一种辅助鲁棒半场矢量控制实验设计的功率分析框架。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Andrea M Kipingu, Dickson W Lwetoijera, Kija R Ng'habi, Samson S Kiware, Mafalda Viana, Paul C D Johnson
{"title":"一种辅助鲁棒半场矢量控制实验设计的功率分析框架。","authors":"Andrea M Kipingu, Dickson W Lwetoijera, Kija R Ng'habi, Samson S Kiware, Mafalda Viana, Paul C D Johnson","doi":"10.1186/s12936-025-05454-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Semi-field experiments are an efficient way of assessing the impacts of potential new vector control tools (VCTs) before field trials. However, their design is critically important to ensure their results are unbiased and informative. An essential element of the design of semi-field experiments is power analysis, which empowers researchers to ensure that only designs with adequate statistical power are adopted. In this study, a methodology was developed, and its use was demonstrated in a tutorial, to determine the required number of semi-field chambers, sampling frequency and the number of mosquitoes required to achieve sufficient power for evaluating the impact of a single VCT or two in combination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By analysing data simulated from a generalized linear mixed-effects model, power was estimated for various experimental designs, including short- (24 h) vs. long-term (3 months) experiments and single vs. combined application of interventions (e.g., insecticide-treated nets combined with pyriproxyfen autodissemination).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although power increased with increasing number of chambers, sampling frequency and the number of mosquitoes, the number of chambers and variance between chambers were the dominant factors determining power relative to all other design choices. High variance between chambers decreased power, highlighting the importance of making conditions similar among chambers, by reducing variation if possible and by rotating variables if not. As compared to a single intervention, an additional intervention required an increase in the number of chambers, while short and long experiments were similar in terms of key aspects such as the number of chambers per treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Determining the most efficient experimental design for a semi-field experiment will depend on a balance of design choices and resource constraints. The power analysis framework and tutorial provided here can aid in the robust design of these widely used experiments and ultimately facilitate the development of new vector control tools (VCTs).</p>","PeriodicalId":18317,"journal":{"name":"Malaria Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A power analysis framework to aid the design of robust semi-field vector control experiments.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea M Kipingu, Dickson W Lwetoijera, Kija R Ng'habi, Samson S Kiware, Mafalda Viana, Paul C D Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12936-025-05454-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Semi-field experiments are an efficient way of assessing the impacts of potential new vector control tools (VCTs) before field trials. However, their design is critically important to ensure their results are unbiased and informative. An essential element of the design of semi-field experiments is power analysis, which empowers researchers to ensure that only designs with adequate statistical power are adopted. In this study, a methodology was developed, and its use was demonstrated in a tutorial, to determine the required number of semi-field chambers, sampling frequency and the number of mosquitoes required to achieve sufficient power for evaluating the impact of a single VCT or two in combination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By analysing data simulated from a generalized linear mixed-effects model, power was estimated for various experimental designs, including short- (24 h) vs. long-term (3 months) experiments and single vs. combined application of interventions (e.g., insecticide-treated nets combined with pyriproxyfen autodissemination).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although power increased with increasing number of chambers, sampling frequency and the number of mosquitoes, the number of chambers and variance between chambers were the dominant factors determining power relative to all other design choices. High variance between chambers decreased power, highlighting the importance of making conditions similar among chambers, by reducing variation if possible and by rotating variables if not. As compared to a single intervention, an additional intervention required an increase in the number of chambers, while short and long experiments were similar in terms of key aspects such as the number of chambers per treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Determining the most efficient experimental design for a semi-field experiment will depend on a balance of design choices and resource constraints. The power analysis framework and tutorial provided here can aid in the robust design of these widely used experiments and ultimately facilitate the development of new vector control tools (VCTs).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaria Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12275456/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaria Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05454-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaria Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-025-05454-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:半田间试验是在田间试验前评估潜在的新型病媒控制工具(vct)影响的有效方法。然而,他们的设计是至关重要的,以确保他们的结果是公正的和信息丰富的。半现场实验设计的一个基本要素是功率分析,它使研究人员能够确保只采用具有足够统计功率的设计。在这项研究中,开发了一种方法,并在教程中演示了该方法的使用,以确定所需的半现场室数量、采样频率和获得足够的功率以评估单个或两个VCT组合的影响所需的蚊子数量。方法:通过分析广义线性混合效应模型模拟的数据,估计各种实验设计的功率,包括短期(24小时)与长期(3个月)实验,以及单一与联合应用干预措施(例如,驱虫蚊帐与吡丙醚自动喷洒相结合)。结果:虽然功率随室数、采样频率和蚊虫数量的增加而增加,但室数和室间方差是决定功率的主要因素。室之间的高差异降低了功率,强调了使室之间的条件相似的重要性,如果可能的话,通过减少变化,如果不旋转变量。与单一干预相比,额外的干预需要增加腔室的数量,而短期和长期的实验在关键方面是相似的,比如每次治疗的腔室数量。结论:确定最有效的半场实验设计将取决于设计选择和资源约束的平衡。这里提供的功率分析框架和教程可以帮助这些广泛使用的实验的稳健设计,并最终促进新的矢量控制工具(vct)的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A power analysis framework to aid the design of robust semi-field vector control experiments.

Background: Semi-field experiments are an efficient way of assessing the impacts of potential new vector control tools (VCTs) before field trials. However, their design is critically important to ensure their results are unbiased and informative. An essential element of the design of semi-field experiments is power analysis, which empowers researchers to ensure that only designs with adequate statistical power are adopted. In this study, a methodology was developed, and its use was demonstrated in a tutorial, to determine the required number of semi-field chambers, sampling frequency and the number of mosquitoes required to achieve sufficient power for evaluating the impact of a single VCT or two in combination.

Methods: By analysing data simulated from a generalized linear mixed-effects model, power was estimated for various experimental designs, including short- (24 h) vs. long-term (3 months) experiments and single vs. combined application of interventions (e.g., insecticide-treated nets combined with pyriproxyfen autodissemination).

Results: Although power increased with increasing number of chambers, sampling frequency and the number of mosquitoes, the number of chambers and variance between chambers were the dominant factors determining power relative to all other design choices. High variance between chambers decreased power, highlighting the importance of making conditions similar among chambers, by reducing variation if possible and by rotating variables if not. As compared to a single intervention, an additional intervention required an increase in the number of chambers, while short and long experiments were similar in terms of key aspects such as the number of chambers per treatment.

Conclusion: Determining the most efficient experimental design for a semi-field experiment will depend on a balance of design choices and resource constraints. The power analysis framework and tutorial provided here can aid in the robust design of these widely used experiments and ultimately facilitate the development of new vector control tools (VCTs).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Malaria Journal
Malaria Journal 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
23.30%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Malaria Journal is aimed at the scientific community interested in malaria in its broadest sense. It is the only journal that publishes exclusively articles on malaria and, as such, it aims to bring together knowledge from the different specialities involved in this very broad discipline, from the bench to the bedside and to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信