艾滋病毒感染者非理性信念量表的开发和验证。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
LongSheng Xie, Min Tian, Wei Wei, JianLan Ren, YuBei Liu, ZhaoLan Yu, YanHua Chen
{"title":"艾滋病毒感染者非理性信念量表的开发和验证。","authors":"LongSheng Xie, Min Tian, Wei Wei, JianLan Ren, YuBei Liu, ZhaoLan Yu, YanHua Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23611-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a culturally adapted scale measuring HIV-related irrational beliefs among PLHIV in China, and to examine its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted from 05/2022 to 11/2023 with four stages. Stage 1: a pool of items was constructed through semi-structured interviews with 48 PLHIV; Stage 2: 14 multidisciplinary experts were invited to evaluate the content validity of the scale; Stage 3: the test-retest reliability of the scale was conducted with 31 PLHIV; and Stage 4: a convenience sampling was used to conduct an online and on-site survey of PLHIV in eight designated institutions of antiretroviral treatment in Luzhou and Anyue regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, a pool of 45 items was formed, with a Scale-level Content Validity Index average was 0.97 and the content validity index for each item was 0.86-1. The intra-class correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.845. After exploratory factor analysis, four factors were extracted: Self-related Irrational Beliefs (SRIBs); Disease-related Irrational Beliefs (DRIBs); Treatment-related Irrational Beliefs (TRIBs), and Privacy-related Irrational Beliefs (PRIBs), with a total of 35 items, which could explain 60.6% variance. The Cronbach's α of the Irrational Beliefs Scale of PLHIV was 0.951, and the Cronbach's α of each dimension ranged from 0.851 to 0.928.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scale could be used as a valid tool for measuring irrational beliefs among PLHIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12272983/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The development and validation of the irrational beliefs scale for people living with HIV.\",\"authors\":\"LongSheng Xie, Min Tian, Wei Wei, JianLan Ren, YuBei Liu, ZhaoLan Yu, YanHua Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-23611-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a culturally adapted scale measuring HIV-related irrational beliefs among PLHIV in China, and to examine its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted from 05/2022 to 11/2023 with four stages. Stage 1: a pool of items was constructed through semi-structured interviews with 48 PLHIV; Stage 2: 14 multidisciplinary experts were invited to evaluate the content validity of the scale; Stage 3: the test-retest reliability of the scale was conducted with 31 PLHIV; and Stage 4: a convenience sampling was used to conduct an online and on-site survey of PLHIV in eight designated institutions of antiretroviral treatment in Luzhou and Anyue regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finally, a pool of 45 items was formed, with a Scale-level Content Validity Index average was 0.97 and the content validity index for each item was 0.86-1. The intra-class correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.845. After exploratory factor analysis, four factors were extracted: Self-related Irrational Beliefs (SRIBs); Disease-related Irrational Beliefs (DRIBs); Treatment-related Irrational Beliefs (TRIBs), and Privacy-related Irrational Beliefs (PRIBs), with a total of 35 items, which could explain 60.6% variance. The Cronbach's α of the Irrational Beliefs Scale of PLHIV was 0.951, and the Cronbach's α of each dimension ranged from 0.851 to 0.928.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The scale could be used as a valid tool for measuring irrational beliefs among PLHIV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"2494\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12272983/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23611-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23611-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:编制适合中国hiv人群的hiv相关非理性信念量表,并对其心理测量特性进行检验。方法:研究于2022年5月5日至2023年11月进行,分为四个阶段。第一阶段:通过对48名hiv感染者进行半结构化访谈,构建项目库;第二阶段:邀请14位多学科专家对量表的内容效度进行评估;第三阶段:以31例PLHIV进行量表重测信度;第四阶段:采用方便抽样的方法,对泸州、安岳地区8家定点抗逆转录病毒治疗机构的PLHIV进行在线和现场调查。结果:最终形成45个题库,量表级内容效度指数平均值为0.97,各题库内容效度指数为0.86-1。重测信度的类内相关系数为0.845。经探索性因子分析,提取出四个因素:自我相关非理性信念(srib);疾病相关非理性信念(DRIBs);治疗相关非理性信念(TRIBs)和隐私相关非理性信念(PRIBs),共35个项目,可以解释60.6%的方差。PLHIV非理性信念量表的Cronbach’s α为0.951,各维度的Cronbach’s α在0.851 ~ 0.928之间。结论:该量表可作为衡量hiv患者非理性信念的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The development and validation of the irrational beliefs scale for people living with HIV.

Objective: To develop a culturally adapted scale measuring HIV-related irrational beliefs among PLHIV in China, and to examine its psychometric properties.

Methods: The study was conducted from 05/2022 to 11/2023 with four stages. Stage 1: a pool of items was constructed through semi-structured interviews with 48 PLHIV; Stage 2: 14 multidisciplinary experts were invited to evaluate the content validity of the scale; Stage 3: the test-retest reliability of the scale was conducted with 31 PLHIV; and Stage 4: a convenience sampling was used to conduct an online and on-site survey of PLHIV in eight designated institutions of antiretroviral treatment in Luzhou and Anyue regions.

Results: Finally, a pool of 45 items was formed, with a Scale-level Content Validity Index average was 0.97 and the content validity index for each item was 0.86-1. The intra-class correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.845. After exploratory factor analysis, four factors were extracted: Self-related Irrational Beliefs (SRIBs); Disease-related Irrational Beliefs (DRIBs); Treatment-related Irrational Beliefs (TRIBs), and Privacy-related Irrational Beliefs (PRIBs), with a total of 35 items, which could explain 60.6% variance. The Cronbach's α of the Irrational Beliefs Scale of PLHIV was 0.951, and the Cronbach's α of each dimension ranged from 0.851 to 0.928.

Conclusion: The scale could be used as a valid tool for measuring irrational beliefs among PLHIV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信