{"title":"第六章够了吗?公交网络重新设计公平性分析综述","authors":"Minyu Situ, Alex Karner","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Since the mid-2010s, an increasing number of transit agencies have undertaken bus network redesigns (BNRs) to better align service with rider needs. BNRs entail major equity impacts but existing approaches to assessing those impacts often fall short in various ways. This study reviews 45 BNRs across 40 agencies and produces a normative four-level analytical framework for analyzing their equity impacts. We argue that BNR equity analyses should clearly define target populations, impacts assessed, and the rules used to make equity determinations. Current equity analyses often rely on census data and proximity-based metrics, which overlook the lived experiences and barriers faced by older adults, people with disabilities, and caregivers. We recommend incorporating rider-based sources, such as on-board surveys, and integrating community feedback to capture who benefits from or is burdened by service changes. We advocate for combining systemwide and route-level evaluations to reveal more granular equity impacts and support responsive design changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104905"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Title VI enough? A review of bus network redesign equity analyses\",\"authors\":\"Minyu Situ, Alex Karner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Since the mid-2010s, an increasing number of transit agencies have undertaken bus network redesigns (BNRs) to better align service with rider needs. BNRs entail major equity impacts but existing approaches to assessing those impacts often fall short in various ways. This study reviews 45 BNRs across 40 agencies and produces a normative four-level analytical framework for analyzing their equity impacts. We argue that BNR equity analyses should clearly define target populations, impacts assessed, and the rules used to make equity determinations. Current equity analyses often rely on census data and proximity-based metrics, which overlook the lived experiences and barriers faced by older adults, people with disabilities, and caregivers. We recommend incorporating rider-based sources, such as on-board surveys, and integrating community feedback to capture who benefits from or is burdened by service changes. We advocate for combining systemwide and route-level evaluations to reveal more granular equity impacts and support responsive design changes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104905\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003153\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is Title VI enough? A review of bus network redesign equity analyses
Since the mid-2010s, an increasing number of transit agencies have undertaken bus network redesigns (BNRs) to better align service with rider needs. BNRs entail major equity impacts but existing approaches to assessing those impacts often fall short in various ways. This study reviews 45 BNRs across 40 agencies and produces a normative four-level analytical framework for analyzing their equity impacts. We argue that BNR equity analyses should clearly define target populations, impacts assessed, and the rules used to make equity determinations. Current equity analyses often rely on census data and proximity-based metrics, which overlook the lived experiences and barriers faced by older adults, people with disabilities, and caregivers. We recommend incorporating rider-based sources, such as on-board surveys, and integrating community feedback to capture who benefits from or is burdened by service changes. We advocate for combining systemwide and route-level evaluations to reveal more granular equity impacts and support responsive design changes.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.