非恶性疾病:肌肉骨骼损伤后的健康结果。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michele Sterling, Rachel A Elphinston, Scott F Farrell, Christopher Papic, Yanfei Xie
{"title":"非恶性疾病:肌肉骨骼损伤后的健康结果。","authors":"Michele Sterling, Rachel A Elphinston, Scott F Farrell, Christopher Papic, Yanfei Xie","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Musculoskeletal pain following a road traffic crash is common and incurs substantial personal and economic costs. Current recommended treatments of reassurance and advice to stay active, exercise and simple analgesics are not very effective. This review describes the current evidence for health outcomes and potential processes involved in the persistence of pain. It also outlines promising current and future treatments aimed at the prevention of chronic pain after musculoskeletal injury.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent literature highlights a more complex clinical presentation including greater pain-related disability and nociplastic pain features of traumatic musculoskeletal pain compared to non-traumatic pain. Some studies have found evidence for the presence of neuropathic pain in a sub-group of patients. Accurate risk-prediction screening tools exist for neck pain following road traffic injury and clinical trials using these tools show promise where treatment is targeted to identified risk factors.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Traumatic musculoskeletal pain is characterised by a more complex, high-burden clinical presentation, with worse health outcomes compared to non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain. There is emerging evidence that multi-factorial stress-related processes, neuroimmune factors, and neuropathic pain may underlie these differences. Early treatments targeting risk factors for poor recovery, including stress symptoms and pro-nociceptive processes show promise in improving outcomes for injured people.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"155-161"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-malignant diseases: health outcomes after musculoskeletal injury.\",\"authors\":\"Michele Sterling, Rachel A Elphinston, Scott F Farrell, Christopher Papic, Yanfei Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Musculoskeletal pain following a road traffic crash is common and incurs substantial personal and economic costs. Current recommended treatments of reassurance and advice to stay active, exercise and simple analgesics are not very effective. This review describes the current evidence for health outcomes and potential processes involved in the persistence of pain. It also outlines promising current and future treatments aimed at the prevention of chronic pain after musculoskeletal injury.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent literature highlights a more complex clinical presentation including greater pain-related disability and nociplastic pain features of traumatic musculoskeletal pain compared to non-traumatic pain. Some studies have found evidence for the presence of neuropathic pain in a sub-group of patients. Accurate risk-prediction screening tools exist for neck pain following road traffic injury and clinical trials using these tools show promise where treatment is targeted to identified risk factors.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Traumatic musculoskeletal pain is characterised by a more complex, high-burden clinical presentation, with worse health outcomes compared to non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain. There is emerging evidence that multi-factorial stress-related processes, neuroimmune factors, and neuropathic pain may underlie these differences. Early treatments targeting risk factors for poor recovery, including stress symptoms and pro-nociceptive processes show promise in improving outcomes for injured people.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"155-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000766\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000766","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾目的:道路交通事故后的肌肉骨骼疼痛是常见的,并且会产生大量的个人和经济成本。目前推荐的治疗方法是保持活跃、锻炼和简单的止痛剂,这些都不是很有效。这篇综述描述了目前关于疼痛持续存在的健康结果和潜在过程的证据。它还概述了旨在预防肌肉骨骼损伤后慢性疼痛的有希望的当前和未来治疗方法。最近的发现:最近的文献强调,与非创伤性疼痛相比,创伤性肌肉骨骼疼痛的临床表现更为复杂,包括更大的疼痛相关残疾和伤害性疼痛特征。一些研究已经发现在一个亚组患者中存在神经性疼痛的证据。对于道路交通伤害后的颈部疼痛,已经有了准确的风险预测筛查工具,使用这些工具进行的临床试验显示,针对确定的风险因素进行治疗是有希望的。摘要:外伤性肌肉骨骼疼痛的特点是更复杂、高负担的临床表现,与非外伤性肌肉骨骼疼痛相比,健康结果更差。越来越多的证据表明,多因素应激相关过程、神经免疫因素和神经性疼痛可能是这些差异的基础。针对导致恢复不良的风险因素(包括压力症状和促伤害过程)的早期治疗有望改善伤者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-malignant diseases: health outcomes after musculoskeletal injury.

Purpose of review: Musculoskeletal pain following a road traffic crash is common and incurs substantial personal and economic costs. Current recommended treatments of reassurance and advice to stay active, exercise and simple analgesics are not very effective. This review describes the current evidence for health outcomes and potential processes involved in the persistence of pain. It also outlines promising current and future treatments aimed at the prevention of chronic pain after musculoskeletal injury.

Recent findings: Recent literature highlights a more complex clinical presentation including greater pain-related disability and nociplastic pain features of traumatic musculoskeletal pain compared to non-traumatic pain. Some studies have found evidence for the presence of neuropathic pain in a sub-group of patients. Accurate risk-prediction screening tools exist for neck pain following road traffic injury and clinical trials using these tools show promise where treatment is targeted to identified risk factors.

Summary: Traumatic musculoskeletal pain is characterised by a more complex, high-burden clinical presentation, with worse health outcomes compared to non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain. There is emerging evidence that multi-factorial stress-related processes, neuroimmune factors, and neuropathic pain may underlie these differences. Early treatments targeting risk factors for poor recovery, including stress symptoms and pro-nociceptive processes show promise in improving outcomes for injured people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信