不可切除的转移性结直肠癌患者接受奥沙利铂加基于抗血管生成诱导方案的维持治疗:一项研究队列分析

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1080/14737140.2025.2536107
Giuseppe A Colloca, Antonella Venturino
{"title":"不可切除的转移性结直肠癌患者接受奥沙利铂加基于抗血管生成诱导方案的维持治疗:一项研究队列分析","authors":"Giuseppe A Colloca, Antonella Venturino","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2536107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Maintenance therapy is frequently proposed to patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the optimal regimen has not been defined, and studies have failed to characterize the patients who benefit from the maintenance strategy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A systematic search of studies of maintenance was performed. Prospective studies that evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of induction to progression and reported overall survival (OS) were selected. The efficacy of induction + maintenance therapy was assessed by the PFS/OS ratio. Twenty-one baseline variables were extracted and a linear regression was performed, separating cohorts in which maintenance included antiangiogenic agent (AAG)-based or fluoropyrimidine (FP)-based regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three study cohorts related to 18 trials were selected. Analysis of variables versus PFS/OS ratio showed a significant relationship with sex (23 cohorts; β = -0.0082, p-value = 0.016). In the 19 cohorts that received an AAG-based regimen, a benefit was found for females, patients receiving longer oxaliplatin-based induction chemotherapy, lung metastases, while in the 17 cohorts that received an FP-based treatment only patients without a previous primary tumor resection reported higher PFS/OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, female sex was associated with a more pronounced effect of maintenance regimens, particularly AAG-based.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1203-1211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintenance therapy in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin plus antiangiogenic-based induction regimen: a study cohorts analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe A Colloca, Antonella Venturino\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737140.2025.2536107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Maintenance therapy is frequently proposed to patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the optimal regimen has not been defined, and studies have failed to characterize the patients who benefit from the maintenance strategy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>A systematic search of studies of maintenance was performed. Prospective studies that evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of induction to progression and reported overall survival (OS) were selected. The efficacy of induction + maintenance therapy was assessed by the PFS/OS ratio. Twenty-one baseline variables were extracted and a linear regression was performed, separating cohorts in which maintenance included antiangiogenic agent (AAG)-based or fluoropyrimidine (FP)-based regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three study cohorts related to 18 trials were selected. Analysis of variables versus PFS/OS ratio showed a significant relationship with sex (23 cohorts; β = -0.0082, p-value = 0.016). In the 19 cohorts that received an AAG-based regimen, a benefit was found for females, patients receiving longer oxaliplatin-based induction chemotherapy, lung metastases, while in the 17 cohorts that received an FP-based treatment only patients without a previous primary tumor resection reported higher PFS/OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, female sex was associated with a more pronounced effect of maintenance regimens, particularly AAG-based.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1203-1211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2536107\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2536107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:不可切除的转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者经常建议维持治疗。然而,最佳方案尚未确定,研究未能确定从维持策略中受益的患者的特征。研究设计与方法:对维修相关研究进行了系统的检索。选择评估从诱导开始到进展的无进展生存期(PFS)和报告的总生存期(OS)的前瞻性研究。采用PFS/OS比值评价诱导+维持治疗的疗效。提取21个基线变量并进行线性回归,将维持包括基于抗血管生成药物(AAG)或基于氟嘧啶(FP)方案的队列分开。结果:共选择了23个研究队列,涉及18项试验。变量与PFS/OS比的分析显示与性别有显著关系(23个队列;β = -0.0082, p值= 0.016)。在接受以aag为基础的方案的19个队列中,女性患者接受更长时间的奥沙利铂诱导化疗,肺转移,而在接受以fp为基础的治疗的17个队列中,只有先前没有原发肿瘤切除术的患者报告更高的PFS/OS。结论:尽管研究存在异质性,但女性与维持方案的效果更为明显,尤其是基于aag的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maintenance therapy in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer receiving oxaliplatin plus antiangiogenic-based induction regimen: a study cohorts analysis.

Objectives: Maintenance therapy is frequently proposed to patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the optimal regimen has not been defined, and studies have failed to characterize the patients who benefit from the maintenance strategy.

Research design and methods: A systematic search of studies of maintenance was performed. Prospective studies that evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of induction to progression and reported overall survival (OS) were selected. The efficacy of induction + maintenance therapy was assessed by the PFS/OS ratio. Twenty-one baseline variables were extracted and a linear regression was performed, separating cohorts in which maintenance included antiangiogenic agent (AAG)-based or fluoropyrimidine (FP)-based regimen.

Results: Twenty-three study cohorts related to 18 trials were selected. Analysis of variables versus PFS/OS ratio showed a significant relationship with sex (23 cohorts; β = -0.0082, p-value = 0.016). In the 19 cohorts that received an AAG-based regimen, a benefit was found for females, patients receiving longer oxaliplatin-based induction chemotherapy, lung metastases, while in the 17 cohorts that received an FP-based treatment only patients without a previous primary tumor resection reported higher PFS/OS.

Conclusions: Despite the heterogeneity of the studies, female sex was associated with a more pronounced effect of maintenance regimens, particularly AAG-based.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care. Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信