堕胎和儿童保护服务的参与

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Christine Piette Durrance , Yang Wang , Barbara Wolfe
{"title":"堕胎和儿童保护服务的参与","authors":"Christine Piette Durrance ,&nbsp;Yang Wang ,&nbsp;Barbara Wolfe","doi":"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing evidence has found that abortion restrictions result in fewer and delayed abortions. Such restrictions may indirectly affect child wellbeing both through changes in births and for existing children in the home through mechanisms including substantial financial strains, negative health consequences, and intra-household power dynamics. Following the <em>Dobbs</em> decision, state-level abortion decisions have led to significantly greater abortion restrictions. We investigate the effects of abortion access on child welfare involvement using data from the National Child Abuse &amp; Neglect Data System (NCANDS). We utilize pre- and post-<em>Dobbs</em> data from 2017-2023, and estimate both difference-in-differences and event study methods, using both distance changes and policy changes. We find that increased distance to nearest abortion care is associated with higher rates of CPS referrals. Our findings provide critical insights into the broader social and health implications of abortion restrictions in post-<em>Dobbs</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 103032"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion access and child protective services involvement\",\"authors\":\"Christine Piette Durrance ,&nbsp;Yang Wang ,&nbsp;Barbara Wolfe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhealeco.2025.103032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Existing evidence has found that abortion restrictions result in fewer and delayed abortions. Such restrictions may indirectly affect child wellbeing both through changes in births and for existing children in the home through mechanisms including substantial financial strains, negative health consequences, and intra-household power dynamics. Following the <em>Dobbs</em> decision, state-level abortion decisions have led to significantly greater abortion restrictions. We investigate the effects of abortion access on child welfare involvement using data from the National Child Abuse &amp; Neglect Data System (NCANDS). We utilize pre- and post-<em>Dobbs</em> data from 2017-2023, and estimate both difference-in-differences and event study methods, using both distance changes and policy changes. We find that increased distance to nearest abortion care is associated with higher rates of CPS referrals. Our findings provide critical insights into the broader social and health implications of abortion restrictions in post-<em>Dobbs</em>.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\"103 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103032\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625000670\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167629625000670","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有证据表明,堕胎限制导致堕胎减少和延迟。这种限制可能通过出生变化间接影响儿童福祉,也可能通过大量财政压力、负面健康后果和家庭内部权力动态等机制间接影响家中现有儿童。在多布斯案判决之后,州一级的堕胎决定导致了更大的堕胎限制。我们调查了堕胎对儿童福利参与的影响,使用的数据来自国家儿童虐待;疏忽数据系统(NCANDS)。我们利用2017-2023年的dobbs前后数据,并使用距离变化和政策变化来估计差异中的差异和事件研究方法。我们发现,距离最近的堕胎护理增加与CPS转诊率较高有关。我们的研究结果为多布斯后堕胎限制的更广泛的社会和健康影响提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abortion access and child protective services involvement
Existing evidence has found that abortion restrictions result in fewer and delayed abortions. Such restrictions may indirectly affect child wellbeing both through changes in births and for existing children in the home through mechanisms including substantial financial strains, negative health consequences, and intra-household power dynamics. Following the Dobbs decision, state-level abortion decisions have led to significantly greater abortion restrictions. We investigate the effects of abortion access on child welfare involvement using data from the National Child Abuse & Neglect Data System (NCANDS). We utilize pre- and post-Dobbs data from 2017-2023, and estimate both difference-in-differences and event study methods, using both distance changes and policy changes. We find that increased distance to nearest abortion care is associated with higher rates of CPS referrals. Our findings provide critical insights into the broader social and health implications of abortion restrictions in post-Dobbs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Economics
Journal of Health Economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: This journal seeks articles related to the economics of health and medical care. Its scope will include the following topics: Production and supply of health services; Demand and utilization of health services; Financing of health services; Determinants of health, including investments in health and risky health behaviors; Economic consequences of ill-health; Behavioral models of demanders, suppliers and other health care agencies; Evaluation of policy interventions that yield economic insights; Efficiency and distributional aspects of health policy; and such other topics as the Editors may deem appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信