Diogo Luís Marques, Waleed Abohasel, Shaea Alkahtani, Mohammed Alsaeed, Norah K Algarzae, Henrique Pereira Neiva, Daniel Almeida Marinho, Mário Cardoso Marques
{"title":"自由重量卧式和倾斜卧推中的载荷-速度关系。","authors":"Diogo Luís Marques, Waleed Abohasel, Shaea Alkahtani, Mohammed Alsaeed, Norah K Algarzae, Henrique Pereira Neiva, Daniel Almeida Marinho, Mário Cardoso Marques","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-12166-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study compared (i) the load-velocity relationship in the free-weight horizontal (HBP) vs. incline bench press (IBP) and (ii) the differences between general vs. individual load-velocity equations to estimate the one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the HBP and IBP. Thirty males (26 ± 3 years) performed four sessions: two dedicated to assessing the 1RM in the HBP and IBP, and another two to measure the mean propulsive velocity (MPV) reached against loads of 40-90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP. Individual load-velocity equations estimated the MPV from 30 to 100% 1RM in the HBP and IBP and the 1RM in each exercise. Furthermore, general equations estimated the 1RM in each exercise. The estimated MPV values associated with 30-100% 1RM in the HBP and IBP were compared. The coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) determined the reliability between the actual and estimated 1RM in both exercises. The results showed higher MPV in the HBP than in the IBP from 30 to 80% 1RM (p < 0.001). General and individual equations provided acceptable estimates of the 1RM when using loads from 70 to 90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP (CV < 10% and ICC > 0.80) but not 40-60% 1RM (CV > 10% and ICC < 0.80). This study shows that the load-velocity relationship differs between HBP and IBP, with higher velocities reached in HBP. Furthermore, individual and general equations seem reliable in estimating the 1RM when using relative loads from 70 to 90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"26203"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Load-velocity relationship in the free-weight horizontal and incline bench press.\",\"authors\":\"Diogo Luís Marques, Waleed Abohasel, Shaea Alkahtani, Mohammed Alsaeed, Norah K Algarzae, Henrique Pereira Neiva, Daniel Almeida Marinho, Mário Cardoso Marques\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-12166-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study compared (i) the load-velocity relationship in the free-weight horizontal (HBP) vs. incline bench press (IBP) and (ii) the differences between general vs. individual load-velocity equations to estimate the one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the HBP and IBP. Thirty males (26 ± 3 years) performed four sessions: two dedicated to assessing the 1RM in the HBP and IBP, and another two to measure the mean propulsive velocity (MPV) reached against loads of 40-90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP. Individual load-velocity equations estimated the MPV from 30 to 100% 1RM in the HBP and IBP and the 1RM in each exercise. Furthermore, general equations estimated the 1RM in each exercise. The estimated MPV values associated with 30-100% 1RM in the HBP and IBP were compared. The coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) determined the reliability between the actual and estimated 1RM in both exercises. The results showed higher MPV in the HBP than in the IBP from 30 to 80% 1RM (p < 0.001). General and individual equations provided acceptable estimates of the 1RM when using loads from 70 to 90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP (CV < 10% and ICC > 0.80) but not 40-60% 1RM (CV > 10% and ICC < 0.80). This study shows that the load-velocity relationship differs between HBP and IBP, with higher velocities reached in HBP. Furthermore, individual and general equations seem reliable in estimating the 1RM when using relative loads from 70 to 90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"26203\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12274453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12166-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12166-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Load-velocity relationship in the free-weight horizontal and incline bench press.
This study compared (i) the load-velocity relationship in the free-weight horizontal (HBP) vs. incline bench press (IBP) and (ii) the differences between general vs. individual load-velocity equations to estimate the one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the HBP and IBP. Thirty males (26 ± 3 years) performed four sessions: two dedicated to assessing the 1RM in the HBP and IBP, and another two to measure the mean propulsive velocity (MPV) reached against loads of 40-90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP. Individual load-velocity equations estimated the MPV from 30 to 100% 1RM in the HBP and IBP and the 1RM in each exercise. Furthermore, general equations estimated the 1RM in each exercise. The estimated MPV values associated with 30-100% 1RM in the HBP and IBP were compared. The coefficient of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) determined the reliability between the actual and estimated 1RM in both exercises. The results showed higher MPV in the HBP than in the IBP from 30 to 80% 1RM (p < 0.001). General and individual equations provided acceptable estimates of the 1RM when using loads from 70 to 90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP (CV < 10% and ICC > 0.80) but not 40-60% 1RM (CV > 10% and ICC < 0.80). This study shows that the load-velocity relationship differs between HBP and IBP, with higher velocities reached in HBP. Furthermore, individual and general equations seem reliable in estimating the 1RM when using relative loads from 70 to 90% 1RM in the HBP and IBP.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.