代谢疤痕:尽管体重减轻,过去肥胖对长期代谢健康的持续影响

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ali Hemade, Pascale Salameh
{"title":"代谢疤痕:尽管体重减轻,过去肥胖对长期代谢健康的持续影响","authors":"Ali Hemade,&nbsp;Pascale Salameh","doi":"10.1002/edm2.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Conventional cardiometabolic risk assessment relies primarily on a patient's current body mass index, yet individuals who have lost weight after a period of obesity may continue to harbour elevated metabolic risk. We sought to quantify the persistent impact of past obesity on glycaemic control and to develop a clinical risk score that integrates weight history with current risk factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 15,422 adults (≥ 18 years) from the 2011–2020 NHANES cycles. Participants with complete self-reported weight history (highest adult weight, weight 1 year ago, number of ≥ 5% weight-loss episodes) and measured BMI were included. Metabolic scarring was defined by elevated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ≥ 5.7%) or HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5. We applied inverse-probability-weighted logistic regression to estimate the association between prior obesity and current HbA1c, adjusting for confounders. We then refit a survey-weighted logistic model using age per decade, current BMI, weight-history category, sex and race/ethnicity, converting regression coefficients into an integer point-based score. Discrimination was evaluated by survey-weighted area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Formerly obese individuals exhibited significantly higher HbA1c than never-obese peers (adjusted <i>β</i> = 0.58%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.002), indicative of metabolic scarring. The derived risk score ranged from −31 to +90 points (median = 6; IQR = −3 to 16) and achieved an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.77–0.81). Age per decade, BMI, and weight history contributed 4, 1 and up to 4 points, respectively; female sex and Non-Hispanic White race subtracted points. Calibration across predicted-risk deciles was excellent (slope = 0.98).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A history of obesity imparts a lasting glycemic risk that is not captured by current BMI alone. Our metabolic scarring risk score offers a pragmatic tool for identifying individuals at elevated metabolic risk despite weight normalisation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36522,"journal":{"name":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70086","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metabolic Scarring: The Persistent Impact of Past Obesity on Long-Term Metabolic Health Despite Weight Loss\",\"authors\":\"Ali Hemade,&nbsp;Pascale Salameh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edm2.70086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Conventional cardiometabolic risk assessment relies primarily on a patient's current body mass index, yet individuals who have lost weight after a period of obesity may continue to harbour elevated metabolic risk. We sought to quantify the persistent impact of past obesity on glycaemic control and to develop a clinical risk score that integrates weight history with current risk factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 15,422 adults (≥ 18 years) from the 2011–2020 NHANES cycles. Participants with complete self-reported weight history (highest adult weight, weight 1 year ago, number of ≥ 5% weight-loss episodes) and measured BMI were included. Metabolic scarring was defined by elevated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ≥ 5.7%) or HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5. We applied inverse-probability-weighted logistic regression to estimate the association between prior obesity and current HbA1c, adjusting for confounders. We then refit a survey-weighted logistic model using age per decade, current BMI, weight-history category, sex and race/ethnicity, converting regression coefficients into an integer point-based score. Discrimination was evaluated by survey-weighted area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Formerly obese individuals exhibited significantly higher HbA1c than never-obese peers (adjusted <i>β</i> = 0.58%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.002), indicative of metabolic scarring. The derived risk score ranged from −31 to +90 points (median = 6; IQR = −3 to 16) and achieved an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.77–0.81). Age per decade, BMI, and weight history contributed 4, 1 and up to 4 points, respectively; female sex and Non-Hispanic White race subtracted points. Calibration across predicted-risk deciles was excellent (slope = 0.98).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>A history of obesity imparts a lasting glycemic risk that is not captured by current BMI alone. Our metabolic scarring risk score offers a pragmatic tool for identifying individuals at elevated metabolic risk despite weight normalisation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edm2.70086\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edm2.70086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的心脏代谢风险评估主要依赖于患者当前的体重指数,然而,在肥胖一段时间后体重减轻的个体可能继续存在较高的代谢风险。我们试图量化过去肥胖对血糖控制的持续影响,并开发一种结合体重史和当前危险因素的临床风险评分。方法:我们对2011-2020年NHANES周期的15422名成年人(≥18岁)进行了横断面分析。参与者有完整的自我报告体重史(最高成人体重,1年前体重,≥5%体重减轻次数)和测量的BMI。代谢性瘢痕形成的定义是血红蛋白A1c升高(HbA1c≥5.7%)或HOMA-IR≥2.5。我们应用反概率加权逻辑回归来估计既往肥胖与当前HbA1c之间的关系,并对混杂因素进行调整。然后,我们使用每十年的年龄、当前BMI、体重史类别、性别和种族/民族重新构建了一个调查加权逻辑模型,将回归系数转换为基于点数的整数分数。通过调查加权面积下的接受者工作特征曲线(AUC)来评价歧视。结果既往肥胖者的HbA1c明显高于非肥胖者(调整后β = 0.58%, p < 0.002),表明代谢瘢痕形成。衍生风险评分范围从- 31到+90分(中位数= 6;IQR = - 3 ~ 16), AUC为0.79 (95% CI 0.77 ~ 0.81)。每十年的年龄、BMI和体重史分别贡献了4分、1分和最多4分;女性和非西班牙裔白人会扣分。预测风险十分位数的校准非常好(斜率= 0.98)。结论:肥胖史赋予持续的血糖风险,而当前的BMI不能单独捕捉到。我们的代谢疤痕风险评分提供了一种实用的工具,用于识别体重正常化后代谢风险升高的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Metabolic Scarring: The Persistent Impact of Past Obesity on Long-Term Metabolic Health Despite Weight Loss

Metabolic Scarring: The Persistent Impact of Past Obesity on Long-Term Metabolic Health Despite Weight Loss

Background

Conventional cardiometabolic risk assessment relies primarily on a patient's current body mass index, yet individuals who have lost weight after a period of obesity may continue to harbour elevated metabolic risk. We sought to quantify the persistent impact of past obesity on glycaemic control and to develop a clinical risk score that integrates weight history with current risk factors.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 15,422 adults (≥ 18 years) from the 2011–2020 NHANES cycles. Participants with complete self-reported weight history (highest adult weight, weight 1 year ago, number of ≥ 5% weight-loss episodes) and measured BMI were included. Metabolic scarring was defined by elevated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ≥ 5.7%) or HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5. We applied inverse-probability-weighted logistic regression to estimate the association between prior obesity and current HbA1c, adjusting for confounders. We then refit a survey-weighted logistic model using age per decade, current BMI, weight-history category, sex and race/ethnicity, converting regression coefficients into an integer point-based score. Discrimination was evaluated by survey-weighted area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

Formerly obese individuals exhibited significantly higher HbA1c than never-obese peers (adjusted β = 0.58%, p < 0.002), indicative of metabolic scarring. The derived risk score ranged from −31 to +90 points (median = 6; IQR = −3 to 16) and achieved an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI 0.77–0.81). Age per decade, BMI, and weight history contributed 4, 1 and up to 4 points, respectively; female sex and Non-Hispanic White race subtracted points. Calibration across predicted-risk deciles was excellent (slope = 0.98).

Conclusions

A history of obesity imparts a lasting glycemic risk that is not captured by current BMI alone. Our metabolic scarring risk score offers a pragmatic tool for identifying individuals at elevated metabolic risk despite weight normalisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信