Paolo Manzoni, David A Kaufman, Victoria Niklas, Mario Giuffrè, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Daniele De Luca
{"title":"新生儿重症监护室预防CLABSI的专家评论:支持研究药物过渡到临床实践。","authors":"Paolo Manzoni, David A Kaufman, Victoria Niklas, Mario Giuffrè, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Daniele De Luca","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-06329-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving medications, parenteral nutrition, and fluids in extremely premature (EP; i.e., 28 weeks' gestational age) infants. Indeed, CVCs have enabled increased survival and improved outcomes in EP infants over the last several decades. However, CVCs remain a major risk factor for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), which can lead to serious complications in this vulnerable population. While many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have adopted CVC bundles to reduce CLABSI risk, implementation remains inconsistent, contributing to significant variability across centers. A minimized and reproducible baseline rate of CLABSI is important not only to physicians caring for EP infants and their families but also to clinical investigators and regulatory authorities in the evaluation of experimental therapies aimed at combating the complications of prematurity, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, and impaired neurological development. CLABSIs may confound clinical outcomes and thus impact the interpretation of trial results. We propose a standardized central line bundle, informed by current clinical practice and a critical appraisal of the literature, for mandatory use in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent application of a standardized central line bundle would reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study sites, enabling more accurate benefit-risk assessments of experimental therapies, particularly those requiring central venous access, in this population of infants with a high unmet medical need.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving treatments in extremely premature infants, significantly improving their survival and outcomes. CVCs, however, are known to increase the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). • Central line bundles are routinely implemented in clinical practice with demonstrable benefit in reducing CLABSI. Still, their impact often wanes as the focus and stringency on bundle components and audit programs decrease.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• We propose a standardized central line bundle for mandatory use in clinical trials. This will help reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study centers, enabling a more accurate evaluation of the benefit-risk profile of experimental therapies-especially those requiring administration via central venous catheters.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 8","pages":"492"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert review of CLABSI prevention in the NICU: supporting the transition of investigational drugs into clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Manzoni, David A Kaufman, Victoria Niklas, Mario Giuffrè, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Daniele De Luca\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00431-025-06329-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving medications, parenteral nutrition, and fluids in extremely premature (EP; i.e., 28 weeks' gestational age) infants. Indeed, CVCs have enabled increased survival and improved outcomes in EP infants over the last several decades. However, CVCs remain a major risk factor for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), which can lead to serious complications in this vulnerable population. While many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have adopted CVC bundles to reduce CLABSI risk, implementation remains inconsistent, contributing to significant variability across centers. A minimized and reproducible baseline rate of CLABSI is important not only to physicians caring for EP infants and their families but also to clinical investigators and regulatory authorities in the evaluation of experimental therapies aimed at combating the complications of prematurity, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, and impaired neurological development. CLABSIs may confound clinical outcomes and thus impact the interpretation of trial results. We propose a standardized central line bundle, informed by current clinical practice and a critical appraisal of the literature, for mandatory use in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent application of a standardized central line bundle would reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study sites, enabling more accurate benefit-risk assessments of experimental therapies, particularly those requiring central venous access, in this population of infants with a high unmet medical need.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving treatments in extremely premature infants, significantly improving their survival and outcomes. CVCs, however, are known to increase the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). • Central line bundles are routinely implemented in clinical practice with demonstrable benefit in reducing CLABSI. Still, their impact often wanes as the focus and stringency on bundle components and audit programs decrease.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• We propose a standardized central line bundle for mandatory use in clinical trials. This will help reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study centers, enabling a more accurate evaluation of the benefit-risk profile of experimental therapies-especially those requiring administration via central venous catheters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"184 8\",\"pages\":\"492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276124/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06329-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06329-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Expert review of CLABSI prevention in the NICU: supporting the transition of investigational drugs into clinical practice.
Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving medications, parenteral nutrition, and fluids in extremely premature (EP; i.e., 28 weeks' gestational age) infants. Indeed, CVCs have enabled increased survival and improved outcomes in EP infants over the last several decades. However, CVCs remain a major risk factor for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), which can lead to serious complications in this vulnerable population. While many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have adopted CVC bundles to reduce CLABSI risk, implementation remains inconsistent, contributing to significant variability across centers. A minimized and reproducible baseline rate of CLABSI is important not only to physicians caring for EP infants and their families but also to clinical investigators and regulatory authorities in the evaluation of experimental therapies aimed at combating the complications of prematurity, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, and impaired neurological development. CLABSIs may confound clinical outcomes and thus impact the interpretation of trial results. We propose a standardized central line bundle, informed by current clinical practice and a critical appraisal of the literature, for mandatory use in clinical trials.
Conclusion: Consistent application of a standardized central line bundle would reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study sites, enabling more accurate benefit-risk assessments of experimental therapies, particularly those requiring central venous access, in this population of infants with a high unmet medical need.
What is known: • Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving treatments in extremely premature infants, significantly improving their survival and outcomes. CVCs, however, are known to increase the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). • Central line bundles are routinely implemented in clinical practice with demonstrable benefit in reducing CLABSI. Still, their impact often wanes as the focus and stringency on bundle components and audit programs decrease.
What is new: • We propose a standardized central line bundle for mandatory use in clinical trials. This will help reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study centers, enabling a more accurate evaluation of the benefit-risk profile of experimental therapies-especially those requiring administration via central venous catheters.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics.
EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned.
The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics.
EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate.
EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.