寻求自然的心理:消费者食物选择中自然偏见的认知基础

Lorenzo Gagliardi
{"title":"寻求自然的心理:消费者食物选择中自然偏见的认知基础","authors":"Lorenzo Gagliardi","doi":"10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Naturalness bias refers to a tendency to favor products that are perceived as natural over synthetic or industrial goods. This bias has been observed in various product categories, including drugs, food and cosmetics. Although previous research has primarily focused on identifying the different motives underlying this preference, there is limited understanding of the cognitive foundations of this bias which remains undertheorized. The present paper seeks to address this gap by theoretically framing the phenomenon in terms of a by-product of the representativeness heuristic, which involves estimating the likelihood that an object belongs to a category based on its similarity to a pre-existing prototype. In this context, judging the naturalness of a product entails comparing it to a set of stereotyped attributes of “naturalness”. Among these, this paper discusses the role of aesthetic randomness and unusual colors/shapes as possible cues of naturalness, with a specific focus on the role of cosmetic imperfections and abnormalities. A better theoretical understanding of how naturalness bias develops may have practical implications for developing consumer education campaigns and mitigating food waste.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100543,"journal":{"name":"Food and Humanity","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100716"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Naturalness seeking minds: The cognitive foundations of naturalness bias in consumer food choice\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Gagliardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Naturalness bias refers to a tendency to favor products that are perceived as natural over synthetic or industrial goods. This bias has been observed in various product categories, including drugs, food and cosmetics. Although previous research has primarily focused on identifying the different motives underlying this preference, there is limited understanding of the cognitive foundations of this bias which remains undertheorized. The present paper seeks to address this gap by theoretically framing the phenomenon in terms of a by-product of the representativeness heuristic, which involves estimating the likelihood that an object belongs to a category based on its similarity to a pre-existing prototype. In this context, judging the naturalness of a product entails comparing it to a set of stereotyped attributes of “naturalness”. Among these, this paper discusses the role of aesthetic randomness and unusual colors/shapes as possible cues of naturalness, with a specific focus on the role of cosmetic imperfections and abnormalities. A better theoretical understanding of how naturalness bias develops may have practical implications for developing consumer education campaigns and mitigating food waste.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100543,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Humanity\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Humanity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949824425002204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Humanity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949824425002204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自然偏见指的是一种倾向,倾向于认为是天然的产品,而不是合成或工业产品。在包括药品、食品和化妆品在内的各种产品类别中都观察到这种偏见。尽管先前的研究主要集中在确定这种偏好背后的不同动机,但对这种偏见的认知基础的理解有限,这仍然是理论化不足的。本文试图通过代表性启发式的副产品从理论上构建这一现象来解决这一差距,代表性启发式涉及根据其与预先存在的原型的相似性估计对象属于类别的可能性。在这种情况下,判断产品的自然性需要将其与一组定型的“自然性”属性进行比较。其中,本文讨论了审美随机性和不寻常的颜色/形状作为自然的可能线索的作用,特别关注化妆品缺陷和异常的作用。从理论上更好地理解自然偏差是如何发展的,可能对开展消费者教育活动和减少食物浪费具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Naturalness seeking minds: The cognitive foundations of naturalness bias in consumer food choice
Naturalness bias refers to a tendency to favor products that are perceived as natural over synthetic or industrial goods. This bias has been observed in various product categories, including drugs, food and cosmetics. Although previous research has primarily focused on identifying the different motives underlying this preference, there is limited understanding of the cognitive foundations of this bias which remains undertheorized. The present paper seeks to address this gap by theoretically framing the phenomenon in terms of a by-product of the representativeness heuristic, which involves estimating the likelihood that an object belongs to a category based on its similarity to a pre-existing prototype. In this context, judging the naturalness of a product entails comparing it to a set of stereotyped attributes of “naturalness”. Among these, this paper discusses the role of aesthetic randomness and unusual colors/shapes as possible cues of naturalness, with a specific focus on the role of cosmetic imperfections and abnormalities. A better theoretical understanding of how naturalness bias develops may have practical implications for developing consumer education campaigns and mitigating food waste.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信