微创内镜联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂肾结石:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-18 DOI:10.1177/08927790251360265
Ahmed Mohamed Tawfeek, Ahmed Higazy, Moatazbellah Mohamed Elkenany, Khaled Taema, Hisham Arafa
{"title":"微创内镜联合肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗复杂肾结石:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Ahmed Mohamed Tawfeek, Ahmed Higazy, Moatazbellah Mohamed Elkenany, Khaled Taema, Hisham Arafa","doi":"10.1177/08927790251360265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mECIRS) <i>vs</i> percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in managing complex renal stones. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> A randomized controlled study was conducted at our tertiary center between July 2022 and July 2024, involving 100 patients with complex renal stones who were randomly allocated for PCNL or mECIRS. The stone burden was determined based on Guy's score using a non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tract; patients with Guy's Stone Score of III or IV were included in our study. Our primary objective was to assess grade A single session stone-free rate (SS-SFR) in both procedures after 1 month, defined as no stone residual after a single session procedure. Secondary outcomes included grade A (≤2 mm residual), Grade C (2.1-4 mm residual), and overall SFRs, complication rates (per Clavien-Dindo classification), operative time, fluoroscopy time, hospital stay, and overall cost. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patient and stone characteristics were similar in both groups. Grade A SS-SFR revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of the mECIRS group compared with the PCNL group (51% <i>vs</i> 32.6%, respectively, <i>p</i>-value = 0.0275). However, the final grade A SFR after auxiliary procedures was comparable (40.8% for the PCNL group compared with 51% for the ECIRS group, <i>p</i>-value = 0.557). The mECIRS showed a less operative and fluoroscopy time. The complication rate was 38.77% <i>vs</i> 14.28% in the PCNL and mECIRS, respectively, where it was higher in the former, with a statistically significant value (<i>p</i>-value = 0.006). The mECIRS group experienced shorter hospital stay and comparable cost-effectiveness. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> mECIRS is effective and safe in managing patients with complex renal stones in a single session with fewer comorbidities than standard PCNL. The study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov with a registration number: NCT06085794.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"998-1004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mini-Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery <i>vs</i> Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Complex Nephrolithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Mohamed Tawfeek, Ahmed Higazy, Moatazbellah Mohamed Elkenany, Khaled Taema, Hisham Arafa\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08927790251360265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mECIRS) <i>vs</i> percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in managing complex renal stones. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> A randomized controlled study was conducted at our tertiary center between July 2022 and July 2024, involving 100 patients with complex renal stones who were randomly allocated for PCNL or mECIRS. The stone burden was determined based on Guy's score using a non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tract; patients with Guy's Stone Score of III or IV were included in our study. Our primary objective was to assess grade A single session stone-free rate (SS-SFR) in both procedures after 1 month, defined as no stone residual after a single session procedure. Secondary outcomes included grade A (≤2 mm residual), Grade C (2.1-4 mm residual), and overall SFRs, complication rates (per Clavien-Dindo classification), operative time, fluoroscopy time, hospital stay, and overall cost. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patient and stone characteristics were similar in both groups. Grade A SS-SFR revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of the mECIRS group compared with the PCNL group (51% <i>vs</i> 32.6%, respectively, <i>p</i>-value = 0.0275). However, the final grade A SFR after auxiliary procedures was comparable (40.8% for the PCNL group compared with 51% for the ECIRS group, <i>p</i>-value = 0.557). The mECIRS showed a less operative and fluoroscopy time. The complication rate was 38.77% <i>vs</i> 14.28% in the PCNL and mECIRS, respectively, where it was higher in the former, with a statistically significant value (<i>p</i>-value = 0.006). The mECIRS group experienced shorter hospital stay and comparable cost-effectiveness. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> mECIRS is effective and safe in managing patients with complex renal stones in a single session with fewer comorbidities than standard PCNL. The study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov with a registration number: NCT06085794.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"998-1004\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251360265\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790251360265","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较微创内镜联合肾内手术(mECIRS)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)治疗复杂肾结石的疗效。材料与方法:于2022年7月至2024年7月在我院三级中心进行了一项随机对照研究,纳入100例复杂肾结石患者,随机分配PCNL或mECIRS。结石负荷是根据Guy的评分来确定的,使用的是尿道非对比计算机断层扫描;盖氏结石评分为III或IV的患者纳入我们的研究。我们的主要目标是评估1个月后两种手术的A级单次无结石率(SS-SFR),定义为单次手术后无结石残留。次要结局包括A级(残余≤2mm)、C级(残余2.1-4 mm)、总sfr、并发症发生率(按Clavien-Dindo分级)、手术时间、透视时间、住院时间和总费用。结果:两组患者及结石特征相似。与PCNL组相比,mECIRS组的A级SS-SFR有统计学差异(51% vs 32.6%, p值= 0.0275)。然而,辅助手术后的最终A级SFR是相当的(PCNL组为40.8%,ECIRS组为51%,p值= 0.557)。mECIRS显示手术时间和透视时间较短。PCNL和mECIRS的并发症发生率分别为38.77%和14.28%,前者更高,差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.006)。mECIRS组住院时间较短,成本效益相当。结论:与标准PCNL相比,mECIRS在单次治疗复杂肾结石患者中有效且安全,合并症较少。该研究已在Clinicaltrial.gov注册,注册号为NCT06085794。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mini-Endoscopic Combined Intrarenal Surgery vs Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Complex Nephrolithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective: To evaluate mini-endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (mECIRS) vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in managing complex renal stones. Material and Methods: A randomized controlled study was conducted at our tertiary center between July 2022 and July 2024, involving 100 patients with complex renal stones who were randomly allocated for PCNL or mECIRS. The stone burden was determined based on Guy's score using a non-contrast computed tomography of the urinary tract; patients with Guy's Stone Score of III or IV were included in our study. Our primary objective was to assess grade A single session stone-free rate (SS-SFR) in both procedures after 1 month, defined as no stone residual after a single session procedure. Secondary outcomes included grade A (≤2 mm residual), Grade C (2.1-4 mm residual), and overall SFRs, complication rates (per Clavien-Dindo classification), operative time, fluoroscopy time, hospital stay, and overall cost. Results: Patient and stone characteristics were similar in both groups. Grade A SS-SFR revealed a statistically significant difference in favor of the mECIRS group compared with the PCNL group (51% vs 32.6%, respectively, p-value = 0.0275). However, the final grade A SFR after auxiliary procedures was comparable (40.8% for the PCNL group compared with 51% for the ECIRS group, p-value = 0.557). The mECIRS showed a less operative and fluoroscopy time. The complication rate was 38.77% vs 14.28% in the PCNL and mECIRS, respectively, where it was higher in the former, with a statistically significant value (p-value = 0.006). The mECIRS group experienced shorter hospital stay and comparable cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: mECIRS is effective and safe in managing patients with complex renal stones in a single session with fewer comorbidities than standard PCNL. The study was registered at Clinicaltrial.gov with a registration number: NCT06085794.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信