{"title":"野猪入侵对美国连续13年作物种植的影响","authors":"Abigail B. Feuka, Kim M. Pepin, Nathan P. Snow","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wild pigs (<em>Sus scrofa</em>) are an invasive pest that cause extensive damage to agricultural crops. We examined the extent that planting for five types of crops known to sustain damage from wild pigs (corn [<em>Zea mays</em>], cotton [<em>Gossypium</em> L.], peanuts [<em>Arachis hypogaea</em>], soybeans [<em>Glycine max</em>], and wheat [<em>Triticum</em> spp.]) was influenced by the expansion of wild pigs in counties of the United States (US) during 2009–2022. Specifically, we examined changes in planting anomalies (i.e., the amount planted relative to the long-term average) relative to two variables that could explain wild pig pressure: the proportion of a county with wild pigs and a trend in the intensity of management, while accounting for other variables that could influence decisions to plant. We found that greater overlap with wild pig range was associated with larger planting anomalies for cotton. However, removal of wild pigs did not influence planting anomalies for any crop. We also found that planting anomalies were influenced by return on investment, climate, and the amount of Conservation Reserve Program lands. For some crops, these other factors were more influential than pressures from wild pigs. Our results indicate that producers are planting more cotton in areas with greater presence of wild pigs, and current management efforts to reduce populations of wild pigs are not altering those decisions. Producers switching to lessor-damaged crops as wild pigs expand their range in the US could alter future crop yields, and more intensive efforts to mitigate wild pigs may be needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"197 ","pages":"Article 107338"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of wild pig invasion on 13 years of crop planting in the contiguous United States\",\"authors\":\"Abigail B. Feuka, Kim M. Pepin, Nathan P. Snow\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Wild pigs (<em>Sus scrofa</em>) are an invasive pest that cause extensive damage to agricultural crops. We examined the extent that planting for five types of crops known to sustain damage from wild pigs (corn [<em>Zea mays</em>], cotton [<em>Gossypium</em> L.], peanuts [<em>Arachis hypogaea</em>], soybeans [<em>Glycine max</em>], and wheat [<em>Triticum</em> spp.]) was influenced by the expansion of wild pigs in counties of the United States (US) during 2009–2022. Specifically, we examined changes in planting anomalies (i.e., the amount planted relative to the long-term average) relative to two variables that could explain wild pig pressure: the proportion of a county with wild pigs and a trend in the intensity of management, while accounting for other variables that could influence decisions to plant. We found that greater overlap with wild pig range was associated with larger planting anomalies for cotton. However, removal of wild pigs did not influence planting anomalies for any crop. We also found that planting anomalies were influenced by return on investment, climate, and the amount of Conservation Reserve Program lands. For some crops, these other factors were more influential than pressures from wild pigs. Our results indicate that producers are planting more cotton in areas with greater presence of wild pigs, and current management efforts to reduce populations of wild pigs are not altering those decisions. Producers switching to lessor-damaged crops as wild pigs expand their range in the US could alter future crop yields, and more intensive efforts to mitigate wild pigs may be needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crop Protection\",\"volume\":\"197 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crop Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002303\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425002303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of wild pig invasion on 13 years of crop planting in the contiguous United States
Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are an invasive pest that cause extensive damage to agricultural crops. We examined the extent that planting for five types of crops known to sustain damage from wild pigs (corn [Zea mays], cotton [Gossypium L.], peanuts [Arachis hypogaea], soybeans [Glycine max], and wheat [Triticum spp.]) was influenced by the expansion of wild pigs in counties of the United States (US) during 2009–2022. Specifically, we examined changes in planting anomalies (i.e., the amount planted relative to the long-term average) relative to two variables that could explain wild pig pressure: the proportion of a county with wild pigs and a trend in the intensity of management, while accounting for other variables that could influence decisions to plant. We found that greater overlap with wild pig range was associated with larger planting anomalies for cotton. However, removal of wild pigs did not influence planting anomalies for any crop. We also found that planting anomalies were influenced by return on investment, climate, and the amount of Conservation Reserve Program lands. For some crops, these other factors were more influential than pressures from wild pigs. Our results indicate that producers are planting more cotton in areas with greater presence of wild pigs, and current management efforts to reduce populations of wild pigs are not altering those decisions. Producers switching to lessor-damaged crops as wild pigs expand their range in the US could alter future crop yields, and more intensive efforts to mitigate wild pigs may be needed.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.