利用感知疲劳来识别衰老和多发性硬化症的认知和行动障碍。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Di-Hua Luo, Roee Holtzer
{"title":"利用感知疲劳来识别衰老和多发性硬化症的认知和行动障碍。","authors":"Di-Hua Luo, Roee Holtzer","doi":"10.1177/08919887251362468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPerceived fatigability-subjective physical or mental energy depletion within specified activity contexts-is prevalent in aging and neurological conditions. Although the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) is validated for older adults and those with multiple sclerosis (OAMS), its subscale cut-offs and clinical relevance for cognitive and mobility outcomes have not been examined in neurologically affected aging populations.MethodsWe studied 224 older adults (≥60 years): 109 OAMS and 115 controls who completed the PFS, neuropsychological testing, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and, for OAMS, the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed PFS subscales' accuracy in discriminating MS, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), mobility impairment (SPPB ≤9), and worse MS-related disability (PDDS ≥2). Logistic regression adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates generated refined ROC curves and cut-offs.ResultsBoth PFS subscales demonstrated moderate accuracy (area under the curve 0.59-0.75) for discriminating MS, MCI, and mobility impairment when unadjusted, with accuracy often exceeding 0.80 after covariate adjustment. Among OAMS, mental fatigability more accurately identified MCI, whereas physical fatigability better detected worse MS-related disability. Cut-offs were higher in OAMS than in healthy controls, varying by subscale and clinical outcome. Adjusted analyses revealed nuances in cut-offs, with physical fatigability thresholds consistently higher than mental fatigability.ConclusionPFS subscales can identify MS, cognitive impairment, and mobility impairment in older adults. Cut-offs appear population- and outcome-specific, indicating that thresholds derived from healthy older cohorts may not apply directly to neurological populations. Covariate adjustment refines discriminative accuracy, potentially guiding need for further functional monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":16028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"8919887251362468"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing Perceived Fatigability to Identify Cognitive and Mobility Impairments in Aging and Multiple Sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Di-Hua Luo, Roee Holtzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08919887251362468\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundPerceived fatigability-subjective physical or mental energy depletion within specified activity contexts-is prevalent in aging and neurological conditions. Although the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) is validated for older adults and those with multiple sclerosis (OAMS), its subscale cut-offs and clinical relevance for cognitive and mobility outcomes have not been examined in neurologically affected aging populations.MethodsWe studied 224 older adults (≥60 years): 109 OAMS and 115 controls who completed the PFS, neuropsychological testing, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and, for OAMS, the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed PFS subscales' accuracy in discriminating MS, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), mobility impairment (SPPB ≤9), and worse MS-related disability (PDDS ≥2). Logistic regression adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates generated refined ROC curves and cut-offs.ResultsBoth PFS subscales demonstrated moderate accuracy (area under the curve 0.59-0.75) for discriminating MS, MCI, and mobility impairment when unadjusted, with accuracy often exceeding 0.80 after covariate adjustment. Among OAMS, mental fatigability more accurately identified MCI, whereas physical fatigability better detected worse MS-related disability. Cut-offs were higher in OAMS than in healthy controls, varying by subscale and clinical outcome. Adjusted analyses revealed nuances in cut-offs, with physical fatigability thresholds consistently higher than mental fatigability.ConclusionPFS subscales can identify MS, cognitive impairment, and mobility impairment in older adults. Cut-offs appear population- and outcome-specific, indicating that thresholds derived from healthy older cohorts may not apply directly to neurological populations. Covariate adjustment refines discriminative accuracy, potentially guiding need for further functional monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8919887251362468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251362468\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887251362468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感知疲劳-在特定活动环境下主观的身体或精神能量消耗-在衰老和神经系统疾病中普遍存在。尽管匹兹堡疲劳量表(PFS)在老年人和多发性硬化症(OAMS)患者中得到了验证,但其亚量表截断值和认知和活动能力结果的临床相关性尚未在神经系统受影响的老年人群中得到检验。方法我们研究了224名老年人(≥60岁):109名OAMS和115名对照组,他们完成了PFS、神经心理测试、短体能测试(SPPB),对于OAMS,患者确定的疾病步骤(PDDS)。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析评估PFS量表在区分多发性硬化症、轻度认知障碍(MCI)、活动能力障碍(SPPB≤9)和更严重的多发性硬化症相关残疾(PDDS≥2)方面的准确性。调整了人口统计学和临床协变量的Logistic回归产生了精细的ROC曲线和截止值。结果两种PFS子量表在鉴别多发性硬硬症、轻度认知障碍和行动障碍时均具有中等准确度(曲线下面积0.59 ~ 0.75),经协变量调整后准确度通常超过0.80。在OAMS中,精神疲劳更准确地识别MCI,而身体疲劳更能识别更严重的ms相关残疾。OAMS组的临界值高于健康对照组,因亚量表和临床结果而异。调整后的分析揭示了界限的细微差别,身体疲劳阈值始终高于精神疲劳阈值。结论pfs亚量表可识别老年人多发性硬化症、认知障碍和行动障碍。截断值似乎是特定于人群和结果的,表明从健康老年人队列中得出的阈值可能不适用于神经学人群。协变量调整改进了判别的准确性,潜在地指导了进一步功能监测的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing Perceived Fatigability to Identify Cognitive and Mobility Impairments in Aging and Multiple Sclerosis.

BackgroundPerceived fatigability-subjective physical or mental energy depletion within specified activity contexts-is prevalent in aging and neurological conditions. Although the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale (PFS) is validated for older adults and those with multiple sclerosis (OAMS), its subscale cut-offs and clinical relevance for cognitive and mobility outcomes have not been examined in neurologically affected aging populations.MethodsWe studied 224 older adults (≥60 years): 109 OAMS and 115 controls who completed the PFS, neuropsychological testing, the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and, for OAMS, the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed PFS subscales' accuracy in discriminating MS, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), mobility impairment (SPPB ≤9), and worse MS-related disability (PDDS ≥2). Logistic regression adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates generated refined ROC curves and cut-offs.ResultsBoth PFS subscales demonstrated moderate accuracy (area under the curve 0.59-0.75) for discriminating MS, MCI, and mobility impairment when unadjusted, with accuracy often exceeding 0.80 after covariate adjustment. Among OAMS, mental fatigability more accurately identified MCI, whereas physical fatigability better detected worse MS-related disability. Cut-offs were higher in OAMS than in healthy controls, varying by subscale and clinical outcome. Adjusted analyses revealed nuances in cut-offs, with physical fatigability thresholds consistently higher than mental fatigability.ConclusionPFS subscales can identify MS, cognitive impairment, and mobility impairment in older adults. Cut-offs appear population- and outcome-specific, indicating that thresholds derived from healthy older cohorts may not apply directly to neurological populations. Covariate adjustment refines discriminative accuracy, potentially guiding need for further functional monitoring.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (JGP) brings together original research, clinical reviews, and timely case reports on neuropsychiatric care of aging patients, including age-related biologic, neurologic, and psychiatric illnesses; psychosocial problems; forensic issues; and family care. The journal offers the latest peer-reviewed information on cognitive, mood, anxiety, addictive, and sleep disorders in older patients, as well as tested diagnostic tools and therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信