Xinlong Xu, Yue Qiang, Li Li, Siyu Liang, Tao Chen, Wenjun Yang, Xinyi Tan, Xi Wang, He Yang
{"title":"基于动态安全因子映射的MaxEnt-TRIGRS混合模型在降雨触发地形中增强泥石流易感性评估。","authors":"Xinlong Xu, Yue Qiang, Li Li, Siyu Liang, Tao Chen, Wenjun Yang, Xinyi Tan, Xi Wang, He Yang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-11284-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traditional statistical models for debris-flow susceptibility often overlook critical triggering mechanisms and geotechnical parameters. To address this, we propose an innovative framework that couples the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) statistical model with the TRIGRS physical model, which simulates transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope stability. Focusing on seven towns in Beichuan County, China, we integrated thirteen environmental factors, geotechnical parameters, and historical hazard records to build a dual-driven \"statistical-physical\" evaluation framework. Our methodology consists of three steps: (1) Use TRIGRS to compute rainfall-induced safety factors (FS) and identify unstable zones (FS < 1), which serve as the positive-sample database for MaxEnt; (2) Employ the MaxEnt model-using the TRIGRS-derived positive samples and historical debris-flow factors-to predict the spatial distribution of susceptibility; (3) Integrate both outputs spatially in GIS using dynamic weighting. Validation shows that the hybrid model improves prediction accuracy by 21% compared to MaxEnt alone (AUC = 0.845). Its susceptibility map corrects 34.7% of the overpredicted areas from the statistical model and enlarges stable zones by 1.8 times. Additionally, to determine the optimal weighting between machine learning and the physical model, we tested three weight combinations and found that a 0.55:0.45 ratio (MaxEnt: TRIGRS) yields the best performance. Using an independent validation set from another study area, we correctly identified 83.6% of the historical debris-flow events in Changtan, demonstrating the framework's ability to integrate geostatistical patterns with geomechanical processes. This coupled framework offers a paradigm for multi-hazard chain assessment in complex terrain and can be directly applied to debris-flow early warning and regional disaster mitigation planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"26209"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A MaxEnt-TRIGRS hybrid model with dynamic safety factor mapping for enhanced debris flow susceptibility assessment in rainfall-triggered terrains.\",\"authors\":\"Xinlong Xu, Yue Qiang, Li Li, Siyu Liang, Tao Chen, Wenjun Yang, Xinyi Tan, Xi Wang, He Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-11284-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traditional statistical models for debris-flow susceptibility often overlook critical triggering mechanisms and geotechnical parameters. To address this, we propose an innovative framework that couples the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) statistical model with the TRIGRS physical model, which simulates transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope stability. Focusing on seven towns in Beichuan County, China, we integrated thirteen environmental factors, geotechnical parameters, and historical hazard records to build a dual-driven \\\"statistical-physical\\\" evaluation framework. Our methodology consists of three steps: (1) Use TRIGRS to compute rainfall-induced safety factors (FS) and identify unstable zones (FS < 1), which serve as the positive-sample database for MaxEnt; (2) Employ the MaxEnt model-using the TRIGRS-derived positive samples and historical debris-flow factors-to predict the spatial distribution of susceptibility; (3) Integrate both outputs spatially in GIS using dynamic weighting. Validation shows that the hybrid model improves prediction accuracy by 21% compared to MaxEnt alone (AUC = 0.845). Its susceptibility map corrects 34.7% of the overpredicted areas from the statistical model and enlarges stable zones by 1.8 times. Additionally, to determine the optimal weighting between machine learning and the physical model, we tested three weight combinations and found that a 0.55:0.45 ratio (MaxEnt: TRIGRS) yields the best performance. Using an independent validation set from another study area, we correctly identified 83.6% of the historical debris-flow events in Changtan, demonstrating the framework's ability to integrate geostatistical patterns with geomechanical processes. This coupled framework offers a paradigm for multi-hazard chain assessment in complex terrain and can be directly applied to debris-flow early warning and regional disaster mitigation planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"26209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276292/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11284-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11284-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
A MaxEnt-TRIGRS hybrid model with dynamic safety factor mapping for enhanced debris flow susceptibility assessment in rainfall-triggered terrains.
Traditional statistical models for debris-flow susceptibility often overlook critical triggering mechanisms and geotechnical parameters. To address this, we propose an innovative framework that couples the Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) statistical model with the TRIGRS physical model, which simulates transient rainfall infiltration and grid-based regional slope stability. Focusing on seven towns in Beichuan County, China, we integrated thirteen environmental factors, geotechnical parameters, and historical hazard records to build a dual-driven "statistical-physical" evaluation framework. Our methodology consists of three steps: (1) Use TRIGRS to compute rainfall-induced safety factors (FS) and identify unstable zones (FS < 1), which serve as the positive-sample database for MaxEnt; (2) Employ the MaxEnt model-using the TRIGRS-derived positive samples and historical debris-flow factors-to predict the spatial distribution of susceptibility; (3) Integrate both outputs spatially in GIS using dynamic weighting. Validation shows that the hybrid model improves prediction accuracy by 21% compared to MaxEnt alone (AUC = 0.845). Its susceptibility map corrects 34.7% of the overpredicted areas from the statistical model and enlarges stable zones by 1.8 times. Additionally, to determine the optimal weighting between machine learning and the physical model, we tested three weight combinations and found that a 0.55:0.45 ratio (MaxEnt: TRIGRS) yields the best performance. Using an independent validation set from another study area, we correctly identified 83.6% of the historical debris-flow events in Changtan, demonstrating the framework's ability to integrate geostatistical patterns with geomechanical processes. This coupled framework offers a paradigm for multi-hazard chain assessment in complex terrain and can be directly applied to debris-flow early warning and regional disaster mitigation planning.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.