Panagiotis Ntovas, Piyarat Sirirattanagool, Praewvanit Asavanamuang, Shruti Jain, Lorenzo Tavelli, Marta Revilla-León, Maria Eliza Galarraga-Vinueza
{"title":"人工智能驱动的CBCT图像牙齿分割的准确性和时效性:两种种植规划软件的验证研究。","authors":"Panagiotis Ntovas, Piyarat Sirirattanagool, Praewvanit Asavanamuang, Shruti Jain, Lorenzo Tavelli, Marta Revilla-León, Maria Eliza Galarraga-Vinueza","doi":"10.1111/clr.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the accuracy and time efficiency of manual versus artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tooth segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, using AI tools integrated within implant planning software, and to evaluate the impact of artifacts, dental arch, tooth type, and region.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Fourteen patients who underwent CBCT scans were randomly selected for this study. Using the acquired datasets, 67 extracted teeth were segmented using one manual and two AI-driven tools. The segmentation time for each method was recorded. The extracted teeth were scanned with an intraoral scanner to serve as the reference. The virtual models generated by each segmentation method were superimposed with the surface scan models to calculate volumetric discrepancies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The discrepancy between the evaluated AI-driven and manual segmentation methods ranged from 0.10 to 0.98 mm, with a mean RMS of 0.27 (0.11) mm. Manual segmentation resulted in less RMS deviation compared to both AI-driven methods (CDX; BSB) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significant differences were observed between all investigated segmentation methods, both for the overall tooth area and each region, with the apical portion of the root showing the lowest accuracy (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Tooth type did not have a significant effect on segmentation (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Both AI-driven segmentation methods reduced segmentation time compared to manual segmentation (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>AI-driven segmentation can generate reliable virtual 3D tooth models, with accuracy comparable to that of manual segmentation performed by experienced clinicians, while also significantly improving time efficiency. To further enhance accuracy in cases involving restoration artifacts, continued development and optimization of AI-driven tooth segmentation models are necessary.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"36 10","pages":"1312-1323"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Tooth Segmentation on CBCT Images: A Validation Study Using Two Implant Planning Software Programs\",\"authors\":\"Panagiotis Ntovas, Piyarat Sirirattanagool, Praewvanit Asavanamuang, Shruti Jain, Lorenzo Tavelli, Marta Revilla-León, Maria Eliza Galarraga-Vinueza\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the accuracy and time efficiency of manual versus artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tooth segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, using AI tools integrated within implant planning software, and to evaluate the impact of artifacts, dental arch, tooth type, and region.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fourteen patients who underwent CBCT scans were randomly selected for this study. Using the acquired datasets, 67 extracted teeth were segmented using one manual and two AI-driven tools. The segmentation time for each method was recorded. The extracted teeth were scanned with an intraoral scanner to serve as the reference. The virtual models generated by each segmentation method were superimposed with the surface scan models to calculate volumetric discrepancies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The discrepancy between the evaluated AI-driven and manual segmentation methods ranged from 0.10 to 0.98 mm, with a mean RMS of 0.27 (0.11) mm. Manual segmentation resulted in less RMS deviation compared to both AI-driven methods (CDX; BSB) (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significant differences were observed between all investigated segmentation methods, both for the overall tooth area and each region, with the apical portion of the root showing the lowest accuracy (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Tooth type did not have a significant effect on segmentation (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Both AI-driven segmentation methods reduced segmentation time compared to manual segmentation (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>AI-driven segmentation can generate reliable virtual 3D tooth models, with accuracy comparable to that of manual segmentation performed by experienced clinicians, while also significantly improving time efficiency. To further enhance accuracy in cases involving restoration artifacts, continued development and optimization of AI-driven tooth segmentation models are necessary.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"36 10\",\"pages\":\"1312-1323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.70003\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/clr.70003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Tooth Segmentation on CBCT Images: A Validation Study Using Two Implant Planning Software Programs
Objectives
To assess the accuracy and time efficiency of manual versus artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tooth segmentation on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, using AI tools integrated within implant planning software, and to evaluate the impact of artifacts, dental arch, tooth type, and region.
Materials and Methods
Fourteen patients who underwent CBCT scans were randomly selected for this study. Using the acquired datasets, 67 extracted teeth were segmented using one manual and two AI-driven tools. The segmentation time for each method was recorded. The extracted teeth were scanned with an intraoral scanner to serve as the reference. The virtual models generated by each segmentation method were superimposed with the surface scan models to calculate volumetric discrepancies.
Results
The discrepancy between the evaluated AI-driven and manual segmentation methods ranged from 0.10 to 0.98 mm, with a mean RMS of 0.27 (0.11) mm. Manual segmentation resulted in less RMS deviation compared to both AI-driven methods (CDX; BSB) (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed between all investigated segmentation methods, both for the overall tooth area and each region, with the apical portion of the root showing the lowest accuracy (p < 0.05). Tooth type did not have a significant effect on segmentation (p > 0.05). Both AI-driven segmentation methods reduced segmentation time compared to manual segmentation (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
AI-driven segmentation can generate reliable virtual 3D tooth models, with accuracy comparable to that of manual segmentation performed by experienced clinicians, while also significantly improving time efficiency. To further enhance accuracy in cases involving restoration artifacts, continued development and optimization of AI-driven tooth segmentation models are necessary.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.