Veronica Hadjipanayi, Dylan Zhu-Dong, Casimir Ludwig, Christopher Kent
{"title":"多目标跟踪过程中注意力分配不均:来自眼动追踪研究的证据。","authors":"Veronica Hadjipanayi, Dylan Zhu-Dong, Casimir Ludwig, Christopher Kent","doi":"10.1177/17470218251362833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many situations, such as driving and playing team sports, we are required to allocate our attention unevenly across multiple moving targets that have different levels of relevance or importance (priority) to us. While previous studies have demonstrated an apparent ability to allocate attention in an uneven way to objects/regions in MOT, how such differential prioritisation comes about is still an open question. In this study, we investigated the role of eye movements in a MOT task where two targets varied in their likelihood of being queried for a motion direction estimate. As the priority of a target increased, participants fixated on or near the object more frequently and longer, and their direction estimates were more accurate. We explored the role of different tracking strategies (centroid vs target-switching), investigating how these are differentially employed depending on target priority. Our findings support the flexible deployment of attention in a graded manner and demonstrate that differential prioritisation primarily involves differential looking between targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251362833"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: Unequal attention allocation during Multiple Object Tracking: Evidence from an eye-tracking study.\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Hadjipanayi, Dylan Zhu-Dong, Casimir Ludwig, Christopher Kent\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17470218251362833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In many situations, such as driving and playing team sports, we are required to allocate our attention unevenly across multiple moving targets that have different levels of relevance or importance (priority) to us. While previous studies have demonstrated an apparent ability to allocate attention in an uneven way to objects/regions in MOT, how such differential prioritisation comes about is still an open question. In this study, we investigated the role of eye movements in a MOT task where two targets varied in their likelihood of being queried for a motion direction estimate. As the priority of a target increased, participants fixated on or near the object more frequently and longer, and their direction estimates were more accurate. We explored the role of different tracking strategies (centroid vs target-switching), investigating how these are differentially employed depending on target priority. Our findings support the flexible deployment of attention in a graded manner and demonstrate that differential prioritisation primarily involves differential looking between targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17470218251362833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251362833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251362833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
EXPRESS: Unequal attention allocation during Multiple Object Tracking: Evidence from an eye-tracking study.
In many situations, such as driving and playing team sports, we are required to allocate our attention unevenly across multiple moving targets that have different levels of relevance or importance (priority) to us. While previous studies have demonstrated an apparent ability to allocate attention in an uneven way to objects/regions in MOT, how such differential prioritisation comes about is still an open question. In this study, we investigated the role of eye movements in a MOT task where two targets varied in their likelihood of being queried for a motion direction estimate. As the priority of a target increased, participants fixated on or near the object more frequently and longer, and their direction estimates were more accurate. We explored the role of different tracking strategies (centroid vs target-switching), investigating how these are differentially employed depending on target priority. Our findings support the flexible deployment of attention in a graded manner and demonstrate that differential prioritisation primarily involves differential looking between targets.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.