肥大细胞与间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征再谈。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Hannah Ruetten, Rory Ritts, Mary Namugosa, Wencheng Li, Robert Evans, Gopal Badlani, Stephen J Walker
{"title":"肥大细胞与间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征再谈。","authors":"Hannah Ruetten, Rory Ritts, Mary Namugosa, Wencheng Li, Robert Evans, Gopal Badlani, Stephen J Walker","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06213-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>There is significant variation in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) biopsy processing and reporting. The objective of this study was to review pathology reports from a large IC/BPS patient cohort to identify differences in findings. We hypothesize that variation in IC/BPS bladder biopsy reporting might be most frequent when it comes to mast-cell counts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 461 diagnostic pathology reports collected from our IRB-approved prospective study of patients diagnosed with IC/BPS at the Urology Clinic at Wake Forest Baptist Hospital from October 2011 to July 2023 (IRB00018552). Data were assigned as continuous or categorical variables. Groups were compared using Student's t test, Mann-Whitney, or Chi-squared tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staining strategy for mast-cell visualization differed between pathologists and included in order of frequency mast-cell tryptase (TPSAB1), CD117 (KIT), unspecified stain, a combination of stains, and toluidine blue. Mast-cell count was reported as a single number, range, or qualitatively. Pathologists used units of high-powered field (HPF), mm<sup>2</sup>, or did not specify. As expected, average mast-cell count per HPF was significantly lower than per mm<sup>2</sup> across all stains (p < 0.0001). Average count with KIT was significantly lower than TPSAB1 (p < 0.0001). This trend remained significant when considering only KIT and TPSAB1 counts per HPF (p = 0.0007). Additionally, reports identified squamous metaplasia, acute inflammation, and/or chronic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a lack of standardization regarding histological analysis of bladder biopsies from patients with IC/BPS, leading to inconsistent data and confusion surrounding the significance of pathology report findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mast Cells and Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Revisited.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Ruetten, Rory Ritts, Mary Namugosa, Wencheng Li, Robert Evans, Gopal Badlani, Stephen J Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-025-06213-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>There is significant variation in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) biopsy processing and reporting. The objective of this study was to review pathology reports from a large IC/BPS patient cohort to identify differences in findings. We hypothesize that variation in IC/BPS bladder biopsy reporting might be most frequent when it comes to mast-cell counts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 461 diagnostic pathology reports collected from our IRB-approved prospective study of patients diagnosed with IC/BPS at the Urology Clinic at Wake Forest Baptist Hospital from October 2011 to July 2023 (IRB00018552). Data were assigned as continuous or categorical variables. Groups were compared using Student's t test, Mann-Whitney, or Chi-squared tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staining strategy for mast-cell visualization differed between pathologists and included in order of frequency mast-cell tryptase (TPSAB1), CD117 (KIT), unspecified stain, a combination of stains, and toluidine blue. Mast-cell count was reported as a single number, range, or qualitatively. Pathologists used units of high-powered field (HPF), mm<sup>2</sup>, or did not specify. As expected, average mast-cell count per HPF was significantly lower than per mm<sup>2</sup> across all stains (p < 0.0001). Average count with KIT was significantly lower than TPSAB1 (p < 0.0001). This trend remained significant when considering only KIT and TPSAB1 counts per HPF (p = 0.0007). Additionally, reports identified squamous metaplasia, acute inflammation, and/or chronic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a lack of standardization regarding histological analysis of bladder biopsies from patients with IC/BPS, leading to inconsistent data and confusion surrounding the significance of pathology report findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06213-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06213-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言和假设:间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征(IC/BPS)的活检处理和报告存在显著差异。本研究的目的是回顾来自大型IC/BPS患者队列的病理报告,以确定结果的差异。我们假设,当涉及到肥大细胞计数时,IC/BPS膀胱活检报告的变化可能是最常见的。方法:我们对2011年10月至2023年7月在维克森林浸信会医院泌尿外科诊所诊断为IC/BPS的患者的前瞻性研究(IRB00018552)收集的461份诊断病理报告进行了回顾性分析。数据被分配为连续变量或分类变量。各组间比较采用学生t检验、Mann-Whitney检验或卡方检验。结果:不同病理学家对肥大细胞可视化的染色策略不同,包括肥大细胞胰蛋白酶(TPSAB1)、CD117 (KIT)、未指定染色、组合染色和甲苯胺蓝的频率。肥大细胞计数报告为单个数字、范围或定性。病理学家使用高倍率场(HPF)单位,mm2,或没有指定。正如预期的那样,在所有染色中,每HPF的平均肥大细胞计数明显低于每mm2 (p)。结论:IC/BPS患者膀胱活检的组织学分析缺乏标准化,导致数据不一致,病理报告发现的意义也模糊不清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mast Cells and Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Revisited.

Introduction and hypothesis: There is significant variation in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) biopsy processing and reporting. The objective of this study was to review pathology reports from a large IC/BPS patient cohort to identify differences in findings. We hypothesize that variation in IC/BPS bladder biopsy reporting might be most frequent when it comes to mast-cell counts.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 461 diagnostic pathology reports collected from our IRB-approved prospective study of patients diagnosed with IC/BPS at the Urology Clinic at Wake Forest Baptist Hospital from October 2011 to July 2023 (IRB00018552). Data were assigned as continuous or categorical variables. Groups were compared using Student's t test, Mann-Whitney, or Chi-squared tests.

Results: Staining strategy for mast-cell visualization differed between pathologists and included in order of frequency mast-cell tryptase (TPSAB1), CD117 (KIT), unspecified stain, a combination of stains, and toluidine blue. Mast-cell count was reported as a single number, range, or qualitatively. Pathologists used units of high-powered field (HPF), mm2, or did not specify. As expected, average mast-cell count per HPF was significantly lower than per mm2 across all stains (p < 0.0001). Average count with KIT was significantly lower than TPSAB1 (p < 0.0001). This trend remained significant when considering only KIT and TPSAB1 counts per HPF (p = 0.0007). Additionally, reports identified squamous metaplasia, acute inflammation, and/or chronic inflammation.

Conclusions: There is a lack of standardization regarding histological analysis of bladder biopsies from patients with IC/BPS, leading to inconsistent data and confusion surrounding the significance of pathology report findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信