多目标跟踪过程中注意力分配不均:来自眼动追踪研究的证据。

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY
Veronica Hadjipanayi, Dylan Zhu-Dong, Casimir Ludwig, Christopher Kent
{"title":"多目标跟踪过程中注意力分配不均:来自眼动追踪研究的证据。","authors":"Veronica Hadjipanayi, Dylan Zhu-Dong, Casimir Ludwig, Christopher Kent","doi":"10.1177/17470218251362833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In many situations, such as driving and playing team sports, we are required to allocate our attention unevenly across multiple moving targets that have different levels of relevance or importance (priority) to us. While previous studies have demonstrated an apparent ability to allocate attention in an uneven way to objects/regions in MOT, how such differential prioritisation comes about is still an open question. In this study, we investigated the role of eye movements in a MOT task where two targets varied in their likelihood of being queried for a motion direction estimate. As the priority of a target increased, participants fixated on or near the object more frequently and longer, and their direction estimates were more accurate. We explored the role of different tracking strategies (centroid vs target-switching), investigating how these are differentially employed depending on target priority. Our findings support the flexible deployment of attention in a graded manner and demonstrate that differential prioritisation primarily involves differential looking between targets.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218251362833"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EXPRESS: Unequal attention allocation during Multiple Object Tracking: Evidence from an eye-tracking study.\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Hadjipanayi, Dylan Zhu-Dong, Casimir Ludwig, Christopher Kent\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17470218251362833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In many situations, such as driving and playing team sports, we are required to allocate our attention unevenly across multiple moving targets that have different levels of relevance or importance (priority) to us. While previous studies have demonstrated an apparent ability to allocate attention in an uneven way to objects/regions in MOT, how such differential prioritisation comes about is still an open question. In this study, we investigated the role of eye movements in a MOT task where two targets varied in their likelihood of being queried for a motion direction estimate. As the priority of a target increased, participants fixated on or near the object more frequently and longer, and their direction estimates were more accurate. We explored the role of different tracking strategies (centroid vs target-switching), investigating how these are differentially employed depending on target priority. Our findings support the flexible deployment of attention in a graded manner and demonstrate that differential prioritisation primarily involves differential looking between targets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17470218251362833\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251362833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251362833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多情况下,例如驾驶和团队运动,我们需要将注意力不均匀地分配到多个对我们具有不同相关性或重要性(优先级)的移动目标上。虽然之前的研究已经证明了在MOT中以不平衡的方式分配注意力到物体/区域的明显能力,但这种不同的优先级是如何产生的仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。在这项研究中,我们调查了眼球运动在MOT任务中的作用,其中两个目标被询问运动方向估计的可能性不同。当一个目标的优先级增加时,参与者盯着或靠近这个目标的频率和时间会增加,他们对方向的估计也会更准确。我们探索了不同的跟踪策略(质心vs目标切换)的作用,调查了这些策略是如何根据目标优先级而不同地使用的。我们的研究结果支持以分级方式灵活部署注意力,并证明区分优先级主要涉及不同目标之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EXPRESS: Unequal attention allocation during Multiple Object Tracking: Evidence from an eye-tracking study.

In many situations, such as driving and playing team sports, we are required to allocate our attention unevenly across multiple moving targets that have different levels of relevance or importance (priority) to us. While previous studies have demonstrated an apparent ability to allocate attention in an uneven way to objects/regions in MOT, how such differential prioritisation comes about is still an open question. In this study, we investigated the role of eye movements in a MOT task where two targets varied in their likelihood of being queried for a motion direction estimate. As the priority of a target increased, participants fixated on or near the object more frequently and longer, and their direction estimates were more accurate. We explored the role of different tracking strategies (centroid vs target-switching), investigating how these are differentially employed depending on target priority. Our findings support the flexible deployment of attention in a graded manner and demonstrate that differential prioritisation primarily involves differential looking between targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信