Michał Nosek , Katarzyna Gawrońska , Piotr Rozpądek , Karolina Chmura , Andrzej Kornaś
{"title":"兼性CAM植物盐度胁迫恢复过程中RubisCO和PEPC的差异表达","authors":"Michał Nosek , Katarzyna Gawrońska , Piotr Rozpądek , Karolina Chmura , Andrzej Kornaś","doi":"10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Our previous work demonstrated that the model facultative CAM plant (<em>Mesembryanthemum crystallinum</em> L.) requires less than 48 h to fully rearrange its photosynthetic apparatus and complete recovery of photosynthetic quantum efficiency following salinity stress withdrawal. Our latest findings show that not all aspects of this highly plastic photosynthetic apparatus undergo such rapid changes. Although significantly lower than in salinity-sustained (+NaCl) plants, the stress-dependent PEPC1 protein remained expressed in salinity stress-withdrawn (-NaCl) plants for two consecutive days after stress removal, whereas its expression was undetectable in control (C3) plants. Limited PEPC activity in salinity-withdrawn plants was reflected in a significantly higher <sup>13</sup>C discrimination than in salinity-sustained (+NaCl) plants. Interestingly, changes in RubisCO expression at the protein level did not appear to be part of the rapid modifications following stress withdrawal. For two consecutive days after stress removal, the large RubisCO subunit remained expressed at similar levels in both salinity-stressed (+NaCl) and stress-withdrawn (-NaCl) plants, while being significantly lower than in unstressed (C3) control plants. On the other hand, one day after stress withdrawal (-NaCl), proline levels dropped to those observed in salinity-untreated (C3) control plants. Conversely, stressor removal had only a minor impact on oxidative stress-related damage in recovering plants. Moreover, withdrawing osmotic stress had little effect on the growth rate. Despite a significantly higher relative water content (RWC) in stress-withdrawn (-NaCl) plants compared to those that remained under salinity stress (+NaCl), growth did not noticeably accelerate. Overall, this study provides new insights into the recovery process from salinity stress.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20234,"journal":{"name":"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 110272"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential expression of RubisCO and PEPC during the salinity stress recovery of facultative CAM plants\",\"authors\":\"Michał Nosek , Katarzyna Gawrońska , Piotr Rozpądek , Karolina Chmura , Andrzej Kornaś\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Our previous work demonstrated that the model facultative CAM plant (<em>Mesembryanthemum crystallinum</em> L.) requires less than 48 h to fully rearrange its photosynthetic apparatus and complete recovery of photosynthetic quantum efficiency following salinity stress withdrawal. Our latest findings show that not all aspects of this highly plastic photosynthetic apparatus undergo such rapid changes. Although significantly lower than in salinity-sustained (+NaCl) plants, the stress-dependent PEPC1 protein remained expressed in salinity stress-withdrawn (-NaCl) plants for two consecutive days after stress removal, whereas its expression was undetectable in control (C3) plants. Limited PEPC activity in salinity-withdrawn plants was reflected in a significantly higher <sup>13</sup>C discrimination than in salinity-sustained (+NaCl) plants. Interestingly, changes in RubisCO expression at the protein level did not appear to be part of the rapid modifications following stress withdrawal. For two consecutive days after stress removal, the large RubisCO subunit remained expressed at similar levels in both salinity-stressed (+NaCl) and stress-withdrawn (-NaCl) plants, while being significantly lower than in unstressed (C3) control plants. On the other hand, one day after stress withdrawal (-NaCl), proline levels dropped to those observed in salinity-untreated (C3) control plants. Conversely, stressor removal had only a minor impact on oxidative stress-related damage in recovering plants. Moreover, withdrawing osmotic stress had little effect on the growth rate. Despite a significantly higher relative water content (RWC) in stress-withdrawn (-NaCl) plants compared to those that remained under salinity stress (+NaCl), growth did not noticeably accelerate. Overall, this study provides new insights into the recovery process from salinity stress.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0981942825008009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Physiology and Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0981942825008009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differential expression of RubisCO and PEPC during the salinity stress recovery of facultative CAM plants
Our previous work demonstrated that the model facultative CAM plant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L.) requires less than 48 h to fully rearrange its photosynthetic apparatus and complete recovery of photosynthetic quantum efficiency following salinity stress withdrawal. Our latest findings show that not all aspects of this highly plastic photosynthetic apparatus undergo such rapid changes. Although significantly lower than in salinity-sustained (+NaCl) plants, the stress-dependent PEPC1 protein remained expressed in salinity stress-withdrawn (-NaCl) plants for two consecutive days after stress removal, whereas its expression was undetectable in control (C3) plants. Limited PEPC activity in salinity-withdrawn plants was reflected in a significantly higher 13C discrimination than in salinity-sustained (+NaCl) plants. Interestingly, changes in RubisCO expression at the protein level did not appear to be part of the rapid modifications following stress withdrawal. For two consecutive days after stress removal, the large RubisCO subunit remained expressed at similar levels in both salinity-stressed (+NaCl) and stress-withdrawn (-NaCl) plants, while being significantly lower than in unstressed (C3) control plants. On the other hand, one day after stress withdrawal (-NaCl), proline levels dropped to those observed in salinity-untreated (C3) control plants. Conversely, stressor removal had only a minor impact on oxidative stress-related damage in recovering plants. Moreover, withdrawing osmotic stress had little effect on the growth rate. Despite a significantly higher relative water content (RWC) in stress-withdrawn (-NaCl) plants compared to those that remained under salinity stress (+NaCl), growth did not noticeably accelerate. Overall, this study provides new insights into the recovery process from salinity stress.
期刊介绍:
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry publishes original theoretical, experimental and technical contributions in the various fields of plant physiology (biochemistry, physiology, structure, genetics, plant-microbe interactions, etc.) at diverse levels of integration (molecular, subcellular, cellular, organ, whole plant, environmental). Opinions expressed in the journal are the sole responsibility of the authors and publication does not imply the editors'' agreement.
Manuscripts describing molecular-genetic and/or gene expression data that are not integrated with biochemical analysis and/or actual measurements of plant physiological processes are not suitable for PPB. Also "Omics" studies (transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, etc.) reporting descriptive analysis without an element of functional validation assays, will not be considered. Similarly, applied agronomic or phytochemical studies that generate no new, fundamental insights in plant physiological and/or biochemical processes are not suitable for publication in PPB.
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry publishes several types of articles: Reviews, Papers and Short Papers. Articles for Reviews are either invited by the editor or proposed by the authors for the editor''s prior agreement. Reviews should not exceed 40 typewritten pages and Short Papers no more than approximately 8 typewritten pages. The fundamental character of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry remains that of a journal for original results.