护士职业疲劳水平与危险因素:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-07-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0326519
Rong Pi, Yunfang Liu, Rong Yan, Zong De, Yali Wan, Yi Chen, Zihan He, Fang Liu, Yan Wang, Suyun Li
{"title":"护士职业疲劳水平与危险因素:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Rong Pi, Yunfang Liu, Rong Yan, Zong De, Yali Wan, Yi Chen, Zihan He, Fang Liu, Yan Wang, Suyun Li","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0326519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational fatigue, characterized by both physical and mental exhaustion, is a pressing concern in various professions, particularly among nurses. Studies have consistently linked occupational fatigue to decreased productivity, heightened error rates, and compromised decision-making abilities, posing significant risks to both individual nurses and healthcare organizations. Despite its recognized impact, the global prevalence of occupational fatigue among nurses remains incompletely understood, and rigorous evaluations of the multifaceted factors influencing nurses' occupational fatigue are scarce in the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to estimate the pooled score of nurses' occupational fatigue, and to systematically review the factors associated with nurses' occupational fatigue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review searched eight databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Chinese databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biological Medical (CBM), and Wan Fang Database. The temporal scope of our search covers the period from the inception of each database to October 1, 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of the meta-analysis and systematic review. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 18.0 software, employing a random-effects model to pool the mean score and standard deviation of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER) scale. The restricted maximum-likelihood estimator was utilized to calculate the heterogeneity variance τ². Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. The registration PROSPERO number is CRD42023456337.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a rigorous selection process, 28 articles were ultimately deemed suitable for inclusion in this article, which encompassed a total of 13,290 registered nurses. The pooled mean scores for chronic fatigue, acute fatigue, and inter-shift recovery were 53.24 (95% CI: 48.42-58.28), 64.00 (95% CI: 60.62-67.38), and 47.37 (95% CI: 43.24-51.50), respectively. The subgroup analyses of occupational fatigue among nurses yield crucial insights into the way regional, age, temporal, and departmental factors interact to influence fatigue levels. In addition, the factors affecting nurses' occupational fatigue were found to include cultural, organizational and individual variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A moderately high level of acute and chronic fatigue was observed among nurses, while the level of inter-shift recovery was low to moderate. It is imperative that healthcare systems provide enhanced support for nurses, a multifaceted approach is required, encompassing cultural shifts to reduce the normalization of overwork, organizational reforms to enhance staffing and scheduling, the implementation of fair compensation mechanisms, the development of targeted educational programs and individual-level interventions to promote healthier lifestyle practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 7","pages":"e0326519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273991/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' occupational fatigue level and risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Rong Pi, Yunfang Liu, Rong Yan, Zong De, Yali Wan, Yi Chen, Zihan He, Fang Liu, Yan Wang, Suyun Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0326519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occupational fatigue, characterized by both physical and mental exhaustion, is a pressing concern in various professions, particularly among nurses. Studies have consistently linked occupational fatigue to decreased productivity, heightened error rates, and compromised decision-making abilities, posing significant risks to both individual nurses and healthcare organizations. Despite its recognized impact, the global prevalence of occupational fatigue among nurses remains incompletely understood, and rigorous evaluations of the multifaceted factors influencing nurses' occupational fatigue are scarce in the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to estimate the pooled score of nurses' occupational fatigue, and to systematically review the factors associated with nurses' occupational fatigue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review searched eight databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Chinese databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biological Medical (CBM), and Wan Fang Database. The temporal scope of our search covers the period from the inception of each database to October 1, 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of the meta-analysis and systematic review. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 18.0 software, employing a random-effects model to pool the mean score and standard deviation of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER) scale. The restricted maximum-likelihood estimator was utilized to calculate the heterogeneity variance τ². Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. The registration PROSPERO number is CRD42023456337.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a rigorous selection process, 28 articles were ultimately deemed suitable for inclusion in this article, which encompassed a total of 13,290 registered nurses. The pooled mean scores for chronic fatigue, acute fatigue, and inter-shift recovery were 53.24 (95% CI: 48.42-58.28), 64.00 (95% CI: 60.62-67.38), and 47.37 (95% CI: 43.24-51.50), respectively. The subgroup analyses of occupational fatigue among nurses yield crucial insights into the way regional, age, temporal, and departmental factors interact to influence fatigue levels. In addition, the factors affecting nurses' occupational fatigue were found to include cultural, organizational and individual variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A moderately high level of acute and chronic fatigue was observed among nurses, while the level of inter-shift recovery was low to moderate. It is imperative that healthcare systems provide enhanced support for nurses, a multifaceted approach is required, encompassing cultural shifts to reduce the normalization of overwork, organizational reforms to enhance staffing and scheduling, the implementation of fair compensation mechanisms, the development of targeted educational programs and individual-level interventions to promote healthier lifestyle practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 7\",\"pages\":\"e0326519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12273991/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326519\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:职业疲劳,其特点是身体和精神疲惫,是一个紧迫的关注在各个行业,特别是护士。研究一致将职业疲劳与生产力下降、错误率增加和决策能力受损联系起来,这对护士个人和医疗机构都构成了重大风险。尽管其公认的影响,全球流行的护士职业疲劳仍然不完全了解,和严格的评估多方面因素影响护士职业疲劳的现有文献很少。目的:本研究旨在评估护士职业疲劳的综合得分,并系统回顾护士职业疲劳的相关因素。方法:检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、CINAHL、PsycINFO等8个数据库,以及中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学(CBM)、万方数据库等中文数据库。我们搜索的时间范围涵盖了从每个数据库建立到2023年10月1日的这段时间。meta分析和系统评价的报告遵循PRISMA指南。meta分析采用Stata 18.0软件,采用随机效应模型汇总职业疲劳衰竭恢复(OFER)量表的平均分和标准差。利用限制性最大似然估计量计算异质性方差τ²。亚组分析探讨异质性的来源。注册号为CRD42023456337。结果:经过严格的筛选过程,最终有28篇文章被认为适合纳入本文,共包括13290名注册护士。慢性疲劳、急性疲劳和轮班间恢复的综合平均评分分别为53.24 (95% CI: 48.42-58.28)、64.00 (95% CI: 60.62-67.38)和47.37 (95% CI: 43.24-51.50)。护士职业疲劳的亚组分析对地区、年龄、时间和部门因素相互作用影响疲劳水平的方式产生了重要的见解。此外,还发现影响护士职业疲劳的因素包括文化、组织和个人变量。结论:护士的急慢性疲劳程度为中高水平,轮班间恢复水平为中低水平。医疗保健系统必须加强对护士的支持,需要采取多方面的方法,包括文化转变以减少过度工作的常态化,组织改革以加强人员配备和日程安排,实施公平的薪酬机制,发展有针对性的教育计划和个人层面的干预措施以促进更健康的生活方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurses' occupational fatigue level and risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Occupational fatigue, characterized by both physical and mental exhaustion, is a pressing concern in various professions, particularly among nurses. Studies have consistently linked occupational fatigue to decreased productivity, heightened error rates, and compromised decision-making abilities, posing significant risks to both individual nurses and healthcare organizations. Despite its recognized impact, the global prevalence of occupational fatigue among nurses remains incompletely understood, and rigorous evaluations of the multifaceted factors influencing nurses' occupational fatigue are scarce in the existing literature.

Objectives: This study aims to estimate the pooled score of nurses' occupational fatigue, and to systematically review the factors associated with nurses' occupational fatigue.

Methods: The review searched eight databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Chinese databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biological Medical (CBM), and Wan Fang Database. The temporal scope of our search covers the period from the inception of each database to October 1, 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed in the reporting of the meta-analysis and systematic review. The meta-analysis was conducted using Stata 18.0 software, employing a random-effects model to pool the mean score and standard deviation of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER) scale. The restricted maximum-likelihood estimator was utilized to calculate the heterogeneity variance τ². Subgroup analysis was conducted to explore sources of heterogeneity. The registration PROSPERO number is CRD42023456337.

Results: After a rigorous selection process, 28 articles were ultimately deemed suitable for inclusion in this article, which encompassed a total of 13,290 registered nurses. The pooled mean scores for chronic fatigue, acute fatigue, and inter-shift recovery were 53.24 (95% CI: 48.42-58.28), 64.00 (95% CI: 60.62-67.38), and 47.37 (95% CI: 43.24-51.50), respectively. The subgroup analyses of occupational fatigue among nurses yield crucial insights into the way regional, age, temporal, and departmental factors interact to influence fatigue levels. In addition, the factors affecting nurses' occupational fatigue were found to include cultural, organizational and individual variables.

Conclusion: A moderately high level of acute and chronic fatigue was observed among nurses, while the level of inter-shift recovery was low to moderate. It is imperative that healthcare systems provide enhanced support for nurses, a multifaceted approach is required, encompassing cultural shifts to reduce the normalization of overwork, organizational reforms to enhance staffing and scheduling, the implementation of fair compensation mechanisms, the development of targeted educational programs and individual-level interventions to promote healthier lifestyle practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信