新生儿重症监护室预防CLABSI的专家评论:支持研究药物过渡到临床实践。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Paolo Manzoni, David A Kaufman, Victoria Niklas, Mario Giuffrè, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Daniele De Luca
{"title":"新生儿重症监护室预防CLABSI的专家评论:支持研究药物过渡到临床实践。","authors":"Paolo Manzoni, David A Kaufman, Victoria Niklas, Mario Giuffrè, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Daniele De Luca","doi":"10.1007/s00431-025-06329-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving medications, parenteral nutrition, and fluids in extremely premature (EP; i.e., 28 weeks' gestational age) infants. Indeed, CVCs have enabled increased survival and improved outcomes in EP infants over the last several decades. However, CVCs remain a major risk factor for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), which can lead to serious complications in this vulnerable population. While many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have adopted CVC bundles to reduce CLABSI risk, implementation remains inconsistent, contributing to significant variability across centers. A minimized and reproducible baseline rate of CLABSI is important not only to physicians caring for EP infants and their families but also to clinical investigators and regulatory authorities in the evaluation of experimental therapies aimed at combating the complications of prematurity, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, and impaired neurological development. CLABSIs may confound clinical outcomes and thus impact the interpretation of trial results. We propose a standardized central line bundle, informed by current clinical practice and a critical appraisal of the literature, for mandatory use in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent application of a standardized central line bundle would reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study sites, enabling more accurate benefit-risk assessments of experimental therapies, particularly those requiring central venous access, in this population of infants with a high unmet medical need.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving treatments in extremely premature infants, significantly improving their survival and outcomes. CVCs, however, are known to increase the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). • Central line bundles are routinely implemented in clinical practice with demonstrable benefit in reducing CLABSI. Still, their impact often wanes as the focus and stringency on bundle components and audit programs decrease.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• We propose a standardized central line bundle for mandatory use in clinical trials. This will help reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study centers, enabling a more accurate evaluation of the benefit-risk profile of experimental therapies-especially those requiring administration via central venous catheters.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"184 8","pages":"492"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert review of CLABSI prevention in the NICU: supporting the transition of investigational drugs into clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Manzoni, David A Kaufman, Victoria Niklas, Mario Giuffrè, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet, Daniele De Luca\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00431-025-06329-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving medications, parenteral nutrition, and fluids in extremely premature (EP; i.e., 28 weeks' gestational age) infants. Indeed, CVCs have enabled increased survival and improved outcomes in EP infants over the last several decades. However, CVCs remain a major risk factor for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), which can lead to serious complications in this vulnerable population. While many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have adopted CVC bundles to reduce CLABSI risk, implementation remains inconsistent, contributing to significant variability across centers. A minimized and reproducible baseline rate of CLABSI is important not only to physicians caring for EP infants and their families but also to clinical investigators and regulatory authorities in the evaluation of experimental therapies aimed at combating the complications of prematurity, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, and impaired neurological development. CLABSIs may confound clinical outcomes and thus impact the interpretation of trial results. We propose a standardized central line bundle, informed by current clinical practice and a critical appraisal of the literature, for mandatory use in clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consistent application of a standardized central line bundle would reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study sites, enabling more accurate benefit-risk assessments of experimental therapies, particularly those requiring central venous access, in this population of infants with a high unmet medical need.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving treatments in extremely premature infants, significantly improving their survival and outcomes. CVCs, however, are known to increase the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). • Central line bundles are routinely implemented in clinical practice with demonstrable benefit in reducing CLABSI. Still, their impact often wanes as the focus and stringency on bundle components and audit programs decrease.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• We propose a standardized central line bundle for mandatory use in clinical trials. This will help reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study centers, enabling a more accurate evaluation of the benefit-risk profile of experimental therapies-especially those requiring administration via central venous catheters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"184 8\",\"pages\":\"492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276124/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06329-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-025-06329-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中心静脉导管(CVCs)对于在极度早产儿(EP;即28周胎龄)婴儿。事实上,在过去的几十年里,cvc已经提高了EP婴儿的生存率并改善了预后。然而,心血管疾病仍然是中心线相关血流感染(CLABSI)的主要危险因素,这可能导致这一易感人群的严重并发症。虽然许多新生儿重症监护病房(nicu)已经采用CVC捆绑来降低CLABSI风险,但实施仍然不一致,导致各中心之间存在显著差异。最小化和可重复的CLABSI基线率不仅对照顾EP婴儿及其家庭的医生很重要,而且对临床研究者和监管当局评估旨在对抗早产并发症的实验疗法(如支气管肺发育不良、早产儿视网膜病变和神经发育受损)也很重要。CLABSIs可能混淆临床结果,从而影响对试验结果的解释。我们建议一个标准化的中心静脉束,根据当前的临床实践和对文献的批判性评估,在临床试验中强制使用。结论:标准化中心静脉束的持续应用将减少研究地点基线CLABSI率的变异性,使实验疗法的获益-风险评估更加准确,特别是那些需要中心静脉通路的治疗,在这一医疗需求未得到满足的婴儿群体中。•中心静脉导管(CVCs)对于给予极早产儿救生治疗至关重要,可显著提高其存活率和预后。然而,已知CVCs会增加中心线相关血流感染(CLABSI)的风险。•在临床实践中,中央静脉束在减少CLABSI方面具有明显的益处。尽管如此,随着对捆绑组件和审计程序的关注和严格程度的降低,它们的影响往往会减弱。新内容:•我们建议在临床试验中强制使用标准化的中央静脉束。这将有助于减少各研究中心基线CLABSI率的差异,从而更准确地评估实验性治疗的获益-风险概况,特别是那些需要通过中心静脉导管给药的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert review of CLABSI prevention in the NICU: supporting the transition of investigational drugs into clinical practice.

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving medications, parenteral nutrition, and fluids in extremely premature (EP; i.e., 28 weeks' gestational age) infants. Indeed, CVCs have enabled increased survival and improved outcomes in EP infants over the last several decades. However, CVCs remain a major risk factor for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), which can lead to serious complications in this vulnerable population. While many neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) have adopted CVC bundles to reduce CLABSI risk, implementation remains inconsistent, contributing to significant variability across centers. A minimized and reproducible baseline rate of CLABSI is important not only to physicians caring for EP infants and their families but also to clinical investigators and regulatory authorities in the evaluation of experimental therapies aimed at combating the complications of prematurity, such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, and impaired neurological development. CLABSIs may confound clinical outcomes and thus impact the interpretation of trial results. We propose a standardized central line bundle, informed by current clinical practice and a critical appraisal of the literature, for mandatory use in clinical trials.

Conclusion: Consistent application of a standardized central line bundle would reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study sites, enabling more accurate benefit-risk assessments of experimental therapies, particularly those requiring central venous access, in this population of infants with a high unmet medical need.

What is known: • Central venous catheters (CVCs) are essential for administering life-saving treatments in extremely premature infants, significantly improving their survival and outcomes. CVCs, however, are known to increase the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI). • Central line bundles are routinely implemented in clinical practice with demonstrable benefit in reducing CLABSI. Still, their impact often wanes as the focus and stringency on bundle components and audit programs decrease.

What is new: • We propose a standardized central line bundle for mandatory use in clinical trials. This will help reduce variability in baseline CLABSI rates across study centers, enabling a more accurate evaluation of the benefit-risk profile of experimental therapies-especially those requiring administration via central venous catheters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信