滑坡跳动距离的数据集和经验估计关系综述

IF 10 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Weibing Gong , Guangshuai Wang , Lin Li , Boneng Chen
{"title":"滑坡跳动距离的数据集和经验估计关系综述","authors":"Weibing Gong ,&nbsp;Guangshuai Wang ,&nbsp;Lin Li ,&nbsp;Boneng Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Estimating landslide runout distances is crucial for assessing their potential impacts on surrounding infrastructure and communities. By comparing estimated runout distances with the proximity of landslides to vulnerable sites, the likelihood of landslide impact can be assessed, and the volume of debris that may reach such locations can be indirectly quantified. This paper presents a comprehensive review of 28 empirical relationships developed to estimate landslide runout distances associated with various triggering factors, including earthquakes, rainfall, and other factors, while also accounting for different material types such as soil, rock, and soil-rock mixtures. The relationships are analyzed in terms of equation formats, adopted parameters, and the number of parameters involved, identifying volume and height as the most frequently used variables and mixed equation formats (e.g., logarithmic and linear combinations) as the most common. Existing definitions of runout distance are reviewed, and this study adopts the definition as the horizontal distance between the upper point of the landslide source and the lowest point of deposition, chosen for its clarity and ease of measurement from mapped landslide inventories. To validate the summarized relationships, a dataset comprising 22,456 landslides was established. The analysis revealed low <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> values for many existing empirical relationships, highlighting the necessity for developing improved empirical relationships. This study develops new empirical estimation relationships tailored to different triggering factors and material types, enhancing estimation accuracy of landslide runout distances. The finalized empirical relationships are offered and aim to serve as practical tools for the rapid estimation of landslide runout distances, thereby supporting effective disaster response and mitigation strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"270 ","pages":"Article 105225"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A dataset and review of empirical estimation relationships for landslide runout distances\",\"authors\":\"Weibing Gong ,&nbsp;Guangshuai Wang ,&nbsp;Lin Li ,&nbsp;Boneng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Estimating landslide runout distances is crucial for assessing their potential impacts on surrounding infrastructure and communities. By comparing estimated runout distances with the proximity of landslides to vulnerable sites, the likelihood of landslide impact can be assessed, and the volume of debris that may reach such locations can be indirectly quantified. This paper presents a comprehensive review of 28 empirical relationships developed to estimate landslide runout distances associated with various triggering factors, including earthquakes, rainfall, and other factors, while also accounting for different material types such as soil, rock, and soil-rock mixtures. The relationships are analyzed in terms of equation formats, adopted parameters, and the number of parameters involved, identifying volume and height as the most frequently used variables and mixed equation formats (e.g., logarithmic and linear combinations) as the most common. Existing definitions of runout distance are reviewed, and this study adopts the definition as the horizontal distance between the upper point of the landslide source and the lowest point of deposition, chosen for its clarity and ease of measurement from mapped landslide inventories. To validate the summarized relationships, a dataset comprising 22,456 landslides was established. The analysis revealed low <em>R</em><sup>2</sup> values for many existing empirical relationships, highlighting the necessity for developing improved empirical relationships. This study develops new empirical estimation relationships tailored to different triggering factors and material types, enhancing estimation accuracy of landslide runout distances. The finalized empirical relationships are offered and aim to serve as practical tools for the rapid estimation of landslide runout distances, thereby supporting effective disaster response and mitigation strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"volume\":\"270 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105225\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth-Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825225001862\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825225001862","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

估计滑坡爆发距离对于评估其对周围基础设施和社区的潜在影响至关重要。通过比较估计的爆发距离和滑坡离脆弱地点的距离,可以评估滑坡影响的可能性,并且可以间接量化可能到达这些地点的碎片的体积。本文全面回顾了28种经验关系,这些关系用于估计与各种触发因素(包括地震、降雨和其他因素)相关的滑坡跳跃距离,同时也考虑了不同的材料类型(如土壤、岩石和土石混合物)。从方程格式、采用的参数、涉及的参数数量等方面分析了它们之间的关系,其中体积和高度是最常用的变量,混合方程格式(如对数和线性组合)是最常见的。对跳动距离的现有定义进行了回顾,本研究采用跳动距离的定义作为起始点与沉积最低点之间的水平距离,选择跳动距离的原因是它的清晰度和易于从绘制的滑坡清单中测量。为了验证总结的关系,建立了一个包含22,456个滑坡的数据集。分析显示,许多现有经验关系的R2值较低,强调了发展改进经验关系的必要性。针对不同的触发因素和物质类型,建立了新的经验估计关系,提高了滑坡跳动距离的估计精度。最后给出了经验关系,其目的是作为快速估计滑坡爆发距离的实用工具,从而支持有效的灾害反应和减灾战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A dataset and review of empirical estimation relationships for landslide runout distances
Estimating landslide runout distances is crucial for assessing their potential impacts on surrounding infrastructure and communities. By comparing estimated runout distances with the proximity of landslides to vulnerable sites, the likelihood of landslide impact can be assessed, and the volume of debris that may reach such locations can be indirectly quantified. This paper presents a comprehensive review of 28 empirical relationships developed to estimate landslide runout distances associated with various triggering factors, including earthquakes, rainfall, and other factors, while also accounting for different material types such as soil, rock, and soil-rock mixtures. The relationships are analyzed in terms of equation formats, adopted parameters, and the number of parameters involved, identifying volume and height as the most frequently used variables and mixed equation formats (e.g., logarithmic and linear combinations) as the most common. Existing definitions of runout distance are reviewed, and this study adopts the definition as the horizontal distance between the upper point of the landslide source and the lowest point of deposition, chosen for its clarity and ease of measurement from mapped landslide inventories. To validate the summarized relationships, a dataset comprising 22,456 landslides was established. The analysis revealed low R2 values for many existing empirical relationships, highlighting the necessity for developing improved empirical relationships. This study develops new empirical estimation relationships tailored to different triggering factors and material types, enhancing estimation accuracy of landslide runout distances. The finalized empirical relationships are offered and aim to serve as practical tools for the rapid estimation of landslide runout distances, thereby supporting effective disaster response and mitigation strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信