Morten Moshagen , Benjamin E. Hilbig , Ingo Zettler
{"title":"重新定义道德和社会厌恶(“黑暗”)的人格特征","authors":"Morten Moshagen , Benjamin E. Hilbig , Ingo Zettler","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many ethically and socially aversive (“dark”) traits have been proposed to account for corresponding behaviors. Despite their popularity and success in predicting relevant outcomes, research on aversive traits is beset both by conceptual overlap between traits assigned different labels and by heterogenous conceptualizations of traits assigned the same label. This not only implies a lack of distinctiveness, but also a lack of consistency and specificity concerning relations to outcomes. As a remedy, any aversive trait can be conceived as the conjuncture of (a) the aversive essence shared across all aversive traits and (b) an essentially non-aversive unique part. Beyond tackling the identified issues, this approach avails several additional benefits, including increased parsimony while maintaining or increasing predictive power.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 102111"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconceptualizing ethically and socially aversive (“dark”) personality traits\",\"authors\":\"Morten Moshagen , Benjamin E. Hilbig , Ingo Zettler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Many ethically and socially aversive (“dark”) traits have been proposed to account for corresponding behaviors. Despite their popularity and success in predicting relevant outcomes, research on aversive traits is beset both by conceptual overlap between traits assigned different labels and by heterogenous conceptualizations of traits assigned the same label. This not only implies a lack of distinctiveness, but also a lack of consistency and specificity concerning relations to outcomes. As a remedy, any aversive trait can be conceived as the conjuncture of (a) the aversive essence shared across all aversive traits and (b) an essentially non-aversive unique part. Beyond tackling the identified issues, this approach avails several additional benefits, including increased parsimony while maintaining or increasing predictive power.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001241\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X25001241","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reconceptualizing ethically and socially aversive (“dark”) personality traits
Many ethically and socially aversive (“dark”) traits have been proposed to account for corresponding behaviors. Despite their popularity and success in predicting relevant outcomes, research on aversive traits is beset both by conceptual overlap between traits assigned different labels and by heterogenous conceptualizations of traits assigned the same label. This not only implies a lack of distinctiveness, but also a lack of consistency and specificity concerning relations to outcomes. As a remedy, any aversive trait can be conceived as the conjuncture of (a) the aversive essence shared across all aversive traits and (b) an essentially non-aversive unique part. Beyond tackling the identified issues, this approach avails several additional benefits, including increased parsimony while maintaining or increasing predictive power.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows.
Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include:
* Biological psychology
* Clinical psychology
* Cognitive psychology
* Community psychology
* Comparative psychology
* Developmental psychology
* Educational psychology
* Environmental psychology
* Evolutionary psychology
* Health psychology
* Neuropsychology
* Personality psychology
* Social psychology