Romina Gollan, Patrick J. Owen, Jamie L. Tait, Luana C. Main
{"title":"急性和慢性背痛的健康、炎症和身体活动:22,864名英国生物银行参与者的横断面分析","authors":"Romina Gollan, Patrick J. Owen, Jamie L. Tait, Luana C. Main","doi":"10.1002/ejp.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Back pain is influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors, yet is often investigated separately.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Cross-sectional analysis of the UK Biobank comparing well-being (Patient Health Questionnaire-4; 4–16 points; higher scores indicate greater levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms), number of stressful life events, C-reactive protein (CRP), and physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) among pain-free, acute, and chronic back pain individuals. The sample included 22,864 individuals: 5716 with acute back pain, 5716 with chronic back pain, and 11,432 pain-free controls. Group comparisons were performed using network analysis and analysis of covariance, adjusted for socioeconomic deprivation, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol consumption.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Well-being was poorer in acute (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.20 [0.14, 0.25] points; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and chronic back pain (0.39 [0.34, 0.45] points; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to controls. More stressful life events were measured in acute (0.03 [0.01, 0.05] points; <i>p</i> = 0.041) and chronic back pain (0.03 [0.01, 0.05] points; <i>p</i> = 0.028) compared to controls. However, this finding was not robust to sensitivity analyses. Elevated CRP was found in acute (2.28 [0.57, 3.99]%; <i>p</i> = 0.024; ES = very small), but not in chronic back pain, compared to controls. No significant group differences were observed for physical activity. Network structures did not differ between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Differences in well-being and CRP among pain-free, acute, and chronic back pain individuals were identified, suggesting that variables may be affected by back pain temporality. Further prospective research incorporating additional variables is needed to explore the drivers of back pain.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\n \n <p>Individuals with acute back pain showed 2% higher CRP than controls, though values remained within the normal range (< 5 mg/L) across groups and below clinical relevance, suggesting limited utility of CRP in distinguishing acute from chronic back pain. Poorer well-being in both acute and chronic back pain underscores the need to explore underlying causal pathways. Moreover, similar network structures among groups indicate no neuroimmune involvement in back pain onset or chronification based on the variables examined.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12021,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pain","volume":"29 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.70079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Well-Being, Inflammation, and Physical Activity in Acute and Chronic Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 22,864 UK Biobank Participants\",\"authors\":\"Romina Gollan, Patrick J. Owen, Jamie L. Tait, Luana C. Main\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejp.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Back pain is influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors, yet is often investigated separately.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Cross-sectional analysis of the UK Biobank comparing well-being (Patient Health Questionnaire-4; 4–16 points; higher scores indicate greater levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms), number of stressful life events, C-reactive protein (CRP), and physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) among pain-free, acute, and chronic back pain individuals. The sample included 22,864 individuals: 5716 with acute back pain, 5716 with chronic back pain, and 11,432 pain-free controls. Group comparisons were performed using network analysis and analysis of covariance, adjusted for socioeconomic deprivation, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol consumption.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Well-being was poorer in acute (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.20 [0.14, 0.25] points; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and chronic back pain (0.39 [0.34, 0.45] points; <i>p</i> < 0.001) compared to controls. More stressful life events were measured in acute (0.03 [0.01, 0.05] points; <i>p</i> = 0.041) and chronic back pain (0.03 [0.01, 0.05] points; <i>p</i> = 0.028) compared to controls. However, this finding was not robust to sensitivity analyses. Elevated CRP was found in acute (2.28 [0.57, 3.99]%; <i>p</i> = 0.024; ES = very small), but not in chronic back pain, compared to controls. No significant group differences were observed for physical activity. Network structures did not differ between groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Differences in well-being and CRP among pain-free, acute, and chronic back pain individuals were identified, suggesting that variables may be affected by back pain temporality. Further prospective research incorporating additional variables is needed to explore the drivers of back pain.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Significance Statement</h3>\\n \\n <p>Individuals with acute back pain showed 2% higher CRP than controls, though values remained within the normal range (< 5 mg/L) across groups and below clinical relevance, suggesting limited utility of CRP in distinguishing acute from chronic back pain. Poorer well-being in both acute and chronic back pain underscores the need to explore underlying causal pathways. Moreover, similar network structures among groups indicate no neuroimmune involvement in back pain onset or chronification based on the variables examined.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"29 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejp.70079\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejp.70079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Well-Being, Inflammation, and Physical Activity in Acute and Chronic Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 22,864 UK Biobank Participants
Background
Back pain is influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors, yet is often investigated separately.
Methods
Cross-sectional analysis of the UK Biobank comparing well-being (Patient Health Questionnaire-4; 4–16 points; higher scores indicate greater levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms), number of stressful life events, C-reactive protein (CRP), and physical activity (International Physical Activity Questionnaire) among pain-free, acute, and chronic back pain individuals. The sample included 22,864 individuals: 5716 with acute back pain, 5716 with chronic back pain, and 11,432 pain-free controls. Group comparisons were performed using network analysis and analysis of covariance, adjusted for socioeconomic deprivation, body mass index, smoking, and alcohol consumption.
Results
Well-being was poorer in acute (mean difference [95% CI]: 0.20 [0.14, 0.25] points; p < 0.001) and chronic back pain (0.39 [0.34, 0.45] points; p < 0.001) compared to controls. More stressful life events were measured in acute (0.03 [0.01, 0.05] points; p = 0.041) and chronic back pain (0.03 [0.01, 0.05] points; p = 0.028) compared to controls. However, this finding was not robust to sensitivity analyses. Elevated CRP was found in acute (2.28 [0.57, 3.99]%; p = 0.024; ES = very small), but not in chronic back pain, compared to controls. No significant group differences were observed for physical activity. Network structures did not differ between groups.
Conclusions
Differences in well-being and CRP among pain-free, acute, and chronic back pain individuals were identified, suggesting that variables may be affected by back pain temporality. Further prospective research incorporating additional variables is needed to explore the drivers of back pain.
Significance Statement
Individuals with acute back pain showed 2% higher CRP than controls, though values remained within the normal range (< 5 mg/L) across groups and below clinical relevance, suggesting limited utility of CRP in distinguishing acute from chronic back pain. Poorer well-being in both acute and chronic back pain underscores the need to explore underlying causal pathways. Moreover, similar network structures among groups indicate no neuroimmune involvement in back pain onset or chronification based on the variables examined.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Pain (EJP) publishes clinical and basic science research papers relevant to all aspects of pain and its management, including specialties such as anaesthesia, dentistry, neurology and neurosurgery, orthopaedics, palliative care, pharmacology, physiology, psychiatry, psychology and rehabilitation; socio-economic aspects of pain are also covered.
Regular sections in the journal are as follows:
• Editorials and Commentaries
• Position Papers and Guidelines
• Reviews
• Original Articles
• Letters
• Bookshelf
The journal particularly welcomes clinical trials, which are published on an occasional basis.
Research articles are published under the following subject headings:
• Neurobiology
• Neurology
• Experimental Pharmacology
• Clinical Pharmacology
• Psychology
• Behavioural Therapy
• Epidemiology
• Cancer Pain
• Acute Pain
• Clinical Trials.