以挤出豆粕为蛋白质源饲喂全混合日粮对绵羊消化代谢的影响。

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Mauro E A Vargas, Claudio A Pozo, Carla J Härter, Mariana P Mezzomo, Ana L S B de Miranda, Camila Ten Kathen Jung, Diego S Zeni, Gilberto V Kozloski
{"title":"以挤出豆粕为蛋白质源饲喂全混合日粮对绵羊消化代谢的影响。","authors":"Mauro E A Vargas, Claudio A Pozo, Carla J Härter, Mariana P Mezzomo, Ana L S B de Miranda, Camila Ten Kathen Jung, Diego S Zeni, Gilberto V Kozloski","doi":"10.1080/1745039X.2025.2526364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of including extruded-expelled soybean meal (ESBM) as the main protein source in a total mixed ration (TMR) offered to sheep on digestive and metabolic parameters, in comparison to protein sources with known nutritional properties: solvent-extracted soybean meal (SBM; high ruminal degradability) and dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS; low ruminal degradability). Five Corriedale × Suffolk crossbreed male sheep (33.7 ± 4 kg body weight) fitted with ruminal catheters and duodenal cannulas were used in an incomplete double 3 × 3 Latin square design, comprising three experimental periods of 20 d each. On a dry matter basis, the TMR was composed of corn silage (0.60) and a mixture of concentrate feedstuffs (0.40), which included ground corn and one of three protein sources: ESBM, SBM, or DDGS. The sheep receiving TMR with ESBM showed intermediate organic matter digestibility compared to SBM and DDGS and lower neutral detergent fibre digestibility together with DDGS (<i>p</i> <0.05). Rumen fermentation and digestion variables were similar between ESBM and SBM, but the N use efficiency tended to be higher in ESBM (<i>p</i> <0.08). Compared to ESBM and SBM, DDGS decreased the N digestibility, the concentrations of ruminal ammonia-N and the urinary N losses, and increased the duodenal flow of non-ammonia non-microbial N (NANMN) and α-amino N (<i>p</i> <0.05). In conclusion, replacing SBM with ESBM in TMR offered to sheep did not impact most of the rumen fermentation and digestion variables whereas improved the efficiency of N utilisation. In contrast, replacing SBM with DDGS in TMR for sheep has been shown to reduce N losses through urine, increase the duodenal flow of dietary N, and improve N utilisation efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":8157,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Animal Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digestive and metabolic impact of using extruded-expelled soybean meal as a protein source for sheep fed with a total mixed ration.\",\"authors\":\"Mauro E A Vargas, Claudio A Pozo, Carla J Härter, Mariana P Mezzomo, Ana L S B de Miranda, Camila Ten Kathen Jung, Diego S Zeni, Gilberto V Kozloski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1745039X.2025.2526364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of including extruded-expelled soybean meal (ESBM) as the main protein source in a total mixed ration (TMR) offered to sheep on digestive and metabolic parameters, in comparison to protein sources with known nutritional properties: solvent-extracted soybean meal (SBM; high ruminal degradability) and dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS; low ruminal degradability). Five Corriedale × Suffolk crossbreed male sheep (33.7 ± 4 kg body weight) fitted with ruminal catheters and duodenal cannulas were used in an incomplete double 3 × 3 Latin square design, comprising three experimental periods of 20 d each. On a dry matter basis, the TMR was composed of corn silage (0.60) and a mixture of concentrate feedstuffs (0.40), which included ground corn and one of three protein sources: ESBM, SBM, or DDGS. The sheep receiving TMR with ESBM showed intermediate organic matter digestibility compared to SBM and DDGS and lower neutral detergent fibre digestibility together with DDGS (<i>p</i> <0.05). Rumen fermentation and digestion variables were similar between ESBM and SBM, but the N use efficiency tended to be higher in ESBM (<i>p</i> <0.08). Compared to ESBM and SBM, DDGS decreased the N digestibility, the concentrations of ruminal ammonia-N and the urinary N losses, and increased the duodenal flow of non-ammonia non-microbial N (NANMN) and α-amino N (<i>p</i> <0.05). In conclusion, replacing SBM with ESBM in TMR offered to sheep did not impact most of the rumen fermentation and digestion variables whereas improved the efficiency of N utilisation. In contrast, replacing SBM with DDGS in TMR for sheep has been shown to reduce N losses through urine, increase the duodenal flow of dietary N, and improve N utilisation efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Animal Nutrition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Animal Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2025.2526364\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2025.2526364","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评价在全混合日粮中添加挤出豆粕(ESBM)作为主要蛋白质来源对绵羊消化代谢参数的影响,并与已知营养特性的蛋白质来源:溶剂提取豆粕(SBM);高瘤胃降解率)和干酒糟(DDGS;瘤胃降解率低)。选用5只体重为33.7±4 kg的Corriedale × Suffolk杂交公羊,采用不完全双3 × 3拉丁方设计,安装瘤胃导管和十二指肠瘘管,分为3个试验期,每个试验期20 d。在干物质基础上,TMR由玉米青贮饲料(0.60)和精料饲料(0.40)的混合物组成,精料饲料包括磨碎的玉米和三种蛋白质来源中的一种:ESBM、SBM或DDGS。用ESBM进行TMR的绵羊,其有机物消化率较SBM和DDGS中等,中性洗涤纤维消化率较DDGS低(p p p p)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digestive and metabolic impact of using extruded-expelled soybean meal as a protein source for sheep fed with a total mixed ration.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of including extruded-expelled soybean meal (ESBM) as the main protein source in a total mixed ration (TMR) offered to sheep on digestive and metabolic parameters, in comparison to protein sources with known nutritional properties: solvent-extracted soybean meal (SBM; high ruminal degradability) and dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS; low ruminal degradability). Five Corriedale × Suffolk crossbreed male sheep (33.7 ± 4 kg body weight) fitted with ruminal catheters and duodenal cannulas were used in an incomplete double 3 × 3 Latin square design, comprising three experimental periods of 20 d each. On a dry matter basis, the TMR was composed of corn silage (0.60) and a mixture of concentrate feedstuffs (0.40), which included ground corn and one of three protein sources: ESBM, SBM, or DDGS. The sheep receiving TMR with ESBM showed intermediate organic matter digestibility compared to SBM and DDGS and lower neutral detergent fibre digestibility together with DDGS (p <0.05). Rumen fermentation and digestion variables were similar between ESBM and SBM, but the N use efficiency tended to be higher in ESBM (p <0.08). Compared to ESBM and SBM, DDGS decreased the N digestibility, the concentrations of ruminal ammonia-N and the urinary N losses, and increased the duodenal flow of non-ammonia non-microbial N (NANMN) and α-amino N (p <0.05). In conclusion, replacing SBM with ESBM in TMR offered to sheep did not impact most of the rumen fermentation and digestion variables whereas improved the efficiency of N utilisation. In contrast, replacing SBM with DDGS in TMR for sheep has been shown to reduce N losses through urine, increase the duodenal flow of dietary N, and improve N utilisation efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Animal Nutrition
Archives of Animal Nutrition 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Animal Nutrition is an international journal covering the biochemical and physiological basis of animal nutrition. Emphasis is laid on original papers on protein and amino acid metabolism, energy transformation, mineral metabolism, vitamin metabolism, nutritional effects on intestinal and body functions in combination with performance criteria, respectively. It furthermore deals with recent developments in practical animal feeding, feedstuff theory, mode of action of feed additives, feedstuff preservation and feedstuff processing. The spectrum covers all relevant animal species including food producing and companion animals, but not aquatic species. Seldom can priority be given to papers covering more descriptive studies, even if they may be interesting and technically sound or of impact for animal production, or for topics of relevance for only particular regional conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信