门诊经皮肾镜取石术,一个有趣的选择:系统回顾。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ali Bourgi, Elias Ayoub, Franck Bruyere
{"title":"门诊经皮肾镜取石术,一个有趣的选择:系统回顾。","authors":"Ali Bourgi, Elias Ayoub, Franck Bruyere","doi":"10.22037/uj.v22i.8331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The prevalence of kidney stone disease and associated events is rising, with modern surgical approaches emphasizing minimally invasive techniques like ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This strategy offers potential benefits such as reduced costs, improved efficiency, and high patient satisfaction. However, its safety and feasibility require further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on ambulatory PCNL published between 1986 and 2024. Out of 2381 identified studies in the initial pool, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed regarding patient selection, technical modifications, surgical outcomes, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 456 patients undergoing 459 procedures. Ambulatory PCNL was feasible for highly selected patients meeting strict criteria (ASA <3, BMI <35 kg/m², no major comorbidities, and minimal stone burden). Mean operative time was 103 minutes, with an average hospital stay of 6.4 hours. The procedure achieved a 93% stone clearance rate, with 15% experiencing mild complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2) and 4.6% readmissions. Severe complications (grade 3-4) were rare (0.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ambulatory PCNL is a safe, efficient option for select patients, optimizing healthcare resources and improving patient outcomes. Wider adoption requires standardized protocols and multicenter studies to expand its application.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"116-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outpatient Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, An Interesting Option: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ali Bourgi, Elias Ayoub, Franck Bruyere\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/uj.v22i.8331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The prevalence of kidney stone disease and associated events is rising, with modern surgical approaches emphasizing minimally invasive techniques like ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This strategy offers potential benefits such as reduced costs, improved efficiency, and high patient satisfaction. However, its safety and feasibility require further evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on ambulatory PCNL published between 1986 and 2024. Out of 2381 identified studies in the initial pool, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed regarding patient selection, technical modifications, surgical outcomes, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review included 456 patients undergoing 459 procedures. Ambulatory PCNL was feasible for highly selected patients meeting strict criteria (ASA <3, BMI <35 kg/m², no major comorbidities, and minimal stone burden). Mean operative time was 103 minutes, with an average hospital stay of 6.4 hours. The procedure achieved a 93% stone clearance rate, with 15% experiencing mild complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2) and 4.6% readmissions. Severe complications (grade 3-4) were rare (0.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ambulatory PCNL is a safe, efficient option for select patients, optimizing healthcare resources and improving patient outcomes. Wider adoption requires standardized protocols and multicenter studies to expand its application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"116-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v22i.8331\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v22i.8331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肾结石疾病及其相关事件的患病率正在上升,现代手术方法强调微创技术,如门诊经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)。这种策略提供了诸如降低成本、提高效率和提高患者满意度等潜在好处。但其安全性和可行性有待进一步评价。方法:按照PRISMA指南进行系统评价。检索了PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆等数据库,检索了1986年至2024年间发表的关于门诊PCNL的研究。在最初确定的2381项研究中,有17项符合纳入标准。我们分析了患者选择、技术改进、手术结果和并发症方面的数据。结果:纳入456例患者,共进行459次手术。结论:门诊PCNL是一种安全、有效的选择,可优化医疗资源,改善患者预后。更广泛的采用需要标准化协议和多中心研究来扩大其应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outpatient Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, An Interesting Option: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: The prevalence of kidney stone disease and associated events is rising, with modern surgical approaches emphasizing minimally invasive techniques like ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This strategy offers potential benefits such as reduced costs, improved efficiency, and high patient satisfaction. However, its safety and feasibility require further evaluation.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies on ambulatory PCNL published between 1986 and 2024. Out of 2381 identified studies in the initial pool, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed regarding patient selection, technical modifications, surgical outcomes, and complications.

Results: The review included 456 patients undergoing 459 procedures. Ambulatory PCNL was feasible for highly selected patients meeting strict criteria (ASA <3, BMI <35 kg/m², no major comorbidities, and minimal stone burden). Mean operative time was 103 minutes, with an average hospital stay of 6.4 hours. The procedure achieved a 93% stone clearance rate, with 15% experiencing mild complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2) and 4.6% readmissions. Severe complications (grade 3-4) were rare (0.4%).

Conclusion: Ambulatory PCNL is a safe, efficient option for select patients, optimizing healthcare resources and improving patient outcomes. Wider adoption requires standardized protocols and multicenter studies to expand its application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信