Mara R Kapsner-Smith, Aideen Gill, Abigail Muzila, Tamara Polyakova, Austeja Rubeski, Joshua Kline, Cara E Stepp, Jenny Vojtech
{"title":"计算相对基频的基于python的图形用户界面的验证。","authors":"Mara R Kapsner-Smith, Aideen Gill, Abigail Muzila, Tamara Polyakova, Austeja Rubeski, Joshua Kline, Cara E Stepp, Jenny Vojtech","doi":"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to validate PyRFF, a semi-automated software for calculating relative fundamental frequency (RFF). PyRFF was developed in Python, a widely used open source programming language, making it freely accessible and broadly applicable for researchers and clinicians. By providing an accessible tool for RFF extraction, PyRFF has the potential to facilitate wider adoption of RFF measures in both research and clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Validation study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the accuracy of PyRFF, RFF measures were extracted using both PyRFF and a previously validated, semi-automated algorithm implemented in MATLAB. The outputs from the two programs were then compared using statistical measures of error, including root mean square error (RMSE) and mean bias error (MBE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated near-identical outputs between PyRFF and the MATLAB-based algorithm. RMSE and MBE values were close to zero for all comparisons, indicating minimal discrepancy between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PyRFF offers a valid, freely available software platform for extracting RFF measures, ensuring accessibility for a broad user base of researchers, clinicians, and students. The availability of free, user-friendly software is essential for advancing research and clinical application of RFF in voice assessment. By providing an alternative to MATLAB-based methods, PyRFF lowers financial and technical barriers, promoting further exploration of RFF as a potential tool in voice disorder assessment and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49954,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Voice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Python-Based Graphical User Interface for Calculation of Relative Fundamental Frequency.\",\"authors\":\"Mara R Kapsner-Smith, Aideen Gill, Abigail Muzila, Tamara Polyakova, Austeja Rubeski, Joshua Kline, Cara E Stepp, Jenny Vojtech\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to validate PyRFF, a semi-automated software for calculating relative fundamental frequency (RFF). PyRFF was developed in Python, a widely used open source programming language, making it freely accessible and broadly applicable for researchers and clinicians. By providing an accessible tool for RFF extraction, PyRFF has the potential to facilitate wider adoption of RFF measures in both research and clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Validation study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To assess the accuracy of PyRFF, RFF measures were extracted using both PyRFF and a previously validated, semi-automated algorithm implemented in MATLAB. The outputs from the two programs were then compared using statistical measures of error, including root mean square error (RMSE) and mean bias error (MBE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated near-identical outputs between PyRFF and the MATLAB-based algorithm. RMSE and MBE values were close to zero for all comparisons, indicating minimal discrepancy between the two methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PyRFF offers a valid, freely available software platform for extracting RFF measures, ensuring accessibility for a broad user base of researchers, clinicians, and students. The availability of free, user-friendly software is essential for advancing research and clinical application of RFF in voice assessment. By providing an alternative to MATLAB-based methods, PyRFF lowers financial and technical barriers, promoting further exploration of RFF as a potential tool in voice disorder assessment and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Voice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Voice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2025.06.031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of a Python-Based Graphical User Interface for Calculation of Relative Fundamental Frequency.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to validate PyRFF, a semi-automated software for calculating relative fundamental frequency (RFF). PyRFF was developed in Python, a widely used open source programming language, making it freely accessible and broadly applicable for researchers and clinicians. By providing an accessible tool for RFF extraction, PyRFF has the potential to facilitate wider adoption of RFF measures in both research and clinical settings.
Study design: Validation study.
Methods: To assess the accuracy of PyRFF, RFF measures were extracted using both PyRFF and a previously validated, semi-automated algorithm implemented in MATLAB. The outputs from the two programs were then compared using statistical measures of error, including root mean square error (RMSE) and mean bias error (MBE).
Results: The results demonstrated near-identical outputs between PyRFF and the MATLAB-based algorithm. RMSE and MBE values were close to zero for all comparisons, indicating minimal discrepancy between the two methods.
Conclusions: PyRFF offers a valid, freely available software platform for extracting RFF measures, ensuring accessibility for a broad user base of researchers, clinicians, and students. The availability of free, user-friendly software is essential for advancing research and clinical application of RFF in voice assessment. By providing an alternative to MATLAB-based methods, PyRFF lowers financial and technical barriers, promoting further exploration of RFF as a potential tool in voice disorder assessment and treatment.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Voice is widely regarded as the world''s premiere journal for voice medicine and research. This peer-reviewed publication is listed in Index Medicus and is indexed by the Institute for Scientific Information. The journal contains articles written by experts throughout the world on all topics in voice sciences, voice medicine and surgery, and speech-language pathologists'' management of voice-related problems. The journal includes clinical articles, clinical research, and laboratory research. Members of the Foundation receive the journal as a benefit of membership.