路口车辆盲区和行人安全:用数学模拟识别高风险场景。

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sushant R Jagtap, Jessica S Jermakian
{"title":"路口车辆盲区和行人安全:用数学模拟识别高风险场景。","authors":"Sushant R Jagtap, Jessica S Jermakian","doi":"10.1080/15389588.2025.2520915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study presents a novel simulation-based methodology to systematically assess how vehicle blind zones, intersection geometry, and the speed and direction of both vehicles and pedestrians interact to influence pedestrian visibility at intersections. Focusing on a diverse set of vehicle designs and intersection scenarios, the framework identifies high-risk situations where blind zones may critically impair a driver's ability to detect and respond to crossing pedestrians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blind zone data from 20 vehicles representing a range of classes were used. A custom simulation code modeled interactions between crossing pedestrians and vehicle blind zones in four intersection geometries: baseline, narrow lane, wide lane, and offset crosswalk. For each geometry, vehicle speed (4.2 m/s or 15 km/h, 5.6 m/s or 20 km/h, 6.9 m/s or 25 km/h), vehicle trajectory (straight, left, right), and turning trajectory (sharp, average, wide) were simulated. Crossing pedestrians were modeled for two travel directions (from the driver-side and passenger-side A-pillar) at three speeds (0.8, 1.2, 1.8 m/s). Output metrics included time the pedestrian spends in the blind zone, percentage of crossing time in the blind zone, and available driver reaction time once the pedestrian is visible to the driver.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vehicle blind zone areas ranged from 242 to 478 m<sup>2</sup>. Pedestrians were predominantly obscured during left-turn maneuvers, especially when approaching from the driver-side A-pillar, resulting in an average time in the blind zone of 1.7 s compared with 0.8 s for passenger-side approaches. Lower vehicle speeds combined with fast pedestrian speeds further increased this duration, while higher speeds reduced the available driver reaction time. Intersection geometry and turning radius also affected these metrics. Regression analyses indicated that although blind zone area did not predict total obscuration time, it was significantly associated with delayed pedestrian entry/exit and longer available driver reaction time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study used a novel simulation methodology to demonstrate that vehicle blind zones can critically affect pedestrian visibility, particularly in left-turn scenarios involving driver-side pedestrian approaches. While blind zone area is an important metric, finer design features (e.g., A-pillar dimensions) and dynamic factors such as vehicle speed, turning behavior, and intersection layout play a crucial role in determining pedestrian visibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":54422,"journal":{"name":"Traffic Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vehicle blind zones and pedestrian safety at intersections: identifying high-risk scenarios using mathematical simulations.\",\"authors\":\"Sushant R Jagtap, Jessica S Jermakian\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15389588.2025.2520915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study presents a novel simulation-based methodology to systematically assess how vehicle blind zones, intersection geometry, and the speed and direction of both vehicles and pedestrians interact to influence pedestrian visibility at intersections. Focusing on a diverse set of vehicle designs and intersection scenarios, the framework identifies high-risk situations where blind zones may critically impair a driver's ability to detect and respond to crossing pedestrians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Blind zone data from 20 vehicles representing a range of classes were used. A custom simulation code modeled interactions between crossing pedestrians and vehicle blind zones in four intersection geometries: baseline, narrow lane, wide lane, and offset crosswalk. For each geometry, vehicle speed (4.2 m/s or 15 km/h, 5.6 m/s or 20 km/h, 6.9 m/s or 25 km/h), vehicle trajectory (straight, left, right), and turning trajectory (sharp, average, wide) were simulated. Crossing pedestrians were modeled for two travel directions (from the driver-side and passenger-side A-pillar) at three speeds (0.8, 1.2, 1.8 m/s). Output metrics included time the pedestrian spends in the blind zone, percentage of crossing time in the blind zone, and available driver reaction time once the pedestrian is visible to the driver.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vehicle blind zone areas ranged from 242 to 478 m<sup>2</sup>. Pedestrians were predominantly obscured during left-turn maneuvers, especially when approaching from the driver-side A-pillar, resulting in an average time in the blind zone of 1.7 s compared with 0.8 s for passenger-side approaches. Lower vehicle speeds combined with fast pedestrian speeds further increased this duration, while higher speeds reduced the available driver reaction time. Intersection geometry and turning radius also affected these metrics. Regression analyses indicated that although blind zone area did not predict total obscuration time, it was significantly associated with delayed pedestrian entry/exit and longer available driver reaction time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study used a novel simulation methodology to demonstrate that vehicle blind zones can critically affect pedestrian visibility, particularly in left-turn scenarios involving driver-side pedestrian approaches. While blind zone area is an important metric, finer design features (e.g., A-pillar dimensions) and dynamic factors such as vehicle speed, turning behavior, and intersection layout play a crucial role in determining pedestrian visibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Traffic Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2520915\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Traffic Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2520915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究提出了一种新颖的基于仿真的方法,系统地评估车辆盲区、交叉口几何形状、车辆和行人的速度和方向如何相互作用,从而影响交叉口行人的能见度。该框架专注于多种车辆设计和十字路口场景,确定了高风险情况,其中盲区可能严重损害驾驶员检测和应对过路行人的能力。方法:使用代表一系列类别的20辆车的盲区数据。自定义仿真代码模拟了四种十字路口几何形状中行人与车辆盲区之间的相互作用:基线、窄车道、宽车道和偏移人行横道。对于每个几何图形,模拟了车辆速度(4.2 m/s或15 km/h, 5.6 m/s或20 km/h, 6.9 m/s或25 km/h),车辆轨迹(直线,左,右)和转弯轨迹(急转弯,平均转弯,宽转弯)。以三种速度(0.8,1.2,1.8 m/s)对两个方向(驾驶员侧和乘客侧a柱)的过街行人进行建模。输出指标包括行人在盲区停留的时间、在盲区过马路的时间百分比,以及驾驶员看到行人后的可用反应时间。结果:车辆盲区面积242 ~ 478 m2。行人在左转机动时主要被遮挡,尤其是从驾驶员侧的a柱接近时,导致行人在盲区的平均时间为1.7秒,而乘客侧的平均时间为0.8秒。较低的车速加上快速的行人速度进一步增加了这一持续时间,而较高的车速减少了驾驶员的可用反应时间。交叉口几何形状和转弯半径也会影响这些指标。回归分析表明,盲区面积虽然不能预测总遮挡时间,但与行人进入/退出延迟和驾驶员反应时间延长显著相关。结论:本研究使用了一种新颖的模拟方法来证明车辆盲区会严重影响行人的能见度,特别是在涉及驾驶员侧行人接近的左转弯场景中。虽然盲区面积是一个重要的指标,但更精细的设计特征(如a柱尺寸)和车辆速度、转向行为和交叉口布局等动态因素在决定行人能见度方面发挥着至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vehicle blind zones and pedestrian safety at intersections: identifying high-risk scenarios using mathematical simulations.

Objective: This study presents a novel simulation-based methodology to systematically assess how vehicle blind zones, intersection geometry, and the speed and direction of both vehicles and pedestrians interact to influence pedestrian visibility at intersections. Focusing on a diverse set of vehicle designs and intersection scenarios, the framework identifies high-risk situations where blind zones may critically impair a driver's ability to detect and respond to crossing pedestrians.

Methods: Blind zone data from 20 vehicles representing a range of classes were used. A custom simulation code modeled interactions between crossing pedestrians and vehicle blind zones in four intersection geometries: baseline, narrow lane, wide lane, and offset crosswalk. For each geometry, vehicle speed (4.2 m/s or 15 km/h, 5.6 m/s or 20 km/h, 6.9 m/s or 25 km/h), vehicle trajectory (straight, left, right), and turning trajectory (sharp, average, wide) were simulated. Crossing pedestrians were modeled for two travel directions (from the driver-side and passenger-side A-pillar) at three speeds (0.8, 1.2, 1.8 m/s). Output metrics included time the pedestrian spends in the blind zone, percentage of crossing time in the blind zone, and available driver reaction time once the pedestrian is visible to the driver.

Results: Vehicle blind zone areas ranged from 242 to 478 m2. Pedestrians were predominantly obscured during left-turn maneuvers, especially when approaching from the driver-side A-pillar, resulting in an average time in the blind zone of 1.7 s compared with 0.8 s for passenger-side approaches. Lower vehicle speeds combined with fast pedestrian speeds further increased this duration, while higher speeds reduced the available driver reaction time. Intersection geometry and turning radius also affected these metrics. Regression analyses indicated that although blind zone area did not predict total obscuration time, it was significantly associated with delayed pedestrian entry/exit and longer available driver reaction time.

Conclusions: This study used a novel simulation methodology to demonstrate that vehicle blind zones can critically affect pedestrian visibility, particularly in left-turn scenarios involving driver-side pedestrian approaches. While blind zone area is an important metric, finer design features (e.g., A-pillar dimensions) and dynamic factors such as vehicle speed, turning behavior, and intersection layout play a crucial role in determining pedestrian visibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Traffic Injury Prevention
Traffic Injury Prevention PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Traffic Injury Prevention is to bridge the disciplines of medicine, engineering, public health and traffic safety in order to foster the science of traffic injury prevention. The archival journal focuses on research, interventions and evaluations within the areas of traffic safety, crash causation, injury prevention and treatment. General topics within the journal''s scope are driver behavior, road infrastructure, emerging crash avoidance technologies, crash and injury epidemiology, alcohol and drugs, impact injury biomechanics, vehicle crashworthiness, occupant restraints, pedestrian safety, evaluation of interventions, economic consequences and emergency and clinical care with specific application to traffic injury prevention. The journal includes full length papers, review articles, case studies, brief technical notes and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信