Hannah Ruetten, Rory Ritts, Mary Namugosa, Wencheng Li, Robert Evans, Gopal Badlani, Stephen J Walker
{"title":"肥大细胞与间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征再谈。","authors":"Hannah Ruetten, Rory Ritts, Mary Namugosa, Wencheng Li, Robert Evans, Gopal Badlani, Stephen J Walker","doi":"10.1007/s00192-025-06213-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>There is significant variation in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) biopsy processing and reporting. The objective of this study was to review pathology reports from a large IC/BPS patient cohort to identify differences in findings. We hypothesize that variation in IC/BPS bladder biopsy reporting might be most frequent when it comes to mast-cell counts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 461 diagnostic pathology reports collected from our IRB-approved prospective study of patients diagnosed with IC/BPS at the Urology Clinic at Wake Forest Baptist Hospital from October 2011 to July 2023 (IRB00018552). Data were assigned as continuous or categorical variables. Groups were compared using Student's t test, Mann-Whitney, or Chi-squared tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staining strategy for mast-cell visualization differed between pathologists and included in order of frequency mast-cell tryptase (TPSAB1), CD117 (KIT), unspecified stain, a combination of stains, and toluidine blue. Mast-cell count was reported as a single number, range, or qualitatively. Pathologists used units of high-powered field (HPF), mm<sup>2</sup>, or did not specify. As expected, average mast-cell count per HPF was significantly lower than per mm<sup>2</sup> across all stains (p < 0.0001). Average count with KIT was significantly lower than TPSAB1 (p < 0.0001). This trend remained significant when considering only KIT and TPSAB1 counts per HPF (p = 0.0007). Additionally, reports identified squamous metaplasia, acute inflammation, and/or chronic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a lack of standardization regarding histological analysis of bladder biopsies from patients with IC/BPS, leading to inconsistent data and confusion surrounding the significance of pathology report findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mast Cells and Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Revisited.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Ruetten, Rory Ritts, Mary Namugosa, Wencheng Li, Robert Evans, Gopal Badlani, Stephen J Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00192-025-06213-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>There is significant variation in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) biopsy processing and reporting. The objective of this study was to review pathology reports from a large IC/BPS patient cohort to identify differences in findings. We hypothesize that variation in IC/BPS bladder biopsy reporting might be most frequent when it comes to mast-cell counts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of 461 diagnostic pathology reports collected from our IRB-approved prospective study of patients diagnosed with IC/BPS at the Urology Clinic at Wake Forest Baptist Hospital from October 2011 to July 2023 (IRB00018552). Data were assigned as continuous or categorical variables. Groups were compared using Student's t test, Mann-Whitney, or Chi-squared tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Staining strategy for mast-cell visualization differed between pathologists and included in order of frequency mast-cell tryptase (TPSAB1), CD117 (KIT), unspecified stain, a combination of stains, and toluidine blue. Mast-cell count was reported as a single number, range, or qualitatively. Pathologists used units of high-powered field (HPF), mm<sup>2</sup>, or did not specify. As expected, average mast-cell count per HPF was significantly lower than per mm<sup>2</sup> across all stains (p < 0.0001). Average count with KIT was significantly lower than TPSAB1 (p < 0.0001). This trend remained significant when considering only KIT and TPSAB1 counts per HPF (p = 0.0007). Additionally, reports identified squamous metaplasia, acute inflammation, and/or chronic inflammation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a lack of standardization regarding histological analysis of bladder biopsies from patients with IC/BPS, leading to inconsistent data and confusion surrounding the significance of pathology report findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urogynecology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06213-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-025-06213-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mast Cells and Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Revisited.
Introduction and hypothesis: There is significant variation in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) biopsy processing and reporting. The objective of this study was to review pathology reports from a large IC/BPS patient cohort to identify differences in findings. We hypothesize that variation in IC/BPS bladder biopsy reporting might be most frequent when it comes to mast-cell counts.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 461 diagnostic pathology reports collected from our IRB-approved prospective study of patients diagnosed with IC/BPS at the Urology Clinic at Wake Forest Baptist Hospital from October 2011 to July 2023 (IRB00018552). Data were assigned as continuous or categorical variables. Groups were compared using Student's t test, Mann-Whitney, or Chi-squared tests.
Results: Staining strategy for mast-cell visualization differed between pathologists and included in order of frequency mast-cell tryptase (TPSAB1), CD117 (KIT), unspecified stain, a combination of stains, and toluidine blue. Mast-cell count was reported as a single number, range, or qualitatively. Pathologists used units of high-powered field (HPF), mm2, or did not specify. As expected, average mast-cell count per HPF was significantly lower than per mm2 across all stains (p < 0.0001). Average count with KIT was significantly lower than TPSAB1 (p < 0.0001). This trend remained significant when considering only KIT and TPSAB1 counts per HPF (p = 0.0007). Additionally, reports identified squamous metaplasia, acute inflammation, and/or chronic inflammation.
Conclusions: There is a lack of standardization regarding histological analysis of bladder biopsies from patients with IC/BPS, leading to inconsistent data and confusion surrounding the significance of pathology report findings.
期刊介绍:
The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion