实施聊天机器人以促进妇女健康中的遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因筛查:确定筛查采用的障碍和促进因素。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Easton N Wollney, Shireen Madani Sims, Luisel J Ricks-Santi, Elizabeth Eddy, Daniel Wiesman, Carla L Fisher
{"title":"实施聊天机器人以促进妇女健康中的遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌基因筛查:确定筛查采用的障碍和促进因素。","authors":"Easton N Wollney, Shireen Madani Sims, Luisel J Ricks-Santi, Elizabeth Eddy, Daniel Wiesman, Carla L Fisher","doi":"10.1186/s12889-025-23488-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To promote genetic screening among women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that risk assessment be integrated into practice. Chatbots like the Genetic Information Assistant (Gia®) are increasingly implemented to expand access to hereditary genetic screening. Factors that impact chatbot implementation for HBOC risk screening and women's uptake are not fully realized. To refine implementation strategies prior to full scale implementation, we sought to identify women's perceived facilitators/barriers to adopting Gia screening in a rural population within a large healthcare system in the southern United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited both women who agreed to screen using Gia (and then recommended for genetic testing based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines) as well as women who opted not to do the screen from three Women's Health clinics (OB/GYN) in a northern rural region of Florida. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 17 women (nine adopted the screen, eight did not). We conducted a thematic analysis to identify and further define barriers/facilitators to women's uptake of Gia for HBOC cancer risk screening in obstetrics/gynecology care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women identified six factors that inhibited and/or facilitated their willingness to use Gia for screening: 1) cancer risk perception, 2) communication with their clinician, 3) feasibility of screening, 4) fiscal and insurance concerns, 5) technology trust/distrust, and 6) previous genetic testing experience. Findings illustrate how each factor functioned as a facilitator and/or barrier in women's uptake (e.g., technology being trusted for accuracy versus concerns for data privacy and security).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While chatbots can extend women's cancer risk screening access, particularly in rural regions and with college-educated women, systems-level (cost) and individual-level factors (perceived risk, misconceptions about repeating genetic testing) should be addressed to promote adoption. Women's interaction with a clinician may be a key implementation strategy for addressing these factors to personalize the screening opportunity and promote their chatbot screening adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"2516"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing a chatbot to promote hereditary breast & ovarian cancer genetic screening in women's health: identifying barriers and facilitators to screening adoption.\",\"authors\":\"Easton N Wollney, Shireen Madani Sims, Luisel J Ricks-Santi, Elizabeth Eddy, Daniel Wiesman, Carla L Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-025-23488-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To promote genetic screening among women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that risk assessment be integrated into practice. Chatbots like the Genetic Information Assistant (Gia®) are increasingly implemented to expand access to hereditary genetic screening. Factors that impact chatbot implementation for HBOC risk screening and women's uptake are not fully realized. To refine implementation strategies prior to full scale implementation, we sought to identify women's perceived facilitators/barriers to adopting Gia screening in a rural population within a large healthcare system in the southern United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited both women who agreed to screen using Gia (and then recommended for genetic testing based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines) as well as women who opted not to do the screen from three Women's Health clinics (OB/GYN) in a northern rural region of Florida. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 17 women (nine adopted the screen, eight did not). We conducted a thematic analysis to identify and further define barriers/facilitators to women's uptake of Gia for HBOC cancer risk screening in obstetrics/gynecology care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women identified six factors that inhibited and/or facilitated their willingness to use Gia for screening: 1) cancer risk perception, 2) communication with their clinician, 3) feasibility of screening, 4) fiscal and insurance concerns, 5) technology trust/distrust, and 6) previous genetic testing experience. Findings illustrate how each factor functioned as a facilitator and/or barrier in women's uptake (e.g., technology being trusted for accuracy versus concerns for data privacy and security).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While chatbots can extend women's cancer risk screening access, particularly in rural regions and with college-educated women, systems-level (cost) and individual-level factors (perceived risk, misconceptions about repeating genetic testing) should be addressed to promote adoption. Women's interaction with a clinician may be a key implementation strategy for addressing these factors to personalize the screening opportunity and promote their chatbot screening adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"2516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276685/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23488-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-23488-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了促进有遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)风险的妇女进行遗传筛查,美国妇产科医师学会建议将风险评估纳入实践。像遗传信息助理(Gia®)这样的聊天机器人越来越多地用于扩大遗传基因筛查的范围。影响聊天机器人用于HBOC风险筛查和女性接受的因素尚未完全了解。为了在全面实施之前完善实施策略,我们试图在美国南部的一个大型医疗保健系统中确定妇女在农村人口中采用Gia筛查的促进因素/障碍。方法:我们从佛罗里达州北部农村地区的三家妇女健康诊所(OB/GYN)招募了同意使用Gia进行筛查的妇女(然后根据国家综合癌症网络指南推荐进行基因检测)和选择不进行筛查的妇女。我们对17位女性进行了深入的半结构化访谈(9位采用了屏幕,8位没有)。我们进行了一项专题分析,以确定并进一步确定妇女在产科/妇科护理中使用Gia进行HBOC癌症风险筛查的障碍/促进因素。结果:女性确定了抑制和/或促进她们使用Gia进行筛查的六个因素:1)癌症风险认知,2)与临床医生的沟通,3)筛查的可行性,4)财政和保险问题,5)技术信任/不信任,6)以前的基因检测经验。调查结果说明了每个因素是如何促进和/或阻碍女性接受的(例如,信任技术的准确性与对数据隐私和安全的担忧)。结论:虽然聊天机器人可以扩大女性癌症风险筛查的机会,特别是在农村地区和受过大学教育的女性,但应该解决系统层面(成本)和个人层面的因素(感知风险,对重复基因检测的误解)以促进采用。女性与临床医生的互动可能是解决这些因素的关键实施策略,从而使筛查机会个性化,并促进她们采用聊天机器人进行筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing a chatbot to promote hereditary breast & ovarian cancer genetic screening in women's health: identifying barriers and facilitators to screening adoption.

Background: To promote genetic screening among women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that risk assessment be integrated into practice. Chatbots like the Genetic Information Assistant (Gia®) are increasingly implemented to expand access to hereditary genetic screening. Factors that impact chatbot implementation for HBOC risk screening and women's uptake are not fully realized. To refine implementation strategies prior to full scale implementation, we sought to identify women's perceived facilitators/barriers to adopting Gia screening in a rural population within a large healthcare system in the southern United States.

Methods: We recruited both women who agreed to screen using Gia (and then recommended for genetic testing based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines) as well as women who opted not to do the screen from three Women's Health clinics (OB/GYN) in a northern rural region of Florida. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 17 women (nine adopted the screen, eight did not). We conducted a thematic analysis to identify and further define barriers/facilitators to women's uptake of Gia for HBOC cancer risk screening in obstetrics/gynecology care.

Results: Women identified six factors that inhibited and/or facilitated their willingness to use Gia for screening: 1) cancer risk perception, 2) communication with their clinician, 3) feasibility of screening, 4) fiscal and insurance concerns, 5) technology trust/distrust, and 6) previous genetic testing experience. Findings illustrate how each factor functioned as a facilitator and/or barrier in women's uptake (e.g., technology being trusted for accuracy versus concerns for data privacy and security).

Conclusions: While chatbots can extend women's cancer risk screening access, particularly in rural regions and with college-educated women, systems-level (cost) and individual-level factors (perceived risk, misconceptions about repeating genetic testing) should be addressed to promote adoption. Women's interaction with a clinician may be a key implementation strategy for addressing these factors to personalize the screening opportunity and promote their chatbot screening adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信