Rachael Ashleigh Lawson, Sarah Joanna Richardson, Florence Gerakios, Alison Jane Yarnall, Gemma Bate, Laura Wright, Claire McDonald, John Paul Taylor, David Burn, Glenn Stebbins, Louise M Allan
{"title":"检测帕金森病谵妄:床边工具诊断准确性的评价。","authors":"Rachael Ashleigh Lawson, Sarah Joanna Richardson, Florence Gerakios, Alison Jane Yarnall, Gemma Bate, Laura Wright, Claire McDonald, John Paul Taylor, David Burn, Glenn Stebbins, Louise M Allan","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is a serious, acute neuropsychiatric condition associated with fluctuating attention and altered arousal. Delirium in Parkinson's disease (PD) is common but often missed in hospital due to shared clinical features. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of current tools used to identify delirium in inpatients with PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with PD admitted to all hospital wards were invited to take part. Participants completed a standardised delirium assessment based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria, in addition to standard bedside tools including the 4 As Test (4AT), arousal and cognition. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study; bedside tools were not completed independently of, or blinded to, the DSM-5 criteria. Accuracy was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic area under the curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 115 people with PD (200 hospital admissions); 66.1% (n = 76/115) had delirium. Considering all admissions, the diagnostic accuracy of tools was good, ranging from 74% to 89% (AUROC = 0.764-0.923, P < .001 for all). The 4AT scores had the highest sensitivity (96.7%, AUROC = 0.922, P < .001). However, accuracy decreased in those with underlying cognitive impairment (AUROC = 0.499-0.886).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current bedside tools can accurately identify delirium in PD inpatients. Although tools were comparable, the 4AT may have greater clinical utility as it had high sensitivity, is quicker to complete and already widely used clinical. However, caution is recommended as tools did not differentiate between symptoms typical in PD and acute symptoms associated with delirium; this should be a focus for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"54 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting delirium in Parkinson's disease: an evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of bedside tools.\",\"authors\":\"Rachael Ashleigh Lawson, Sarah Joanna Richardson, Florence Gerakios, Alison Jane Yarnall, Gemma Bate, Laura Wright, Claire McDonald, John Paul Taylor, David Burn, Glenn Stebbins, Louise M Allan\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ageing/afaf197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is a serious, acute neuropsychiatric condition associated with fluctuating attention and altered arousal. Delirium in Parkinson's disease (PD) is common but often missed in hospital due to shared clinical features. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of current tools used to identify delirium in inpatients with PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>People with PD admitted to all hospital wards were invited to take part. Participants completed a standardised delirium assessment based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria, in addition to standard bedside tools including the 4 As Test (4AT), arousal and cognition. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study; bedside tools were not completed independently of, or blinded to, the DSM-5 criteria. Accuracy was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic area under the curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants included 115 people with PD (200 hospital admissions); 66.1% (n = 76/115) had delirium. Considering all admissions, the diagnostic accuracy of tools was good, ranging from 74% to 89% (AUROC = 0.764-0.923, P < .001 for all). The 4AT scores had the highest sensitivity (96.7%, AUROC = 0.922, P < .001). However, accuracy decreased in those with underlying cognitive impairment (AUROC = 0.499-0.886).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current bedside tools can accurately identify delirium in PD inpatients. Although tools were comparable, the 4AT may have greater clinical utility as it had high sensitivity, is quicker to complete and already widely used clinical. However, caution is recommended as tools did not differentiate between symptoms typical in PD and acute symptoms associated with delirium; this should be a focus for future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Age and ageing\",\"volume\":\"54 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12276198/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Age and ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf197\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf197","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:谵妄是一种严重的急性神经精神疾病,与注意力波动和觉醒改变有关。谵妄在帕金森病(PD)是常见的,但往往错过了医院由于共同的临床特征。本研究旨在评估目前用于识别住院PD患者谵妄的工具的准确性。方法:邀请所有医院病房的PD患者参与研究。参与者完成了基于精神障碍诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM-5)标准的标准化谵妄评估,以及标准的床边工具,包括4 a测试(4AT)、觉醒和认知。这是一项前瞻性观察性研究的二次分析;床边工具不是独立完成的,也不是盲法完成的,DSM-5标准。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估准确度。结果:参与者包括115名PD患者(200名住院患者);66.1% (n = 76/115)出现谵妄。考虑到所有入院患者,工具的诊断准确性较好,范围为74%至89% (AUROC = 0.764-0.923, P < 0.001)。4AT评分的敏感性最高(96.7%,AUROC = 0.922, P < 0.001)。然而,在有潜在认知障碍的患者中,准确率下降(AUROC = 0.499-0.886)。结论:目前的床边工具可以准确识别PD住院患者的谵妄。虽然这些工具具有可比性,但4AT可能具有更大的临床实用性,因为它具有高灵敏度,更快完成并且已经广泛应用于临床。然而,建议谨慎,因为工具不能区分PD的典型症状和谵妄相关的急性症状;这应该是未来研究的重点。
Detecting delirium in Parkinson's disease: an evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of bedside tools.
Background: Delirium is a serious, acute neuropsychiatric condition associated with fluctuating attention and altered arousal. Delirium in Parkinson's disease (PD) is common but often missed in hospital due to shared clinical features. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of current tools used to identify delirium in inpatients with PD.
Methods: People with PD admitted to all hospital wards were invited to take part. Participants completed a standardised delirium assessment based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria, in addition to standard bedside tools including the 4 As Test (4AT), arousal and cognition. This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study; bedside tools were not completed independently of, or blinded to, the DSM-5 criteria. Accuracy was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic area under the curve (AUROC).
Results: Participants included 115 people with PD (200 hospital admissions); 66.1% (n = 76/115) had delirium. Considering all admissions, the diagnostic accuracy of tools was good, ranging from 74% to 89% (AUROC = 0.764-0.923, P < .001 for all). The 4AT scores had the highest sensitivity (96.7%, AUROC = 0.922, P < .001). However, accuracy decreased in those with underlying cognitive impairment (AUROC = 0.499-0.886).
Conclusions: Current bedside tools can accurately identify delirium in PD inpatients. Although tools were comparable, the 4AT may have greater clinical utility as it had high sensitivity, is quicker to complete and already widely used clinical. However, caution is recommended as tools did not differentiate between symptoms typical in PD and acute symptoms associated with delirium; this should be a focus for future research.
期刊介绍:
Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.