德国版反流症状指数的效度和信度。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Jiri Podzimek
{"title":"德国版反流症状指数的效度和信度。","authors":"Jiri Podzimek","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) is a widely used self-administered questionnaire for assessing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). This study aimed to develop a German version of the RSI (G-RSI) and to evaluate its reliability, clinical validity, and responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>prospective, controlled, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case-control study included 95 patients with LPR symptoms and 60 asymptomatic control subjects. The RSI was translated into German using a forward-backward methodology. Participants completed the G-RSI at baseline (G-RSI d0), and LPR patients completed it again after 14 days (G-RSI d14) and after a 12-week treatment period (G-RSI w12). Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Internal validity was evaluated by comparing the G-RSI scores of patients and controls. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the pretreatment and post treatment scores. The G-RSI cutoff for determining the presence or absence of LPR was examined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's α for the G-RSI was 0.924, indicating high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.92). The G-RSI demonstrated high internal validity, with significant differences between patient and control scores (P < 0.001). Responsiveness was also high, with significant improvements in G-RSI scores after treatment (P < 0.001). A G-RSI cut-off value of 13 was indicative of LPR, with high sensitivity (97.4%) and specificity (90.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The German RSI demonstrated high reproducibility, excellent clinical validity, and responsiveness after transcultural adaptation. It is a valuable tool for the initial symptom assessment and evaluation of therapeutic interventions in individuals with suspected acid LPR in outpatient clinics and primary healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of a German Version of Reflux Symptom Index.\",\"authors\":\"Jiri Podzimek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) is a widely used self-administered questionnaire for assessing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). This study aimed to develop a German version of the RSI (G-RSI) and to evaluate its reliability, clinical validity, and responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>prospective, controlled, cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case-control study included 95 patients with LPR symptoms and 60 asymptomatic control subjects. The RSI was translated into German using a forward-backward methodology. Participants completed the G-RSI at baseline (G-RSI d0), and LPR patients completed it again after 14 days (G-RSI d14) and after a 12-week treatment period (G-RSI w12). Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Internal validity was evaluated by comparing the G-RSI scores of patients and controls. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the pretreatment and post treatment scores. The G-RSI cutoff for determining the presence or absence of LPR was examined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's α for the G-RSI was 0.924, indicating high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.92). The G-RSI demonstrated high internal validity, with significant differences between patient and control scores (P < 0.001). Responsiveness was also high, with significant improvements in G-RSI scores after treatment (P < 0.001). A G-RSI cut-off value of 13 was indicative of LPR, with high sensitivity (97.4%) and specificity (90.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The German RSI demonstrated high reproducibility, excellent clinical validity, and responsiveness after transcultural adaptation. It is a valuable tool for the initial symptom assessment and evaluation of therapeutic interventions in individuals with suspected acid LPR in outpatient clinics and primary healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:反流症状指数(RSI)是一种广泛用于评估喉咽反流(LPR)的自填问卷。本研究旨在开发德国版本的RSI (G-RSI),并评估其可靠性、临床有效性和反应性。研究设计:前瞻性、对照、横断面研究。方法:本研究纳入95例有LPR症状的患者和60例无症状的对照组。RSI被翻译成德语,使用的是一种向前向后的方法。参与者在基线时完成G-RSI (G-RSI d0), LPR患者在14天后(G-RSI d14)和12周治疗期后(G-RSI w12)再次完成G-RSI。信度分析采用Cronbach’s alpha和类内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficients, ICC)。通过比较患者和对照组的G-RSI评分来评估内部效度。通过比较治疗前和治疗后的评分来评估反应性。G-RSI截止值用于确定LPR的存在或不存在,使用接收器工作特性分析进行检查。结果:G-RSI的Cronbach’s α为0.924,具有较高的内部一致性。重测信度极好(ICC = 0.92)。G-RSI表现出较高的内部效度,患者和对照组评分之间存在显著差异(P)。结论:德国RSI表现出高重复性、优异的临床效度和跨文化适应后的反应性。对于门诊和初级卫生保健机构中疑似酸性LPR患者的初步症状评估和治疗干预评估,这是一个有价值的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and Reliability of a German Version of Reflux Symptom Index.

Objective: The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) is a widely used self-administered questionnaire for assessing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). This study aimed to develop a German version of the RSI (G-RSI) and to evaluate its reliability, clinical validity, and responsiveness.

Study design: prospective, controlled, cross-sectional study.

Methods: This case-control study included 95 patients with LPR symptoms and 60 asymptomatic control subjects. The RSI was translated into German using a forward-backward methodology. Participants completed the G-RSI at baseline (G-RSI d0), and LPR patients completed it again after 14 days (G-RSI d14) and after a 12-week treatment period (G-RSI w12). Reliability was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Internal validity was evaluated by comparing the G-RSI scores of patients and controls. Responsiveness was assessed by comparing the pretreatment and post treatment scores. The G-RSI cutoff for determining the presence or absence of LPR was examined using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: The Cronbach's α for the G-RSI was 0.924, indicating high internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.92). The G-RSI demonstrated high internal validity, with significant differences between patient and control scores (P < 0.001). Responsiveness was also high, with significant improvements in G-RSI scores after treatment (P < 0.001). A G-RSI cut-off value of 13 was indicative of LPR, with high sensitivity (97.4%) and specificity (90.5%).

Conclusions: The German RSI demonstrated high reproducibility, excellent clinical validity, and responsiveness after transcultural adaptation. It is a valuable tool for the initial symptom assessment and evaluation of therapeutic interventions in individuals with suspected acid LPR in outpatient clinics and primary healthcare settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Voice
Journal of Voice 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
395
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信