伴有中度至重度呼吸困难相关功能损害的晚期肺癌患者的多维度呼吸困难特征:一项潜在特征分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stephen B Lo, Joosun Shin, Mia E Holtze, Kathryn E Post, Ijeoma Julie Eche-Ugwu, Jennifer S Temel, Mary E Cooley, Joseph A Greer
{"title":"伴有中度至重度呼吸困难相关功能损害的晚期肺癌患者的多维度呼吸困难特征:一项潜在特征分析。","authors":"Stephen B Lo, Joosun Shin, Mia E Holtze, Kathryn E Post, Ijeoma Julie Eche-Ugwu, Jennifer S Temel, Mary E Cooley, Joseph A Greer","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09757-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dyspnea impacts most patients with advanced lung cancer. However, research on dyspnea has been limited by using unidimensional self-report measures despite its multidimensional nature (sensory-perceptual experience, affective distress, and functional impact), which requires a comprehensive evaluation. To identify distinct patient profiles of dyspnea presentation and evaluate differences in demographic, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes (i.e., functional impairment, quality of life, co-occurring symptoms, and self-efficacy).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, secondary analysis of 247 patients with advanced lung cancer reporting moderate-to-severe dyspnea was conducted using baseline data from a randomized controlled trial testing a behavioral intervention for dyspnea. The patient profiles of dyspnea were identified using latent profile analysis of the Cancer Dyspnea Scale. Differences among the profiles were assessed through parametric and non-parametric methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four-class solutions were identified: All Mild (A-Mild: 53%), Moderate Effort and Discomfort & Mild Anxiety (Moderate ED & Mild A: 25.9%), All Moderate (A-Moderate: 16.6%), and All Severe (A-Severe: 4.5%) dyspnea profiles. No significant differences were found among demographic and clinical variables across the profiles. Compared to the A-Mild profile, the other three profiles reported more significant functional impairment due to dyspnea, increased levels of depression, anxiety, and fatigue, and reduced quality of life. The A-Severe profile exhibited lower self-efficacy than the Moderate ED & Mild A and the A-Moderate profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the multidimensional nature of dyspnea, which results in distinct patient presentations. Clinicians can create targeted interventions tailored to individual needs by classifying dyspnea symptom profiles.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 8","pages":"700"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of multidimensional dyspnea in advanced lung cancer with moderate to severe dyspnea-related functional impairment: a latent profile analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen B Lo, Joosun Shin, Mia E Holtze, Kathryn E Post, Ijeoma Julie Eche-Ugwu, Jennifer S Temel, Mary E Cooley, Joseph A Greer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09757-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dyspnea impacts most patients with advanced lung cancer. However, research on dyspnea has been limited by using unidimensional self-report measures despite its multidimensional nature (sensory-perceptual experience, affective distress, and functional impact), which requires a comprehensive evaluation. To identify distinct patient profiles of dyspnea presentation and evaluate differences in demographic, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes (i.e., functional impairment, quality of life, co-occurring symptoms, and self-efficacy).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, secondary analysis of 247 patients with advanced lung cancer reporting moderate-to-severe dyspnea was conducted using baseline data from a randomized controlled trial testing a behavioral intervention for dyspnea. The patient profiles of dyspnea were identified using latent profile analysis of the Cancer Dyspnea Scale. Differences among the profiles were assessed through parametric and non-parametric methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four-class solutions were identified: All Mild (A-Mild: 53%), Moderate Effort and Discomfort & Mild Anxiety (Moderate ED & Mild A: 25.9%), All Moderate (A-Moderate: 16.6%), and All Severe (A-Severe: 4.5%) dyspnea profiles. No significant differences were found among demographic and clinical variables across the profiles. Compared to the A-Mild profile, the other three profiles reported more significant functional impairment due to dyspnea, increased levels of depression, anxiety, and fatigue, and reduced quality of life. The A-Severe profile exhibited lower self-efficacy than the Moderate ED & Mild A and the A-Moderate profiles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the multidimensional nature of dyspnea, which results in distinct patient presentations. Clinicians can create targeted interventions tailored to individual needs by classifying dyspnea symptom profiles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 8\",\"pages\":\"700\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09757-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09757-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:呼吸困难影响晚期肺癌患者。然而,尽管呼吸困难具有多维性(感觉-知觉体验、情感困扰和功能影响),但其研究仍受到单维自我报告测量的限制,需要全面评估。识别不同的呼吸困难患者表现,评估人口学、临床特征和患者报告的结果(即功能损害、生活质量、共存症状和自我效能)的差异。方法:对247例报告中度至重度呼吸困难的晚期肺癌患者进行横断面、二次分析,采用一项随机对照试验的基线数据,测试行为干预呼吸困难。使用癌症呼吸困难量表的潜在特征分析来确定呼吸困难的患者特征。通过参数和非参数方法评估各剖面之间的差异。结果:确定了四类解决方案:所有轻度(A-轻度:53%),中度努力和不适和轻度焦虑(中度ED和轻度A: 25.9%),所有中度(A-中度:16.6%)和所有严重(A-重度:4.5%)呼吸困难。在人口统计学和临床变量之间没有发现显著差异。与A-Mild相比,其他三种类型的患者报告了更严重的功能障碍,包括呼吸困难、抑郁、焦虑和疲劳程度的增加以及生活质量的降低。A-重度ED的自我效能感低于中度ED、轻度A和A-中度ED。结论:我们的研究结果强调了呼吸困难的多维性,这导致了不同的患者表现。临床医生可以通过对呼吸困难症状进行分类,根据个人需求制定针对性的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of multidimensional dyspnea in advanced lung cancer with moderate to severe dyspnea-related functional impairment: a latent profile analysis.

Purpose: Dyspnea impacts most patients with advanced lung cancer. However, research on dyspnea has been limited by using unidimensional self-report measures despite its multidimensional nature (sensory-perceptual experience, affective distress, and functional impact), which requires a comprehensive evaluation. To identify distinct patient profiles of dyspnea presentation and evaluate differences in demographic, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes (i.e., functional impairment, quality of life, co-occurring symptoms, and self-efficacy).

Methods: A cross-sectional, secondary analysis of 247 patients with advanced lung cancer reporting moderate-to-severe dyspnea was conducted using baseline data from a randomized controlled trial testing a behavioral intervention for dyspnea. The patient profiles of dyspnea were identified using latent profile analysis of the Cancer Dyspnea Scale. Differences among the profiles were assessed through parametric and non-parametric methods.

Results: Four-class solutions were identified: All Mild (A-Mild: 53%), Moderate Effort and Discomfort & Mild Anxiety (Moderate ED & Mild A: 25.9%), All Moderate (A-Moderate: 16.6%), and All Severe (A-Severe: 4.5%) dyspnea profiles. No significant differences were found among demographic and clinical variables across the profiles. Compared to the A-Mild profile, the other three profiles reported more significant functional impairment due to dyspnea, increased levels of depression, anxiety, and fatigue, and reduced quality of life. The A-Severe profile exhibited lower self-efficacy than the Moderate ED & Mild A and the A-Moderate profiles.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight the multidimensional nature of dyspnea, which results in distinct patient presentations. Clinicians can create targeted interventions tailored to individual needs by classifying dyspnea symptom profiles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信