time when opioid use disorder is on the rise, advanced endoscopists should be aware of the nonopioid options available to patients to help manage their pain.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Although there is no standardized approach in the management of pain in chronic pancreatitis, societal guidelines and recommendations have recently been updated to help guide physicians in this matter. However, the available endoscopic approaches have remained relatively unchanged in recent years. Studies are underway to determine whether one endoscopic approach is superior to another, depending on the suspected mechanism of pain.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Endoscopic management of pain in chronic pancreatitis remains challenging given the complex mechanisms at play. Surgery remains the most effective durable approach, though with significantly more morbidity and mortality compared to endoscopic options, which include endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), pancreatoscopy-directed lithotripsy, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block (EUS-CPB), depending on the predominant suspected cause of pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Updates in endoscopic management of pain in chronic pancreatitis.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony M Rainho, Owen C Battel, Vanessa M Shami\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOG.0000000000001120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This manuscript reviews recent updates on the management of pain in chronic pancreatitis, an entity that remains difficult to manage. In a time when opioid use disorder is on the rise, advanced endoscopists should be aware of the nonopioid options available to patients to help manage their pain.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Although there is no standardized approach in the management of pain in chronic pancreatitis, societal guidelines and recommendations have recently been updated to help guide physicians in this matter. However, the available endoscopic approaches have remained relatively unchanged in recent years. Studies are underway to determine whether one endoscopic approach is superior to another, depending on the suspected mechanism of pain.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Endoscopic management of pain in chronic pancreatitis remains challenging given the complex mechanisms at play. Surgery remains the most effective durable approach, though with significantly more morbidity and mortality compared to endoscopic options, which include endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), pancreatoscopy-directed lithotripsy, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block (EUS-CPB), depending on the predominant suspected cause of pain.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000001120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000001120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:这篇文章回顾了慢性胰腺炎疼痛治疗的最新进展,慢性胰腺炎仍然是一个难以治疗的疾病。在阿片类药物使用障碍呈上升趋势的时候,高级内窥镜医师应该意识到患者可以选择非阿片类药物来帮助他们控制疼痛。最近的研究发现:虽然在慢性胰腺炎疼痛的管理方面没有标准化的方法,但社会指南和建议最近已经更新,以帮助指导医生处理这一问题。然而,近年来可用的内镜入路保持相对不变。研究正在进行中,以确定一种内窥镜方法是否优于另一种,这取决于怀疑的疼痛机制。摘要:考虑到复杂的机制,慢性胰腺炎疼痛的内镜治疗仍然具有挑战性。手术仍然是最有效的持久方法,尽管与内窥镜选择相比,手术的发病率和死亡率要高得多,内窥镜选择包括内窥镜逆行胆管胰管造影(ERCP)、体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)、胰镜定向碎石术和内窥镜超声引导乳糜丛阻滞(EUS-CPB),这取决于主要怀疑的疼痛原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Updates in endoscopic management of pain in chronic pancreatitis.

Purpose of review: This manuscript reviews recent updates on the management of pain in chronic pancreatitis, an entity that remains difficult to manage. In a time when opioid use disorder is on the rise, advanced endoscopists should be aware of the nonopioid options available to patients to help manage their pain.

Recent findings: Although there is no standardized approach in the management of pain in chronic pancreatitis, societal guidelines and recommendations have recently been updated to help guide physicians in this matter. However, the available endoscopic approaches have remained relatively unchanged in recent years. Studies are underway to determine whether one endoscopic approach is superior to another, depending on the suspected mechanism of pain.

Summary: Endoscopic management of pain in chronic pancreatitis remains challenging given the complex mechanisms at play. Surgery remains the most effective durable approach, though with significantly more morbidity and mortality compared to endoscopic options, which include endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), pancreatoscopy-directed lithotripsy, and endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block (EUS-CPB), depending on the predominant suspected cause of pain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信