重新定义道德和社会厌恶(“黑暗”)的人格特征

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Morten Moshagen , Benjamin E. Hilbig , Ingo Zettler
{"title":"重新定义道德和社会厌恶(“黑暗”)的人格特征","authors":"Morten Moshagen ,&nbsp;Benjamin E. Hilbig ,&nbsp;Ingo Zettler","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many ethically and socially aversive (“dark”) traits have been proposed to account for corresponding behaviors. Despite their popularity and success in predicting relevant outcomes, research on aversive traits is beset both by conceptual overlap between traits assigned different labels and by heterogenous conceptualizations of traits assigned the same label. This not only implies a lack of distinctiveness, but also a lack of consistency and specificity concerning relations to outcomes. As a remedy, any aversive trait can be conceived as the conjuncture of (a) the aversive essence shared across all aversive traits and (b) an essentially non-aversive unique part. Beyond tackling the identified issues, this approach avails several additional benefits, including increased parsimony while maintaining or increasing predictive power.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102111"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualizing ethically and socially aversive (“dark”) personality traits\",\"authors\":\"Morten Moshagen ,&nbsp;Benjamin E. Hilbig ,&nbsp;Ingo Zettler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many ethically and socially aversive (“dark”) traits have been proposed to account for corresponding behaviors. Despite their popularity and success in predicting relevant outcomes, research on aversive traits is beset both by conceptual overlap between traits assigned different labels and by heterogenous conceptualizations of traits assigned the same label. This not only implies a lack of distinctiveness, but also a lack of consistency and specificity concerning relations to outcomes. As a remedy, any aversive trait can be conceived as the conjuncture of (a) the aversive essence shared across all aversive traits and (b) an essentially non-aversive unique part. Beyond tackling the identified issues, this approach avails several additional benefits, including increased parsimony while maintaining or increasing predictive power.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001241\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们提出了许多道德和社会厌恶(“黑暗”)的特征来解释相应的行为。尽管厌恶特质在预测相关结果方面很受欢迎并取得了成功,但对厌恶特质的研究受到不同标签特质之间概念重叠和相同标签特质概念异质化的困扰。这不仅意味着缺乏独特性,而且还意味着与结果的关系缺乏一致性和特异性。作为补救措施,任何厌恶特质都可以被认为是(a)所有厌恶特质共有的厌恶本质和(b)本质上非厌恶的独特部分的结合。除了解决已确定的问题之外,这种方法还提供了一些额外的好处,包括在保持或提高预测能力的同时增加了成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconceptualizing ethically and socially aversive (“dark”) personality traits
Many ethically and socially aversive (“dark”) traits have been proposed to account for corresponding behaviors. Despite their popularity and success in predicting relevant outcomes, research on aversive traits is beset both by conceptual overlap between traits assigned different labels and by heterogenous conceptualizations of traits assigned the same label. This not only implies a lack of distinctiveness, but also a lack of consistency and specificity concerning relations to outcomes. As a remedy, any aversive trait can be conceived as the conjuncture of (a) the aversive essence shared across all aversive traits and (b) an essentially non-aversive unique part. Beyond tackling the identified issues, this approach avails several additional benefits, including increased parsimony while maintaining or increasing predictive power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信